zillu

zillu — CS2 Stats

76561198328862445[U:1:368596717]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,326Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,818Top 50% of 210,006 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,636 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,818 +4,172 12 Sept – 23 Oct · 21 days played
14,64619,212peak 19,21212 Sept23 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,636 +0 2 Sept – 5 Oct · 4 observations
1,6361,636peak 1,6362 Sept5 Oct
19,212Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,636Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,636
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 115 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 394 below peak (19,212)
  • +606 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,182 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzilluFACEITLevel 9 · 1,636 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,818 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,636csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning50
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWLWLWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +8.8pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 468ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.0
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time480ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−8.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · cache, 16 Sept →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 9 Sept →
281msFastest reaction time · 2–2 · nuke, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2814–1450%-0.01
dust2S2014–670%0.01
nukeD134–931%-0.03
anubisS118–373%0.03
cacheA117–464%0.00
ancientB84–450%-0.01
infernoC73–443%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

356Matches
55%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
82.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8357%1.1015.0
Vertigo4556%1.1916.7
Inferno4558%1.1415.2
Ancient4363%1.3217.4
Anubis3563%1.2616.3
Nuke2532%0.9214.0
Dust21753%1.0514.1
Overpass1540%1.2717.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
497msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
12.29HE damage / grenade
9.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.507% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0016%23 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0417%23 Oct →
nuke13–110.1122%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0516%22 Oct →
mirage13–20.0214%22 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0231%20 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0132%15 Oct →
dust213–60.1025%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0221%13 Oct →
dust212–120.0416%12 Oct →
anubis3–10-0.0714%12 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.1114%11 Oct →
ancient13–20.0311%11 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.045%9 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0614%9 Oct →
dust213–30.0417%9 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0915%8 Oct →
dust22–00.000%8 Oct →
mirage2–00.000%8 Oct →
mirage2–130.0133%8 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0322%8 Oct →
nuke2–2-0.040%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0425%7 Oct →
mirage12–120.0432%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0015%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0820%5 Oct →
ancient13–50.0424%4 Oct →
mirage0–8-0.0520%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0324%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0226%3 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0122%3 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0116%3 Oct →
mirage19–160.0516%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0117%3 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0814%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0317%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0321%2 Oct →
mirage12–40.0132%2 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0720%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.0021%1 Oct →
anubis13–30.1317%1 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0114%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.106%30 Sept →
mirage0–12-0.0617%30 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0614%29 Sept →
anubis16–130.0314%28 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0212%28 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0826%27 Sept →
dust213–90.0222%27 Sept →
anubis13–60.0913%24 Sept →
dust213–40.0532%23 Sept →
mirage16–130.0523%23 Sept →
anubis16–140.0815%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0815%22 Sept →
dust213–110.0620%22 Sept →
nuke13–10.0832%22 Sept →
dust213–90.0213%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0415%21 Sept →
dust26–130.0528%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0233%20 Sept →
inferno13–100.0733%20 Sept →
anubis13–60.0229%20 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0215%20 Sept →
mirage16–120.0419%19 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0318%19 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0115%17 Sept →
nuke13–60.1142%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0231%16 Sept →
cache13–90.1635%16 Sept →
anubis8–130.0431%15 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.248%15 Sept →
cache13–70.0419%14 Sept →
mirage4–130.0539%14 Sept →
cache13–70.0522%12 Sept →
mirage13–50.0933%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0621%11 Sept →
mirage6–130.0121%11 Sept →
inferno13–30.0714%11 Sept →
dust20–4-0.150%9 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0415%9 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0456%9 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0615%9 Sept →
mirage7–130.0527%9 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0938%8 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0819%30 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0138%30 Aug →
train3–13-0.0636%30 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0944%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0235%30 Aug →
cache13–90.0037%29 Aug →
vertigo13–20.0147%29 Aug →
mirage13–40.0533%29 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1214%13 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0518%30 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0023%30 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0028%29 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0124%29 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0612%29 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0228%29 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0227%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.