Ratz — CS2 Stats

GF76561198346093148[U:1:385827420]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,313Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,533Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport

Premier CS Rating26,147Top 10% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12371 of 258971 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,250 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,147 +3,392 17 Aug – 28 Oct · 18 days played

26,147Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,250Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

48Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,250
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 250 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-10-19
Level 9 first seen 2026-10-19

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 26,147
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,853 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-10-19
Purple band first seen 2026-10-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	41.5%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	11.5%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	0.99	1.09
Match win rate	47.7%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning67

Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–40–1Last 10059%Win rateLLWWWTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

5–4–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 12%
Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

9–10–1 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3

Utility8.0

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.7

Utility8.0

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels4.8

Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time521ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms

Headshot accuracy13.7%−3.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 2 Sept →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 1 Sept →

383msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · vertigo, 3 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

13–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7cacheWeakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
vertigo	A	20	12–8	60%	0.03
cache	C	16	6–10	38%	0.03
anubis	A	16	10–6	63%	0.03
mirage	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
nuke	S	10	7–3	70%	0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
ancient	S	7	6–1	86%	0.01
office	—	3	3–0	100%	0.09
train	—	3	2–1	67%	0.06
dust2	—	2	0–2	0%	0.05
poseidon	—	2	2–0	100%	0.12
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

164,142Lifetime kills

0.99K/D

9,156Matches

47.7%Match win rate

41.5%Headshot %

11.5%Shot accuracy

33,466MVPs

3,893Hours (in match)

5,091Bombs planted

9,740Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,317

M4A4 / M4A1-S27,438

AWP20,452

Desert Eagle16,452

P2000 / USP-S9,655

Glock-187,386

MP93,657

Galil AR3,109

MAC-102,932

SSG 082,773

Lifetime map wins

13,443dust2

12,756inferno

11,842vertigo

9,247nuke

6,572train

3,998cbble

1,028office

109italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,106Matches

54%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

86.2ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	205	50%	1.04	16.3
Nuke	97	60%	1.12	17.2
Inferno	72	58%	1.19	18.1
Dust2	46	43%	1.02	15.3
Anubis	38	55%	1.10	15.9
Ancient	36	47%	1.03	16.0
Overpass	36	47%	1.08	17.0
Vertigo	19	47%	1.02	16.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.6%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

8.2°Preaim

518msReaction time

43.7%T opening success

54.3%CT opening success

0.68Enemies flashed / flash

9.9%Flash assists

12.88HE damage / grenade

21.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.5637% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	10–13	0.03	19%	30 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.02	13%	29 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.04	6%	28 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.04	17%	28 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.04	9%	28 Oct →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	10%	28 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.07	21%	27 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.01	0%	27 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.02	16%	27 Oct →
anubis	13–8	0.05	10%	27 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.01	11%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–5	0.01	22%	26 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	0.03	10%	25 Oct →
office	13–4	0.12	30%	25 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.08	11%	23 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.04	13%	23 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	6%	23 Oct →
cache	10–13	0.02	14%	22 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.04	17%	21 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.01	6%	21 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.03	17%	21 Oct →
ancient	16–14	0.03	14%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	21%	20 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.00	10%	20 Oct →
cache	7–13	0.03	12%	20 Oct →
cache	8–13	0.06	17%	19 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.00	15%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.01	12%	19 Oct →
anubis	13–4	0.10	5%	19 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.09	30%	18 Oct →
cache	13–0	0.05	20%	18 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.16	4%	18 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	-0.04	13%	18 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.01	16%	17 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	12%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	8%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	15%	14 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.10	32%	13 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.07	12%	12 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	23%	11 Oct →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	15%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.03	25%	9 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	0.03	10%	8 Oct →
train	13–11	0.15	15%	7 Oct →
train	13–7	0.11	16%	7 Oct →
train	1–13	-0.08	14%	7 Oct →
mirage	0–5	-0.09	10%	1 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	17%	1 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	16%	30 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.01	2%	29 Sept →
anubis	13–2	0.01	12%	26 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	13%	25 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	-0.06	14%	23 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.10	18%	23 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	0.11	8%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.11	15%	21 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	19%	18 Sept →
nuke	6–9	-0.05	16%	17 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.01	13%	17 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.10	23%	17 Sept →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	20%	16 Sept →
vertigo	3–9	-0.01	14%	15 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.05	16%	15 Sept →
nuke	16–14	0.07	21%	14 Sept →
inferno	16–19	0.02	17%	10 Sept →
poseidon	9–6	0.03	16%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.03	12%	9 Sept →
vertigo	13–3	0.04	11%	9 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	7 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	11%	7 Sept →
office	13–10	0.05	16%	5 Sept →
vertigo	1–5	0.05	17%	3 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	-0.02	13%	3 Sept →
vertigo	9–2	0.23	17%	2 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.18	33%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.05	18%	1 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.09	20%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.06	30%	1 Sept →
anubis	3–7	-0.07	19%	1 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.06	15%	1 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.03	21%	30 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	23%	30 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.06	12%	30 Aug →
poseidon	9–3	0.20	14%	30 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	15%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.08	15%	29 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.10	22%	28 Aug →
vertigo	1–9	-0.16	25%	28 Aug →
italy	7–13	0.01	14%	26 Aug →
office	13–7	0.10	13%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	18%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	10%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	32%	21 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.01	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	10%	19 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	9%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.03	14%	18 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.01	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	13%	13 Aug →