stifi

stifi — CS2 Stats

76561198354012608[U:1:393746880]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,410Tracked matches70%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,478Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,224Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10394 of 221769 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,101 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1319Premier CS Rating · 24,905 → 26,224
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 21 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,224 +3,720 21 Jun17 Sept · 35 days played
18,93626,224peak 26,22421 Jun17 Sept
26,224Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,101Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,101
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 399 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,224
  • +6,466 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,720 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,776 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.0%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy10.8%13.0%13.2%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.781.061.070.29 short
Match win rate51.3%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstifiFACEITLevel 8 · 2,101 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,224 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,101csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57412Last 10057%Win rateWWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −6.1pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time587ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 23 Jun
69%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · inferno, 23 Jun
336msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · nuke, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA40241660%-0.01
dust2A149564%-0.01
ancientS118373%-0.02
cacheA95456%0.00
infernoD92722%-0.03
anubisA74357%-0.04
nukeD62433%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.11
vertigo110100%-0.05
debris110100%0.04
eldorado110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,140Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
3,555Matches
51.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
55.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
10.8%Shot accuracy
10,699MVPs
1,998Hours (in match)
2,610Bombs planted
1,987Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,134
AWP7,031
MP91,385
MAC-101,384
Knife1,227

Lifetime map wins

6,025inferno
4,473dust2
4,277vertigo
4,167nuke
2,098train
52cbble
17office
16lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,780Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
68.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18655%0.9313.3
Ancient9153%0.9413.6
Anubis6751%0.9214.1
Dust24945%0.8912.7
Nuke2737%0.8714.1
Inferno1631%0.7912.8
Train1573%1.0015.3
Overpass1030%0.8011.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
72.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
598msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
6.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–3-0.0527%17 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0710%17 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0022%17 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0127%17 Sept
ancient13–3-0.039%17 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0717%16 Sept
dust21–13-0.0214%16 Sept
dust216–130.0427%16 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0417%16 Sept
anubis8–130.0322%16 Sept
ancient13–40.0453%16 Sept
mirage13–40.0322%15 Sept
dust213–1-0.0415%15 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0321%15 Sept
dust213–10-0.0642%15 Sept
mirage11–130.0115%14 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0321%13 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0225%13 Sept
cache11–13-0.0622%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0217%10 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0414%10 Sept
mirage12–160.0230%10 Sept
dust213–7-0.0930%9 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0522%8 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0513%7 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0320%6 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0017%6 Sept
mirage13–90.0211%4 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0414%4 Sept
inferno11–130.0932%3 Sept
nuke1–5-0.0022%3 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0217%2 Sept
mirage7–130.0118%1 Sept
dust213–40.0220%30 Aug
anubis2–5-0.0727%27 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0129%26 Aug
cache13–80.0338%25 Aug
nuke8–130.0323%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0521%20 Aug
ancient13–60.0216%20 Aug
mirage11–130.0528%20 Aug
cache13–20.0425%20 Aug
mirage13–50.0163%19 Aug
cache13–40.0310%19 Aug
dust213–80.0425%19 Aug
dust216–14-0.0020%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0219%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0267%17 Aug
mirage13–40.0822%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1011%14 Aug
ancient7–130.0230%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0029%5 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0215%4 Aug
dust211–130.0221%4 Aug
dust213–100.0318%4 Aug
overpass7–9-0.1115%4 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0525%4 Aug
inferno2–9-0.075%4 Aug
dust26–130.0113%3 Aug
cache8–13-0.1011%3 Aug
cache15–15-0.0112%2 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0221%30 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0234%30 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0525%28 Jul
inferno3–7-0.0860%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0544%27 Jul
cache13–60.0038%26 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0924%26 Jul
debris9–20.0415%25 Jul
eldorado9–60.0431%25 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0312%25 Jul
nuke13–1-0.0321%23 Jul
cache3–130.1023%22 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0419%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0221%20 Jul
mirage0–3-0.010%17 Jul
mirage13–50.0440%17 Jul
dust20–13-0.060%17 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0116%15 Jul
mirage11–0-0.0031%15 Jul
inferno4–130.0635%14 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0619%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0430%11 Jul
cache13–90.0131%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0341%7 Jul
mirage13–100.0412%6 Jul
mirage9–130.0029%5 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1027%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0131%3 Jul
dust213–30.0122%3 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0420%2 Jul
dust26–13-0.0145%28 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0032%28 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0411%25 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0240%23 Jun
inferno9–30.1369%23 Jun
inferno9–2-0.1720%23 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0427%22 Jun
mirage5–130.0216%22 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0824%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →