can9732

can9732 — CS2 Stats

76561198336608145[U:1:376342417]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,256Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,206Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64661 of 251366 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,779 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,206 +162 26 Aug – 12 Oct · 20 days played
20,79423,603peak 23,60326 Aug12 Oct
24,343Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,779Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,779
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 222 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,397 below peak (23,603)
  • -1,862 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,794 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcan9732FACEITLevel 9 · 1,779 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,206 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,779csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning69
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateTLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility5.1
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time544ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 8–13 · ancient, 15 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · vertigo, 31 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 2 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2814–1450%0.02
nukeC229–1341%0.02
ancientB1910–953%0.03
anubisC83–538%0.03
cacheC73–443%0.04
dust2C52–340%0.03
inferno—42–250%-0.01
vertigo—31–233%0.02
train—11–0100%0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.02
office—10–10%-0.01
italy—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

151Matches
56%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
88.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3543%1.0816.7
Nuke3569%1.6520.3
Ancient2752%1.2617.7
Anubis1650%1.2616.2
Inferno1354%1.2717.5
Overpass1385%1.6820.2
Dust21145%1.2416.4
Cache1100%1.1826.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.8%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
532msReaction time
56.6%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.03HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–150.0728%12 Oct →
ancient6–130.019%12 Oct →
nuke13–50.0323%12 Oct →
ancient13–100.0914%8 Oct →
mirage13–110.0327%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0724%2 Oct →
cache13–100.1216%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0418%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0328%1 Oct →
mirage10–130.0413%1 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0420%1 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0119%26 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.009%25 Sept →
nuke4–130.0340%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.039%23 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0220%23 Sept →
nuke13–70.0419%23 Sept →
mirage6–130.0119%22 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0123%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0218%22 Sept →
mirage1–130.0126%22 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0220%22 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0210%21 Sept →
anubis9–130.038%21 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0118%21 Sept →
anubis13–100.0323%20 Sept →
mirage13–70.0929%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.0319%20 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0318%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0224%20 Sept →
nuke4–60.0738%20 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0326%20 Sept →
nuke9–130.0319%19 Sept →
nuke6–130.0236%19 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0023%15 Sept →
anubis15–150.0620%15 Sept →
nuke13–100.0623%15 Sept →
ancient8–130.1420%15 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0123%15 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.047%13 Sept →
mirage15–150.0522%10 Sept →
mirage16–140.0314%9 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0116%9 Sept →
ancient13–70.0215%9 Sept →
anubis13–160.0410%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0224%8 Sept →
ancient6–130.0220%8 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0121%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0023%7 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.029%7 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.039%7 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0232%7 Sept →
nuke13–110.0116%7 Sept →
dust213–100.0526%7 Sept →
mirage3–130.0638%6 Sept →
train13–100.0222%6 Sept →
overpass13–30.0230%6 Sept →
dust21–130.0118%6 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0821%6 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0218%6 Sept →
anubis13–50.1318%6 Sept →
ancient13–40.0225%6 Sept →
office4–13-0.0144%5 Sept →
mirage13–30.1030%5 Sept →
mirage2–00.000%5 Sept →
italy5–13-0.0014%3 Sept →
nuke13–30.1015%3 Sept →
ancient10–130.0227%3 Sept →
mirage11–130.0914%3 Sept →
nuke10–130.0332%1 Sept →
vertigo1–13-0.0567%31 Aug →
cache6–130.0316%31 Aug →
ancient13–10.0819%31 Aug →
ancient15–150.0619%31 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.110%31 Aug →
ancient3–130.0417%31 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0619%29 Aug →
cache13–50.0830%29 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0129%29 Aug →
mirage16–130.0420%29 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0215%29 Aug →
ancient13–10.0125%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0626%29 Aug →
cache16–140.0417%29 Aug →
dust216–130.0523%28 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0221%28 Aug →
ancient9–130.0221%28 Aug →
inferno13–60.1022%28 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0618%28 Aug →
cache9–130.0637%28 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0016%28 Aug →
nuke8–130.0319%28 Aug →
mirage13–90.0227%27 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0427%27 Aug →
ancient13–70.0618%27 Aug →
nuke9–130.0321%26 Aug →
mirage16–130.0015%26 Aug →
mirage13–60.0113%26 Aug →
nuke13–30.0716%26 Aug →
ancient13–60.0721%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.