swg

swg — CS2 Stats

MN76561198354944894[U:1:394679166]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,909Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating22,815Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41511 of 232151 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,849 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,909 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 8 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,815 +3,298 18 Jul16 Sept · 25 days played
19,51724,115peak 24,11518 Jul16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,849 +0 30 Aug16 Sept · 5 observations
1,8491,849peak 1,84930 Aug16 Sept
24,186Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,849Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,849
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 152 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,300 below peak (24,115)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,185 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGswgFACEITLevel 9 · 1,849 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,815 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,849csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning59
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50446Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch4.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.9
Utility7.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time617ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 28 Jul
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 13 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 14 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 27 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 19anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB26121446%0.04
cacheS1913668%0.04
infernoA1810856%0.02
nukeB158753%0.04
mirageD102820%0.05
anubisD5050%0.01
dust242250%0.03
shelter110100%0.03
boulder110100%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

435Matches
56%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11464%1.1315.2
Inferno7949%0.9513.8
Anubis6555%0.9813.8
Mirage4356%0.9814.6
Nuke3858%1.1116.9
Dust23050%0.7912.2
Train7100%1.6217.9
Overpass2100%1.4921.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
616msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
11.69HE damage / grenade
8.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.1521%14 Aug
nuke7–130.0342%14 Aug
ancient10–130.0519%14 Aug
inferno3–12-0.0420%13 Aug
inferno3–130.0014%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0520%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0124%12 Aug
ancient5–130.0919%9 Aug
anubis7–130.0828%9 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0118%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0418%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0613%7 Aug
cache13–70.1833%7 Aug
inferno9–130.1126%6 Aug
cache13–70.0312%6 Aug
mirage5–130.0815%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0124%5 Aug
nuke13–90.0528%5 Aug
cache13–30.1231%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0612%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0820%3 Aug
cache13–160.0225%2 Aug
dust215–150.0924%2 Aug
mirage15–150.0929%2 Aug
ancient13–30.0626%1 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0117%1 Aug
nuke4–00.0630%1 Aug
ancient15–150.0420%1 Aug
nuke13–90.0224%1 Aug
ancient13–90.0619%1 Aug
ancient5–130.0114%31 Jul
nuke13–30.1227%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0730%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0520%31 Jul
mirage13–50.0815%31 Jul
inferno10–130.0219%31 Jul
ancient15–150.0516%31 Jul
nuke3–130.0619%31 Jul
nuke13–30.1125%31 Jul
cache13–90.0420%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0713%31 Jul
ancient9–130.0125%31 Jul
mirage7–130.1037%31 Jul
nuke6–130.0917%31 Jul
inferno9–130.0112%31 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0017%29 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0418%29 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0213%29 Jul
ancient13–110.1219%28 Jul
ancient10–130.0521%28 Jul
nuke15–150.0926%28 Jul
nuke5–130.0424%28 Jul
ancient13–60.1022%28 Jul
cache13–20.1933%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0317%27 Jul
ancient11–130.0432%27 Jul
nuke13–60.1237%27 Jul
mirage5–130.0234%27 Jul
cache13–00.0722%27 Jul
ancient11–130.0829%27 Jul
cache13–110.0620%27 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0014%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0613%26 Jul
cache13–10.0324%26 Jul
inferno6–10.0719%26 Jul
dust213–80.0418%26 Jul
anubis3–130.0217%26 Jul
cache13–40.0334%25 Jul
inferno13–90.0931%25 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0814%21 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0026%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.016%18 Jul
cache9–130.0223%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0913%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0317%18 Jul
ancient5–130.0720%18 Jul
dust213–60.0216%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0330%18 Jul
inferno13–80.0326%17 Jul
cache13–80.1221%16 Jul
cache13–60.0517%15 Jul
cache16–120.0224%15 Jul
cache13–7-0.0358%13 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0122%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0625%13 Jul
cache14–16-0.0218%13 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0414%12 Jul
ancient13–40.067%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0420%12 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0422%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0224%12 Jul
shelter13–100.0314%11 Jul
boulder13–4-0.0410%11 Jul
mirage15–150.0036%10 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0216%10 Jul
cache2–13-0.0911%9 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0219%9 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0218%9 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0120%8 Jul
inferno13–110.0512%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →