Panta Rhoades

Panta Rhoades — CS2 Stats

PT76561198332373524[U:1:372107796]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

874Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,403Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,464 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,464 → 1,464
+1Tracked matches · now 874
+3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 75 days played since 11 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,971 +2,420 4 Dec5 Jul · 32 days played
18,55122,000peak 22,0004 Dec5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,464 +0 29 Aug14 Sept · 2 observations
1,4641,464peak 1,46429 Aug14 Sept
22,072Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,464Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
75Days played since 2025-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,464
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches51+4
Win rate100%0%+100pp
K/D1.140.78+0.36
Headshot %47%57%−10pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.2%45.8%46.8%1.6% short
Shot accuracy13.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.161.051.06above
Match win rate48.3%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPanta RhoadesFACEITLevel 7 · 1,464 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,464csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning61
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44506Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time609ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 27 Apr
63%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · debris, 3 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · dust2, 1 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 17 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36181850%0.03
infernoB21101148%0.03
ancientD103730%0.05
dust2A95456%0.02
nukeD71614%0.00
overpassC52340%0.01
anubis32167%0.06
cache32167%0.00
train21150%0.07
debris1010%-0.04
eldorado1010%0.08
dogtown1010%-0.06
brewery1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

96,998Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,965Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
45.2%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
21,356MVPs
2,403Hours (in match)
6,716Bombs planted
2,762Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,920
AWP11,537
SSG 081,808
FAMAS1,794
P2501,437

Lifetime map wins

4,118inferno
4,032dust2
2,086vertigo
1,783train
958cbble
825nuke
67lake
30office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

389Matches
54%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
88.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6752%1.4917.9
Inferno3468%1.4218.9
Ancient2035%1.2216.7
Dust21856%1.1218.9
Anubis1747%1.2615.8
Overpass683%1.5017.3
Vertigo560%1.3718.4
Cache560%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
611msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.15HE damage / grenade
6.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4403 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8445% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0627%14 Sept
mirage13–100.0418%1 Sept
dust213–60.0141%1 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0122%31 Aug
anubis7–130.0328%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0214%24 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0219%8 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0019%4 Aug
mirage10–130.0725%4 Aug
debris2–9-0.0463%3 Aug
eldorado8–80.0838%3 Aug
cache0–13-0.0819%25 Jul
anubis13–110.0521%23 Jul
dust213–5-0.049%18 Jul
ancient17–190.019%8 Jul
mirage7–130.0010%5 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0516%4 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0514%3 Jul
dust29–130.0236%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0935%29 Jun
dust213–60.1018%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0417%22 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0121%16 Jun
overpass6–130.0520%12 Jun
cache13–90.0826%7 Jun
ancient13–50.0618%7 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0611%3 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0217%30 May
inferno3–130.0124%29 May
dust213–160.0220%29 May
inferno9–13-0.0019%25 May
inferno13–5-0.0118%21 May
inferno11–130.0512%20 May
mirage13–90.0325%19 May
mirage2–13-0.0114%18 May
nuke7–130.0825%18 May
overpass3–13-0.0319%14 May
mirage6–130.0523%14 May
inferno8–80.0944%14 May
dust213–50.1427%13 May
ancient10–130.0216%13 May
inferno9–60.1225%13 May
mirage7–130.0527%13 May
inferno13–100.1116%12 May
dust22–13-0.0824%11 May
mirage13–60.0616%4 May
mirage10–13-0.0619%2 May
nuke4–130.0118%29 Apr
cache13–100.0117%29 Apr
ancient13–70.2523%27 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0319%22 Apr
anubis13–70.1215%3 Apr
dust213–60.0623%29 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0627%25 Mar
mirage13–100.0616%25 Mar
mirage13–60.0222%25 Mar
nuke7–130.0110%19 Mar
mirage13–20.1024%17 Mar
mirage13–60.1125%16 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0517%20 Feb
overpass13–100.0523%13 Feb
inferno16–130.1722%11 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0217%11 Feb
mirage10–130.0214%7 Feb
mirage9–130.0222%7 Feb
nuke13–40.0621%4 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0217%4 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0813%27 Dec
inferno10–13-0.0014%27 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0611%12 Dec
inferno13–110.0522%12 Dec
ancient7–130.0122%11 Dec
mirage13–90.1118%10 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0019%10 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0134%10 Dec
mirage13–70.1619%8 Dec
inferno13–80.0516%4 Dec
inferno8–130.0418%3 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0930%2 Dec
train14–160.0514%27 Nov
inferno6–130.0817%20 Nov
inferno5–10.1245%18 Nov
ancient4–130.0524%13 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0128%16 Sept
overpass13–50.0337%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0017%15 Jul
ancient15–150.0624%3 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0329%3 Jul
inferno13–90.0928%3 Jul
mirage13–70.1714%2 Jul
train13–20.1044%30 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0222%30 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0418%26 Jun
mirage13–30.1421%25 Jun
mirage12–120.0124%19 Jun
mirage13–100.0619%17 Jun
mirage13–50.077%13 Jun
dogtown8–8-0.0626%13 Jun
brewery7–9-0.0226%12 Jun
nuke8–8-0.0114%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →