Kang

Kang — CS2 Stats

HN76561198357989994[U:1:397724266]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,610Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,552Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,336 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,336 → 1,336
+3Tracked matches · now 1,610
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 2 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,852 +1,113 15 Apr5 Jul · 12 days played
17,62520,120peak 20,12015 Apr5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,336 +0 5 Sept17 Sept · 4 observations
1,3361,336peak 1,3365 Sept17 Sept
20,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,336Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2026-04-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,336
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches38−5
Win rate33%25%+8pp
K/D0.550.81−0.26
Headshot %79%56%+23pp

Measured 12 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.3%45.8%46.8%3.5% short
Shot accuracy13.5%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.051.060.05 short
Match win rate46.2%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKangFACEITLevel 7 · 1,336 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,336csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning39
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateLLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.4pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.1
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 677ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning3.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time678ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%+5.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 27 Apr
44%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 30 Apr
461msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 9 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 27 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 6nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29181162%0.01
dust2C2491538%0.00
cacheD1541127%-0.00
ancientA116555%-0.00
nukeD82625%-0.01
anubisS660100%0.00
infernoC52340%0.01
overpass2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

107,333Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
5,498Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
43.3%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
13,782MVPs
3,034Hours (in match)
3,638Bombs planted
1,874Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,864
AWP14,136
MP91,981
FAMAS1,681
SG 5531,597

Lifetime map wins

7,066dust2
4,999inferno
1,855vertigo
1,379nuke
805train
168cbble
50office
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

346Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
71.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7657%1.0313.7
Ancient4650%0.8713.1
Dust24560%0.9715.0
Inferno2536%0.9115.8
Anubis2467%0.9414.7
Nuke1464%1.2213.4
Overpass1040%0.7914.0
Vertigo520%1.0015.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
677msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
6.05HE damage / grenade
9.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.1672% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0235%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0330%9 Sept
cache6–13-0.0229%7 Sept
nuke10–130.0433%7 Sept
dust213–90.0339%2 Sept
cache10–130.0416%30 Aug
dust26–13-0.0319%30 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0529%25 Aug
dust211–130.0521%23 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0114%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0320%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0425%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0527%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0615%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0613%19 Aug
dust213–100.0316%17 Aug
mirage13–110.0117%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0337%17 Aug
anubis13–110.0430%16 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0213%11 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0911%9 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0328%8 Aug
mirage8–1-0.0519%8 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0221%8 Aug
dust22–13-0.0917%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0119%5 Aug
cache2–1-0.0733%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0424%29 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0218%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.0334%21 Jul
dust22–13-0.0529%9 Jul
dust210–130.0319%9 Jul
ancient8–130.0031%5 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0226%5 Jul
dust24–13-0.0543%5 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0018%26 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0120%25 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0412%21 Jun
mirage11–130.0128%10 Jun
mirage13–110.0122%6 Jun
dust211–130.0133%1 Jun
dust213–90.0221%28 May
cache6–13-0.0615%28 May
dust24–130.0129%23 May
dust213–80.1222%21 May
dust26–130.0116%21 May
anubis16–13-0.0111%20 May
overpass10–13-0.0510%19 May
dust211–13-0.0622%12 May
cache8–13-0.0127%10 May
cache2–9-0.0425%10 May
cache13–40.0123%10 May
dust211–13-0.0426%9 May
cache12–12-0.0117%8 May
cache13–90.0328%7 May
dust213–90.0425%5 May
cache5–130.0038%5 May
overpass15–15-0.0622%5 May
cache12–120.0321%4 May
mirage13–9-0.0428%1 May
mirage6–130.0744%30 Apr
cache13–60.0420%30 Apr
cache1–6-0.0319%29 Apr
cache6–130.0524%29 Apr
cache9–130.0323%28 Apr
ancient11–130.0224%28 Apr
mirage13–10.1528%27 Apr
mirage13–40.0716%27 Apr
mirage13–70.0727%26 Apr
dust213–80.0337%26 Apr
dust213–60.1025%26 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0013%25 Apr
dust212–120.0417%25 Apr
mirage13–30.0217%25 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0021%23 Apr
anubis13–90.0312%23 Apr
mirage13–70.0232%23 Apr
mirage13–90.0217%22 Apr
inferno13–70.0423%22 Apr
mirage9–13-0.029%20 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0121%18 Apr
mirage13–40.0116%18 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0522%17 Apr
inferno13–80.0613%15 Apr
dust210–13-0.0626%15 Apr
ancient10–130.0619%14 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0122%13 Apr
dust213–30.0925%13 Apr
ancient9–130.0617%12 Apr
mirage13–110.0215%12 Apr
nuke13–90.0015%12 Apr
mirage13–80.1012%10 Apr
mirage6–130.0420%10 Apr
mirage2–13-0.076%9 Apr
mirage0–90.000%8 Apr
nuke6–11-0.0714%6 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0211%6 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0214%5 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0327%5 Apr
nuke13–60.0313%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →