Ziixor

Ziixor — CS2 Stats

NO76561198328569601[U:1:368303873]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,254Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,442 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,526 -2,613 28 Nov – 25 Jun · 3 days played
16,52619,139peak 19,13928 Nov25 Jun
19,139Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,442Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2025-11-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,442
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 58 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZiixorFACEITLevel 9 · 2,442 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,442csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning56
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time625ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+6.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · overpass, 20 May →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · ancient, 31 Jan →
414msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 5 Dec →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD258–1732%-0.00
ancientA1911–858%0.02
nukeA149–564%0.02
infernoD113–827%-0.00
anubisA106–460%-0.02
overpassA106–460%0.02
dust2D51–420%0.01
train—43–175%-0.00
cache—11–0100%0.02
cache_b—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,606Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
79.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19146%1.0016.6
Ancient17851%1.0717.3
Nuke9157%1.0316.6
Anubis8159%1.1016.0
Dust26341%0.8715.2
Overpass6055%1.1217.0
Inferno5551%0.9715.6
Train2556%0.9517.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
627msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
10.82HE damage / grenade
11.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.3037% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0723%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.0720%26 Aug →
ancient13–80.0825%26 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0230%14 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0129%25 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0614%9 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0437%9 Jun →
dust213–80.0349%9 Jun →
mirage13–60.0421%9 Jun →
nuke9–130.0525%8 Jun →
inferno13–60.0228%8 Jun →
mirage13–80.0721%5 Jun →
overpass5–13-0.0524%5 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0118%1 Jun →
ancient10–130.0036%20 May →
nuke13–110.0026%20 May →
overpass13–60.1849%20 May →
nuke10–130.0217%1 May →
mirage16–120.0829%1 May →
cache13–90.0231%1 May →
dust29–13-0.0433%29 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0617%27 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0021%26 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0428%24 Apr →
overpass13–60.0438%22 Apr →
mirage13–160.0329%20 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0333%18 Apr →
inferno7–130.0237%17 Apr →
mirage13–110.1232%16 Apr →
ancient11–130.0032%1 Apr →
nuke16–130.0626%8 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0321%8 Mar →
nuke10–130.0135%2 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0417%2 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0215%28 Feb →
nuke13–70.0445%28 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0316%28 Feb →
overpass13–90.0411%28 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0326%27 Feb →
anubis13–70.0224%27 Feb →
mirage13–70.0233%27 Feb →
overpass15–15-0.0621%26 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0540%18 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0531%18 Feb →
mirage19–22-0.0532%16 Feb →
overpass17–190.0029%11 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.0116%11 Feb →
anubis13–100.0230%3 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0526%3 Feb →
ancient5–130.0328%2 Feb →
ancient13–90.0941%1 Feb →
inferno11–130.1128%31 Jan →
ancient13–10.0664%31 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0313%30 Jan →
nuke13–70.0323%30 Jan →
ancient16–140.0331%30 Jan →
ancient9–130.0124%30 Jan →
anubis13–8-0.0419%29 Jan →
dust29–130.0130%28 Jan →
ancient13–20.036%28 Jan →
inferno2–13-0.0639%28 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0419%24 Jan →
anubis13–16-0.0517%20 Jan →
anubis9–13-0.0532%19 Jan →
overpass13–70.0024%18 Jan →
anubis13–9-0.0322%13 Jan →
inferno1–13-0.0214%9 Jan →
mirage3–13-0.0132%8 Jan →
train16–130.0319%4 Jan →
inferno12–120.0824%19 Dec →
inferno4–13-0.0319%17 Dec →
overpass13–110.0428%17 Dec →
mirage11–130.0432%14 Dec →
nuke9–130.1216%8 Dec →
train16–190.0214%8 Dec →
nuke13–70.0220%8 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0329%7 Dec →
ancient4–13-0.0310%5 Dec →
inferno13–110.0128%5 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0713%4 Dec →
nuke13–5-0.1015%4 Dec →
cache_b13–70.0836%3 Dec →
train13–7-0.0220%30 Nov →
mirage14–16-0.0326%30 Nov →
train13–11-0.0521%30 Nov →
mirage19–16-0.0620%29 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0722%29 Nov →
nuke13–100.0030%28 Nov →
ancient13–8-0.0220%28 Nov →
ancient13–30.0622%28 Nov →
ancient13–70.0320%27 Nov →
dust213–16-0.0015%24 Nov →
ancient16–14-0.0313%24 Nov →
nuke13–20.1424%21 Nov →
ancient13–110.0829%21 Nov →
mirage11–130.0025%20 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0526%19 Nov →
mirage13–80.0436%17 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0217%17 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.016%17 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.