BostonCider

BostonCider — CS2 Stats

US76561198338540151[U:1:378274423]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,722Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,629Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,804Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,722 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 20 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,804 +447 20 Jul21 Sept · 40 days played
15,99018,080peak 18,08020 Jul21 Sept
18,278Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-07-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 276 below peak (18,080)
  • +722 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,196 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches8
Win rate75%
K/D0.83
Headshot %56%

Measured 18 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.5%42.7%43.8%4.3% short
Shot accuracy12.5%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.980.991.020.04 short
Match win rate45.4%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBostonCiderFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,804 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning48
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateTWWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility7.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.8
Utility7.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time554ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 23 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 2 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 17 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2381535%-0.02
nukeA1610663%-0.00
mirageB168850%-0.01
dust2C125742%-0.02
ancientS118373%-0.00
cacheB105550%-0.01
anubisD72529%-0.04
vertigo2020%-0.07
office110100%-0.02
train1010%-0.05
debris1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,762Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,946Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
39.5%Headshot %
12.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,606MVPs
1,352Hours (in match)
3,953Bombs planted
701Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,131
AWP5,437
MP92,315
MAC-102,175
FAMAS1,387

Lifetime map wins

6,523inferno
5,109nuke
4,948dust2
2,292vertigo
1,157train
200office
105cbble
55safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

50Matches
44%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
82.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo450%0.6310.0
Nuke20%0.7812.5
Dust21100%1.1416.0
Anubis10%1.2222.0
Inferno10%1.2922.0
Mirage1100%1.6016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
13.3°Preaim
559msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
14.30HE damage / grenade
12.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.28° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9182% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno15–15-0.0111%20 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0416%19 Sept
nuke13–80.0021%19 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0019%19 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0521%19 Sept
inferno13–90.0121%19 Sept
dust29–130.0723%18 Sept
inferno1–13-0.120%18 Sept
dust213–16-0.0117%16 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0714%16 Sept
cache9–13-0.0220%15 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0523%15 Sept
mirage13–6-0.084%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0310%14 Sept
mirage13–9-0.035%13 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0311%13 Sept
cache10–13-0.0512%13 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0221%13 Sept
nuke13–50.0115%12 Sept
dust210–13-0.0211%11 Sept
ancient13–30.0618%9 Sept
nuke16–130.0519%9 Sept
inferno13–160.0222%9 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0611%8 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0210%8 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0113%7 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0210%7 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0116%7 Sept
dust213–8-0.0516%7 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0510%6 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.066%5 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0325%5 Sept
ancient15–150.0114%5 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0712%4 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0620%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0424%30 Aug
nuke13–60.0419%26 Aug
inferno13–60.0322%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0417%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0425%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.0311%23 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0026%23 Aug
inferno6–130.0822%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0514%22 Aug
nuke13–7-0.037%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0012%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0611%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0414%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0814%17 Aug
nuke13–8-0.1011%17 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0723%17 Aug
office13–10-0.028%16 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0818%16 Aug
train4–13-0.0521%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0412%15 Aug
cache13–8-0.0523%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0112%15 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0225%15 Aug
mirage13–110.0617%15 Aug
cache13–40.0316%15 Aug
ancient13–40.029%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0616%15 Aug
dust213–90.0318%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0313%14 Aug
cache1–13-0.0315%11 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0410%11 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0414%11 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0010%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.043%10 Aug
dust213–5-0.0115%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0717%8 Aug
anubis13–60.0118%8 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0218%8 Aug
mirage6–130.0216%2 Aug
nuke15–150.0214%2 Aug
mirage12–120.1015%2 Aug
dust24–130.0336%2 Aug
nuke7–130.0115%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0213%30 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0221%30 Jul
cache9–130.0014%28 Jul
inferno13–50.028%28 Jul
dust26–13-0.0919%28 Jul
cache13–80.0419%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.0415%26 Jul
debris8–8-0.0218%26 Jul
ancient13–60.0713%25 Jul
cache13–110.0021%25 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0511%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0815%24 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0116%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0321%24 Jul
inferno13–100.0310%23 Jul
nuke13–90.1814%23 Jul
inferno11–130.0120%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0218%22 Jul
mirage16–130.0622%21 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0220%21 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0516%21 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0221%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →