☣keijjo☣

☣keijjo☣ — CS2 Stats

BY76561198353272284[U:1:393006556]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,648Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,858Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,749Purple band · top ~21.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,951 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,648 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 24 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,749 -2,772 24 Apr3 Sept · 22 days played
16,74920,123peak 20,12324 Apr3 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,951 +0 2 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,9511,951peak 1,9512 Sept3 Sept
20,123Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,951Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-04-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,951
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,374 below peak (20,123)
  • -978 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,251 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.3%48.3%51.0%7.7% short
Shot accuracy14.6%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.151.071.09above
Match win rate46.7%46.9%48.4%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☣keijjo☣FACEITLevel 9 · 1,951 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER16,749 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,951csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning55
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +65ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 728ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 716ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility7.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.5
Utility7.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time647ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–3 · nuke, 24 Jun
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · dust2, 16 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · inferno, 3 Jul
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 1 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23121152%0.01
infernoA2011955%0.02
nukeC146843%0.00
dust2B136746%0.01
overpassS96367%0.00
anubisD93633%0.00
ancientD92722%-0.02
vertigo21150%0.01
cache110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

214,687Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10,664Matches
46.7%Match win rate
43.3%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
31,824MVPs
3,858Hours (in match)
6,422Bombs planted
3,074Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,223
AWP33,781
SSG 084,493
MP94,324
AUG3,911
FAMAS3,905

Lifetime map wins

12,893inferno
9,802nuke
7,645dust2
5,426lake
5,313train
2,723vertigo
757office
633cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

711Matches
50%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
92.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23651%1.1918.4
Inferno14147%1.2318.8
Nuke10655%1.2720.4
Ancient7749%1.2218.6
Anubis2829%1.0517.5
Train2650%1.2418.4
Dust22454%1.1118.5
Overpass1118%1.0819.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
663msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
13.96HE damage / grenade
11.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.2043% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass6–90.0534%27 Jul
nuke6–9-0.0528%27 Jul
vertigo9–70.1246%27 Jul
anubis16–130.0617%27 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1022%27 Jul
nuke6–13-0.066%20 Jul
dust28–13-0.0328%20 Jul
dust213–50.1217%20 Jul
dust22–13-0.0621%20 Jul
mirage13–90.0424%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0024%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0121%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0018%20 Jul
cache13–70.0229%20 Jul
dust213–100.0017%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0919%19 Jul
ancient14–160.0035%16 Jul
dust20–6-0.0167%16 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0219%16 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0419%12 Jul
mirage13–100.1023%10 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0443%10 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0316%3 Jul
mirage13–40.0624%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0429%3 Jul
dust215–150.0228%3 Jul
inferno9–50.1253%3 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0631%30 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0317%29 Jun
inferno13–70.0723%29 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0133%29 Jun
inferno9–50.0426%28 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0027%28 Jun
anubis13–80.0339%28 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0324%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0222%26 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0521%26 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0235%26 Jun
dust213–70.0517%26 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0225%26 Jun
dust29–13-0.0121%26 Jun
ancient13–110.0838%26 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0224%25 Jun
mirage13–90.0523%25 Jun
inferno9–60.1346%24 Jun
nuke9–7-0.0519%24 Jun
nuke9–30.0139%24 Jun
overpass4–9-0.170%24 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0146%24 Jun
nuke9–30.1638%24 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0531%24 Jun
overpass9–70.0438%24 Jun
vertigo7–9-0.1024%24 Jun
inferno9–70.1419%24 Jun
nuke8–80.1525%24 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0336%24 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0123%23 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0727%23 Jun
anubis10–130.0622%23 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0323%23 Jun
overpass9–7-0.0714%21 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0330%21 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0223%21 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0631%11 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0524%11 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0537%11 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0235%11 Jun
overpass9–10.1314%10 Jun
inferno16–130.0418%10 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0228%8 Jun
nuke14–160.0016%6 Jun
dust213–90.0330%6 Jun
anubis13–30.0541%6 Jun
dust213–7-0.0340%5 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0430%5 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0128%3 Jun
dust25–13-0.0622%3 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0224%3 Jun
overpass13–100.0535%3 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0626%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0514%1 Jun
mirage11–130.0717%31 May
ancient4–13-0.0424%29 May
mirage10–13-0.0420%28 May
ancient11–13-0.0617%24 May
inferno7–130.0123%23 May
anubis7–13-0.0333%21 May
ancient8–130.0123%15 May
mirage7–13-0.0432%14 May
mirage13–110.0021%7 May
dust213–110.0220%7 May
anubis8–13-0.0921%4 May
nuke13–100.1026%4 May
mirage13–40.1425%2 May
inferno13–20.1532%1 May
inferno4–13-0.0415%29 Apr
overpass13–50.0826%29 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0014%27 Apr
mirage13–20.0727%27 Apr
dust211–130.1026%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →