TTV/RaceK8

TTV/RaceK8 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198343149726[U:1:382883998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

548Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,382Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,077 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 548 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 8 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,940 +4,428 11 Jan27 Feb · 9 days played
18,51223,570peak 23,57011 Jan27 Feb
Faceit ELO: 1,077 +0 2 Sept13 Sept · 2 observations
1,0771,077peak 1,0772 Sept13 Sept
23,767Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,077Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-01-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,077
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 20 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.5%44.8%45.7%3.2% short
Shot accuracy19.2%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.041.050.03 short
Match win rate37.8%45.2%45.7%7.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTTV/RaceK8FACEITLevel 6 · 1,077 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,077csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49456Last 10049%Win rateWWLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time600ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy27.3%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–1 · overpass, 27 Jan
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 17 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 28 Apr
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 19 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB34181653%-0.01
mirageC2181338%0.01
nukeC1871139%-0.01
dust2A85363%0.03
overpassA74357%-0.02
vertigoA53260%-0.04
ancient43175%-0.03
office21150%0.01
anubis1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,628Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
4,130Matches
37.8%Match win rate
42.5%Headshot %
19.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
9,868MVPs
4,382Hours (in match)
2,121Bombs planted
732Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,078
AWP18,037
SSG 081,871
FAMAS1,593
MAC-101,252

Lifetime map wins

5,024dust2
3,795inferno
1,935vertigo
798nuke
685train
241cbble
100safehouse
89lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

372Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
85.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%1.2018.1
Dust2862%1.1015.6
Nuke367%1.4517.0
Inferno367%2.1819.7
Train367%1.3818.0
Overpass2100%0.9217.5
Ancient250%1.1016.5
Anubis10%1.1219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
612msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
58.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
3.47HE damage / grenade
9.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9997% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–7-0.0217%2 Sept
inferno9–40.0132%2 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1123%1 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0033%19 Aug
nuke5–9-0.1927%19 Aug
vertigo6–9-0.1722%18 Aug
inferno4–9-0.2160%17 Jul
inferno9–20.1129%17 Jul
nuke7–9-0.0326%17 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1660%7 Jul
inferno9–60.0633%7 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0846%4 Jul
nuke4–9-0.209%4 Jul
vertigo9–7-0.0638%2 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0944%2 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1750%28 Apr
overpass7–9-0.1710%28 Apr
dust213–90.0425%25 Apr
inferno7–130.0320%5 Apr
mirage12–120.0937%5 Apr
mirage11–130.0414%29 Mar
inferno11–130.0024%21 Mar
mirage13–80.0429%21 Mar
inferno9–30.1017%2 Mar
mirage16–130.0015%27 Feb
nuke6–130.0117%25 Feb
dust25–13-0.0518%25 Feb
nuke11–13-0.059%25 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0523%24 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0528%24 Feb
nuke2–9-0.1620%24 Feb
inferno6–9-0.0520%24 Feb
nuke13–60.0225%21 Feb
overpass6–9-0.0732%21 Feb
mirage13–60.0229%21 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0632%20 Feb
inferno6–130.0742%20 Feb
inferno13–80.0344%20 Feb
mirage13–70.1422%20 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0225%20 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0122%19 Feb
mirage13–100.0629%19 Feb
inferno13–30.1020%19 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0519%19 Feb
mirage10–130.0121%19 Feb
dust216–140.0621%19 Feb
dust213–30.1236%19 Feb
inferno13–50.109%19 Feb
inferno8–80.0122%18 Feb
vertigo9–6-0.0238%18 Feb
mirage8–130.0239%18 Feb
nuke13–30.0523%18 Feb
mirage13–80.0513%17 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0027%17 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0513%17 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0520%17 Feb
nuke8–80.0219%17 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0213%15 Feb
mirage11–130.0437%15 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0410%15 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0617%13 Feb
nuke13–60.0124%13 Feb
dust213–10-0.0113%13 Feb
inferno4–9-0.138%13 Feb
inferno9–40.1138%13 Feb
nuke8–80.1314%13 Feb
nuke9–40.1144%13 Feb
inferno0–9-0.1711%13 Feb
vertigo4–9-0.0927%13 Feb
nuke9–70.0224%12 Feb
nuke6–9-0.0222%12 Feb
nuke3–130.0134%7 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0119%7 Feb
nuke13–110.0235%6 Feb
inferno5–9-0.1626%6 Feb
overpass9–7-0.0111%6 Feb
nuke9–40.0129%6 Feb
inferno9–6-0.0214%6 Feb
inferno13–100.0737%5 Feb
inferno12–30.0438%1 Feb
dust29–130.0534%29 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0430%29 Jan
overpass3–6-0.0111%29 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0031%29 Jan
mirage13–3-0.0429%28 Jan
overpass9–10.1422%27 Jan
inferno5–9-0.0228%27 Jan
dust27–13-0.0436%27 Jan
inferno13–40.0126%25 Jan
office13–60.0324%23 Jan
office10–13-0.0238%23 Jan
inferno13–60.0413%15 Jan
inferno13–30.0724%15 Jan
ancient13–80.0134%12 Jan
dust213–90.0532%11 Jan
mirage8–130.0423%11 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0416%11 Jan
inferno9–10.1129%9 Jan
vertigo9–20.1331%8 Jan
inferno8–80.0623%8 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →