Mikko Merikivi

Mikko Merikivi — CS2 Stats

TL76561198338179395[U:1:377913667]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,319Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,396 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 2 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,832 +11 2 Mar12 Jun · 31 days played
18,52021,450peak 21,4502 Mar12 Jun
21,729Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,396Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-03-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,396
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMikko MerikiviFACEITLevel 6 · 1,396 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,396csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning37
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateWWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility5.6
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning3.7
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time667ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 19 Mar
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · ancient, 22 Apr
484msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 5 Mar
13–2Biggest win · cache, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
158In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 76% over 17dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA25141156%-0.00
nukeB23121152%0.00
ancientS1713476%-0.00
dust2C145936%-0.01
mirageA116555%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.00
overpass42250%0.02
cache110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches
63%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
81.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1662%1.1416.8
Mirage1155%0.9715.0
Nuke1080%1.1416.1
Dust2580%1.2416.0
Anubis367%1.3717.3
Ancient30%0.599.0
Vertigo333%1.1116.7
Train2100%0.629.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
659msReaction time
19.6%T opening success
26.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
10.36HE damage / grenade
7.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.631% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.0132%17 Sept
cache13–20.0121%3 Sept
dust25–13-0.0423%31 Aug
ancient8–130.0312%31 Aug
dust29–13-0.0614%12 Jun
nuke13–110.0230%12 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0313%12 Jun
inferno13–100.0328%12 Jun
inferno13–60.0327%12 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0826%29 May
ancient13–9-0.0018%29 May
overpass9–13-0.0110%29 May
inferno13–11-0.0617%27 May
nuke5–13-0.0326%27 May
inferno2–130.0619%9 May
nuke16–14-0.0116%2 May
ancient13–100.0119%2 May
nuke2–13-0.0415%2 May
dust213–60.0727%28 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0620%28 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0118%27 Apr
inferno13–40.0219%27 Apr
ancient13–9-0.036%23 Apr
ancient13–2-0.0725%22 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0715%22 Apr
dust212–16-0.0420%22 Apr
ancient13–30.1447%22 Apr
inferno7–130.0115%19 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0115%19 Apr
mirage13–40.019%13 Apr
inferno13–100.0332%11 Apr
dust213–5-0.0014%11 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0629%11 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0513%11 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0730%11 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0017%11 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0323%10 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0626%10 Apr
anubis13–60.0226%10 Apr
nuke6–130.0321%10 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0217%6 Apr
nuke13–50.0223%6 Apr
nuke13–60.0223%6 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0815%6 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0312%5 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0123%5 Apr
dust24–13-0.0429%3 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0712%3 Apr
nuke13–80.0023%3 Apr
ancient13–70.0118%3 Apr
inferno13–20.0627%3 Apr
nuke8–13-0.018%3 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0027%3 Apr
nuke13–100.0333%29 Mar
dust26–13-0.0229%28 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0922%28 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0216%28 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0019%28 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0327%28 Mar
inferno13–110.0523%28 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0137%27 Mar
nuke7–130.0021%27 Mar
nuke11–130.0138%26 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0518%26 Mar
dust25–13-0.0619%22 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0632%22 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0423%22 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0332%22 Mar
inferno11–130.0425%22 Mar
ancient13–110.0632%22 Mar
dust213–20.0126%21 Mar
inferno13–50.0922%21 Mar
mirage13–160.0127%20 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0220%20 Mar
nuke13–20.1535%19 Mar
anubis13–50.0429%18 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0328%18 Mar
dust25–13-0.0338%18 Mar
mirage13–90.1021%18 Mar
dust211–130.0229%14 Mar
overpass14–160.0517%14 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0126%14 Mar
nuke13–110.0717%14 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0125%7 Mar
dust216–14-0.0116%7 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0323%7 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0023%7 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0916%7 Mar
inferno13–40.0817%6 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0517%6 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0120%6 Mar
nuke13–80.0119%6 Mar
ancient13–110.0024%6 Mar
mirage13–110.0821%5 Mar
inferno13–11-0.049%5 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0215%3 Mar
overpass13–100.0619%3 Mar
dust213–6-0.0217%2 Mar
ancient13–30.0120%2 Mar
dust211–130.0533%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →