JC

JC — CS2 Stats

EH76561198344861409[U:1:384595681]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

622Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,407Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 622
+8.7ppWin rate · 46.4% → 55.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 10 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,597 +948 10 Apr27 Jun · 28 days played
20,58323,455peak 23,45510 Apr27 Jun
23,455Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-04-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.1%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy16.5%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.021.040.03 short
Match win rate23.7%44.7%45.3%21.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJCFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning44
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.7pp headshot accuracy · −116ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 447ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 454ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time518ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 11 Apr
40%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · overpass, 22 May
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · cache, 15 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 16 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2381535%-0.00
anubisA22121055%0.03
nukeS1510567%0.02
infernoC135838%0.01
cacheB84450%0.02
ancientD62433%0.01
overpassB63350%0.01
dust2C52340%0.01
train110100%-0.00
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

160,033Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,522Matches
23.7%Match win rate
45.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
7,472MVPs
2,128Hours (in match)
1,728Bombs planted
604Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4760,489
Glock-1813,568
AWP13,056
SSG 084,165
FAMAS1,494
SG 5531,408
Negev1,320

Lifetime map wins

2,510inferno
2,299dust2
999nuke
222train
214vertigo
171ar_shoots
171lake
139safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
55%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
84.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.5022.0
Cache333%1.0416.7
Overpass333%1.2318.3
Inferno367%1.088.0
Nuke367%1.3817.7
Ancient1100%1.3117.0
Dust21100%0.9417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
525msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
31.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
7.88HE damage / grenade
14.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4273% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0532%5 Sept
anubis13–40.0321%5 Sept
anubis13–30.0921%5 Sept
nuke13–80.0732%5 Sept
dust28–13-0.0229%5 Sept
nuke16–130.0125%2 Sept
ancient13–110.0011%2 Sept
inferno13–30.0420%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.0417%15 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0531%10 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0314%10 Jul
nuke13–50.0218%9 Jul
mirage4–130.0127%7 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0918%5 Jul
nuke13–90.0425%5 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0019%5 Jul
overpass13–90.0316%4 Jul
anubis13–11-0.027%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0615%27 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0316%7 Jun
nuke16–190.0124%7 Jun
train16–13-0.0011%5 Jun
cache13–10-0.0224%5 Jun
vertigo10–13-0.0217%5 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0416%5 Jun
anubis11–130.0519%5 Jun
anubis11–130.0134%28 May
ancient7–13-0.0119%28 May
ancient13–70.0721%27 May
mirage15–150.0111%27 May
anubis15–150.0219%25 May
anubis13–100.0912%24 May
mirage9–130.0424%23 May
dust26–130.0134%23 May
anubis2–13-0.0333%22 May
overpass6–130.0640%22 May
inferno16–130.0025%21 May
mirage8–13-0.0621%21 May
mirage13–80.0624%21 May
ancient10–130.0126%21 May
nuke16–130.0414%19 May
mirage8–13-0.0320%19 May
dust213–50.0218%19 May
nuke13–4-0.0123%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0110%17 May
nuke13–100.039%17 May
ancient11–130.0327%17 May
anubis7–130.0432%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0420%16 May
dust28–10.0112%16 May
anubis13–10.0920%16 May
inferno15–150.0212%16 May
anubis13–40.0718%16 May
mirage13–60.1129%14 May
nuke10–130.1114%1 May
inferno11–130.0212%1 May
anubis13–90.0011%1 May
anubis15–15-0.0514%30 Apr
inferno13–20.0821%30 Apr
cache12–120.0515%30 Apr
cache1–13-0.0621%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0314%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0115%29 Apr
cache13–90.1727%29 Apr
cache13–30.0917%29 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0120%28 Apr
mirage3–130.0423%28 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0515%27 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0219%27 Apr
overpass14–16-0.059%26 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0322%26 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0120%25 Apr
inferno8–130.0530%25 Apr
mirage3–130.0322%25 Apr
mirage1–13-0.096%25 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0630%25 Apr
inferno4–130.0433%25 Apr
inferno15–150.0217%24 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0013%24 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0015%16 Apr
anubis13–80.0230%16 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0416%16 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0219%15 Apr
anubis13–70.0312%15 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0128%15 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0523%14 Apr
nuke13–110.0135%14 Apr
mirage13–100.0530%14 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0414%13 Apr
nuke13–10.0920%13 Apr
inferno16–140.0620%13 Apr
anubis13–90.1237%12 Apr
nuke7–13-0.077%12 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0120%11 Apr
nuke13–50.0218%11 Apr
anubis10–130.0118%11 Apr
anubis13–80.2125%11 Apr
dust211–130.0420%11 Apr
mirage14–160.0211%10 Apr
mirage16–130.0529%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →