xqus

xqus — CS2 Stats

NO76561197988761221[U:1:28495493]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,409Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,416 → 2,416
+1Tracked matches · now 2,409
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 25 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,948 -573 15 Dec15 Jun · 5 days played
24,99926,521peak 26,52115 Dec15 Jun
26,521Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,416Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2025-11-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,416
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 84 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxqusPEAK ELO2,416csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning55
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58411Last 10058%Win rateLLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.5
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy27.5%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 18 May
56%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 14 Feb
359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 25 May
13–1Biggest win · cache, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 7ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2012860%0.01
anubisS1712571%0.03
ancientD1651131%0.01
mirageB147750%-0.01
cacheS107370%0.03
dust2C83538%-0.02
overpassS770100%0.03
inferno42250%0.01
train32167%0.00
alpine110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,009Matches
55%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8650%1.1217.5
Nuke7069%1.1416.2
Anubis5758%1.1816.4
Overpass4068%1.1417.3
Dust22642%0.8914.6
Mirage2544%0.9715.7
Inferno2560%1.2216.4
Cache2152%1.1517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.9%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
550msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
12.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.6772% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0229%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0211%25 Jul
nuke7–130.0029%24 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0244%24 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0720%24 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0343%24 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0217%24 Jul
dust25–130.0419%23 Jul
cache13–70.0736%23 Jul
nuke13–60.0026%22 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0130%22 Jul
nuke13–20.0744%22 Jul
cache13–10.0618%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0835%22 Jul
anubis8–130.0236%28 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0330%28 Jun
ancient3–13-0.057%15 Jun
ancient8–130.0134%15 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0325%14 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0218%14 Jun
anubis13–60.0335%14 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0118%14 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0120%13 Jun
overpass13–30.0342%13 Jun
anubis6–130.0336%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0228%7 Jun
anubis13–50.0825%5 Jun
nuke13–20.0823%4 Jun
anubis13–90.0934%4 Jun
cache13–70.0124%4 Jun
dust213–9-0.0713%3 Jun
anubis9–130.0327%2 Jun
nuke13–50.0233%31 May
overpass13–80.0232%28 May
anubis8–13-0.0333%27 May
nuke13–90.0045%25 May
anubis13–60.0735%25 May
mirage6–13-0.0441%23 May
anubis3–13-0.0425%23 May
overpass13–50.0015%23 May
anubis13–7-0.0226%23 May
ancient16–130.1220%23 May
anubis13–80.0924%23 May
mirage13–70.0123%22 May
ancient10–130.0035%22 May
cache11–130.0528%21 May
nuke13–8-0.0134%21 May
anubis13–40.2022%18 May
ancient17–190.0227%16 May
anubis13–30.0224%15 May
nuke13–20.0121%15 May
overpass13–70.0230%13 May
nuke9–13-0.0231%12 May
dust26–13-0.0514%12 May
ancient13–100.0620%12 May
cache13–40.0235%10 May
cache13–7-0.0027%10 May
nuke13–60.0732%3 May
alpine13–11-0.0114%29 Apr
cache13–20.0742%29 Apr
cache13–70.0335%29 Apr
cache10–130.0234%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.0650%29 Apr
dust210–13-0.0432%24 Apr
nuke15–150.0132%24 Apr
overpass13–30.1442%22 Apr
dust213–7-0.0127%22 Apr
nuke10–130.0341%2 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0135%2 Mar
inferno13–100.0430%18 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0130%18 Feb
anubis13–70.0531%18 Feb
mirage13–90.0756%14 Feb
inferno1–13-0.108%9 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0619%6 Jan
inferno13–90.1228%6 Jan
dust213–100.0633%6 Jan
mirage13–50.0638%15 Dec
overpass13–10-0.0226%12 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0118%10 Dec
nuke16–140.0120%10 Dec
mirage16–14-0.0120%8 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0313%8 Dec
train16–19-0.0419%8 Dec
nuke13–7-0.0246%8 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0126%6 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0015%6 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0220%4 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0513%4 Dec
dust210–13-0.0415%4 Dec
ancient13–90.0721%4 Dec
ancient10–130.0225%4 Dec
overpass13–9-0.0116%3 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0212%3 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0525%3 Dec
mirage13–90.0218%2 Dec
train13–70.0017%30 Nov
mirage14–16-0.0325%30 Nov
train13–110.0519%30 Nov
ancient13–60.0626%25 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →