Aslan40 ☾✰

Aslan40 ☾✰ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198332215437[U:1:371949709]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,882Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,241Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,685 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,685 → 1,685
+23Tracked matches · now 3,882
−1.6ppWin rate · 55.2% → 53.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 25 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,696 -831 2 Mar5 Jul · 13 days played
23,02325,527peak 25,5272 Mar5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,685 +0 27 Aug28 Aug · 2 observations
1,6851,685peak 1,68527 Aug28 Aug
25,553Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,685Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-01-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,685
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 66 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate48.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy13.9%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.051.060.13 short
Match win rate47.2%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAslan40 ☾✰FACEITLevel 7 · 1,685 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,685csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning43
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.6
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time639ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 24 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 19 Jun
461msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · office, 3 Mar
13–0Biggest win · cache, 2 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 5ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC37152241%-0.02
dust2A1810856%-0.01
ancientC135838%-0.02
infernoB105550%-0.01
cacheS98189%-0.01
nukeS550100%0.05
anubisC52340%0.01
office21150%0.05
poseidon1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

182,517Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
9,368Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
48.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
22,780MVPs
5,241Hours (in match)
11,666Bombs planted
2,112Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4760,641
AWP28,507
SSG 084,381
MP92,773
FAMAS2,507

Lifetime map wins

25,264inferno
21,153dust2
7,921office
5,436nuke
4,280vertigo
1,710train
458cbble
329lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,810Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
76.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19149%0.9114.0
Dust212846%0.9915.2
Inferno11253%0.9815.1
Ancient10144%0.9715.6
Anubis5742%0.9014.1
Nuke4353%0.9214.7
Vertigo3447%0.8614.4
Overpass1127%0.8116.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
635msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
11.30HE damage / grenade
13.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.2739% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–16-0.0426%20 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0421%20 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0426%16 Sept
mirage22–200.0424%14 Sept
dust213–8-0.0316%14 Sept
ancient13–80.0515%8 Sept
mirage10–130.0423%8 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0112%8 Sept
cache13–60.0119%8 Sept
cache6–13-0.0224%5 Sept
cache13–7-0.0541%4 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0317%25 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0538%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0710%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0432%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0821%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0815%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0416%9 Aug
inferno13–40.0117%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0317%8 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0022%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0625%2 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0518%2 Aug
dust210–130.0324%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0035%26 Jul
nuke13–30.1621%24 Jul
dust213–40.0525%24 Jul
inferno13–100.1124%24 Jul
dust213–20.0212%17 Jul
dust215–15-0.0218%17 Jul
nuke13–70.0214%17 Jul
dust28–13-0.0617%16 Jul
cache13–30.0729%16 Jul
nuke9–5-0.0613%16 Jul
dust213–50.0523%5 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0023%5 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0726%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0516%5 Jul
cache13–8-0.0323%5 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0438%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0123%5 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0116%5 Jul
anubis13–40.0719%5 Jul
mirage1–130.0012%5 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0317%4 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0318%4 Jul
mirage13–50.0316%4 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0328%3 Jul
inferno10–13-0.059%3 Jul
dust210–13-0.0718%3 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0550%19 Jun
ancient9–13-0.1121%19 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0219%12 Jun
inferno13–11-0.098%6 Jun
ancient13–60.0431%6 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0511%6 Jun
dust213–10-0.0410%6 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0529%5 Jun
anubis13–110.0415%5 Jun
inferno13–90.0123%5 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0126%5 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0732%3 Jun
mirage9–130.0114%3 Jun
anubis3–120.0231%2 Jun
dust213–100.1025%2 Jun
cache13–00.0332%2 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0421%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0320%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0330%1 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0322%1 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0213%23 May
dust23–13-0.0224%23 May
poseidon7–90.0321%23 May
mirage14–160.0219%22 May
mirage1–13-0.0810%20 May
mirage10–13-0.0513%20 May
dust213–8-0.059%20 May
mirage8–13-0.0831%17 May
dust213–10-0.0331%17 May
cache13–5-0.0118%17 May
cache13–9-0.0414%17 May
office13–100.0728%3 Mar
nuke13–110.0928%2 Mar
anubis6–130.0015%2 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0323%2 Mar
mirage13–10.0528%2 Mar
dust213–40.0517%2 Mar
mirage3–130.0116%2 Mar
inferno13–90.0412%2 Mar
dust28–13-0.0919%1 Mar
office12–120.0420%1 Mar
mirage15–150.0218%20 Feb
dust25–13-0.049%6 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0623%1 Feb
dust213–80.0030%1 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0416%1 Feb
ancient13–50.0815%30 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0221%30 Jan
mirage16–14-0.0117%25 Jan
nuke13–70.0323%25 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →