𝕽𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖔𝖗 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198340263183[U:1:379997455]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,990Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,666Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating10,296Blue band · top ~53.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#41577 of 58427 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,669), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	42.5%	42.7%	43.7%	1.2% short
Shot accuracy	12.9%	10.8%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.89	1.00	1.02	0.13 short
Match win rate	43.4%	44.1%	45.0%	1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning41

Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLLLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression4.5

Utility3.2

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning4.1

Utility3.2

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time659ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%−3.3%

first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.35Best rating — vertigo 9–2

13–3Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

L6Current streak

9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 22dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	43	18–25	42%	-0.01
nuke	A	22	13–9	59%	-0.00
dust2	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.01
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.01
mirage	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.04
office	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
vertigo	—	4	3–1	75%	0.17
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,825Lifetime kills

0.89K/D

5,421Matches

43.4%Match win rate

42.5%Headshot %

12.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players

11,417MVPs

2,013Hours (in match)

4,145Bombs planted

849Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,743

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,920

AWP11,332

Desert Eagle6,868

P2000 / USP-S4,874

Glock-183,951

P901,758

MP71,749

P2501,743

Galil AR1,728

Lifetime map wins

9,302nuke

8,466dust2

6,328inferno

3,007office

2,590vertigo

776train

635cbble

261lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches

53%Win rate

0.85Avg K/D

89.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	10	70%	1.11	18.9
Inferno	3	100%	0.82	14.7
Nuke	2	50%	1.26	21.0
Dust2	2	100%	1.56	18.0
Vertigo	1	100%	1.31	17.0
Anubis	1	100%	0.57	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.6%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

639msReaction time

30.2%T opening success

37.2%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

12.23HE damage / grenade

2.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4971 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.2413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	2–13	-0.06	23%	25 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	20%	25 May →
office	4–13	-0.06	15%	25 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	24%	16 May →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	30%	16 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	13%	16 May →
ancient	13–3	0.03	18%	16 May →
cache	12–3	0.04	31%	16 May →
cache	11–13	-0.09	13%	14 May →
office	7–13	-0.00	24%	14 May →
cache	7–13	-0.06	18%	6 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	18%	5 Apr →
inferno	7–9	0.02	17%	29 Mar →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	12%	23 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	11%	23 Feb →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	18%	22 Feb →
dust2	6–13	0.06	27%	22 Feb →
dust2	14–16	0.01	28%	21 Feb →
ancient	14–16	0.00	24%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	11%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–7	0.03	19%	21 Feb →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	11%	13 Feb →
inferno	9–4	-0.06	11%	13 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.01	24%	9 Feb →
inferno	11–13	0.00	20%	9 Feb →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	22%	9 Feb →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	18%	8 Feb →
dust2	16–12	0.01	18%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	17%	8 Feb →
dust2	14–16	-0.06	17%	8 Feb →
office	7–13	-0.01	24%	8 Feb →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	25%	8 Feb →
inferno	8–8	0.12	15%	8 Feb →
inferno	9–6	0.02	25%	8 Feb →
inferno	4–9	-0.08	16%	8 Feb →
inferno	9–5	0.04	21%	8 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	33%	6 Feb →
anubis	4–13	-0.11	11%	6 Feb →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	31%	6 Feb →
inferno	4–9	-0.12	36%	6 Feb →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	15%	4 Feb →
ancient	8–13	0.02	23%	4 Feb →
inferno	9–6	0.03	27%	4 Feb →
nuke	5–9	-0.09	26%	2 Feb →
inferno	8–8	-0.06	10%	2 Feb →
vertigo	9–1	0.25	27%	2 Feb →
inferno	9–13	0.01	29%	1 Feb →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	13%	1 Feb →
inferno	4–9	-0.03	27%	1 Feb →
inferno	9–7	-0.01	18%	1 Feb →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	30%	1 Feb →
vertigo	9–2	0.35	19%	1 Feb →
inferno	6–9	-0.06	23%	1 Feb →
nuke	9–4	0.11	13%	1 Feb →
inferno	5–9	-0.09	30%	1 Feb →
inferno	9–2	0.08	19%	1 Feb →
dust2	10–13	0.01	18%	1 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.03	28%	31 Jan →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	15%	31 Jan →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	11%	31 Jan →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	22%	31 Jan →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	16%	31 Jan →
nuke	13–3	0.00	33%	31 Jan →
anubis	7–13	0.00	15%	31 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	29%	31 Jan →
inferno	9–5	0.07	18%	31 Jan →
ancient	13–16	-0.04	12%	30 Jan →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	20%	30 Jan →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	16%	30 Jan →
vertigo	9–5	0.07	24%	30 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.00	23%	30 Jan →
office	13–10	-0.04	25%	29 Jan →
nuke	13–11	0.01	21%	29 Jan →
nuke	2–9	-0.13	20%	29 Jan →
inferno	9–6	0.12	31%	29 Jan →
inferno	7–9	-0.02	17%	29 Jan →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	23%	28 Jan →
nuke	9–5	0.09	21%	28 Jan →
inferno	5–9	-0.08	19%	28 Jan →
nuke	9–5	-0.03	25%	28 Jan →
vertigo	7–9	0.02	20%	28 Jan →
inferno	9–2	0.11	17%	28 Jan →
inferno	7–9	-0.04	24%	28 Jan →
inferno	5–9	-0.15	15%	26 Jan →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	22%	25 Jan →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	21%	25 Jan →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	17%	25 Jan →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	15%	25 Jan →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	19%	25 Jan →
inferno	9–7	-0.08	17%	25 Jan →
inferno	9–1	0.17	35%	25 Jan →
nuke	9–1	0.07	13%	25 Jan →
inferno	7–9	0.07	24%	25 Jan →
nuke	9–7	-0.04	23%	25 Jan →
inferno	9–4	0.19	44%	25 Jan →
nuke	9–2	0.15	16%	25 Jan →
inferno	8–8	0.07	37%	25 Jan →
inferno	9–7	0.07	18%	25 Jan →
inferno	5–9	-0.04	33%	24 Jan →
nuke	9–5	0.01	28%	24 Jan →