Thuc

Thuc — CS2 Stats

DE76561198350980295[U:1:390714567]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,164Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,054Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,500Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26018 of 239585 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,164 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 31 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,500 +6,185 31 Dec13 Sept · 20 days played
16,09024,615peak 24,61531 Dec13 Sept
24,615Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2025-12-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 115 below peak (24,615)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 500 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 14 Sep 2026 and 23 Sep 2026.

Measured 14 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3
Win rate33%
K/D0.88
Headshot %63%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,275), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.0%44.8%45.7%3.7% short
Shot accuracy17.1%12.5%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.031.050.09 short
Match win rate40.3%45.2%45.7%5.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThucFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER24,500 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time533ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 19 Aug
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 11 Aug
383msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 25 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 20 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32151747%-0.01
infernoA27171063%-0.01
ancientC114736%-0.01
dust2B84450%0.01
cacheS65183%0.02
nukeS64267%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.05
overpass43175%-0.03
train1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,918Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
4,405Matches
40.3%Match win rate
42.0%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
11,986MVPs
2,054Hours (in match)
3,631Bombs planted
1,050Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,640
AWP17,511
P2508,141
FAMAS3,689
MP71,867

Lifetime map wins

8,261inferno
4,892dust2
1,442vertigo
1,401cbble
1,218nuke
1,136train
162office
100italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

679Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
108.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1573%0.9213.3
Mirage1258%0.7811.8
Vertigo1050%0.8612.0
Ancient862%1.1418.5
Cache367%1.7021.0
Dust2250%1.8825.0
Overpass10%0.183.0
Anubis1100%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
506msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.3%Flash assists
10.63HE damage / grenade
4.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7032% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0431%8 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0122%5 Sept
cache13–60.0623%5 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0322%28 Aug
cache13–40.0630%27 Aug
anubis8–3-0.127%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0737%27 Aug
cache13–5-0.0815%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0117%27 Aug
dust213–60.0514%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0314%26 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0317%26 Aug
anubis13–110.0218%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0221%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0119%25 Aug
cache9–130.0112%25 Aug
mirage13–50.0015%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0616%19 Aug
ancient13–70.1919%19 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0231%13 Aug
cache16–13-0.0141%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0332%13 Aug
dust213–100.0353%11 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0525%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0114%7 Aug
inferno13–100.0011%6 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0311%6 Aug
inferno4–4-0.056%5 Aug
cache13–70.0922%5 Aug
nuke13–90.0318%5 Aug
mirage1–4-0.0340%14 Apr
nuke13–60.0714%12 Apr
inferno13–80.0530%11 Apr
inferno13–60.0519%11 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0213%11 Apr
inferno9–0-0.0025%22 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0920%21 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0617%20 Mar
inferno13–20.0144%20 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0621%20 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0028%20 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0423%20 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0017%20 Mar
inferno13–8-0.048%25 Feb
mirage16–120.0619%24 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0021%24 Feb
mirage11–130.0224%24 Feb
inferno13–100.0113%22 Feb
ancient10–130.0117%22 Feb
nuke16–13-0.0315%20 Feb
mirage13–100.0112%20 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0323%20 Feb
dust215–15-0.0421%20 Feb
dust213–9-0.0115%19 Feb
ancient13–50.019%19 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0114%19 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0516%17 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0318%14 Feb
inferno13–50.0516%13 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0317%13 Feb
overpass13–60.0110%13 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0017%13 Feb
mirage6–4-0.0111%12 Feb
mirage1–70.0314%12 Feb
dust210–130.0123%12 Feb
mirage13–90.0021%11 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0516%11 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0525%11 Feb
mirage10–130.0111%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0427%8 Feb
inferno13–80.0433%8 Feb
dust213–20.0623%8 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0319%7 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0216%7 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0120%7 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0023%6 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0843%3 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0914%3 Jan
inferno12–12-0.0812%3 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0617%3 Jan
inferno13–40.0611%3 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0214%3 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0220%3 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0513%2 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0417%2 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0122%2 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0017%2 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0815%1 Jan
mirage13–110.0311%1 Jan
overpass3–13-0.0527%1 Jan
mirage7–130.0417%1 Jan
inferno12–12-0.0127%1 Jan
dust27–130.0113%1 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0122%1 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0413%31 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0114%31 Dec
overpass13–4-0.0513%31 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0515%31 Dec
mirage0–13-0.0915%31 Dec
train2–13-0.0920%31 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →