j3kie

j3kie — CS2 Stats

UA76561198327980204[U:1:367714476]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,756Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,572 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,572 → 3,572
+1Tracked matches · now 3,756
0.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 31 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,572 +0 29 Aug20 Sept · 6 observations
3,5723,572peak 3,57229 Aug20 Sept
3,572Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-01-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,572
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 428 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGj3kieFACEITLevel 10 · 3,572 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,572csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning59
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5842Last 10058%Win rateLLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −68ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility5.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time511ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy30.1%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.5% → last ⅓ avg 30.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 10 Feb
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 4 Mar
328msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 15 Apr
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 17 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 12nukeWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB20101050%0.01
nukeC1971237%0.01
infernoS1713476%0.02
dust2B137654%0.02
ancientA138562%0.00
overpassS1210283%0.00
mirage32167%0.10
cache1010%-0.01
office110100%-0.01
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,605Matches
59%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
87.8ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient36561%1.2618.3
Anubis30064%1.3217.9
Mirage26458%1.3618.9
Dust220267%1.3818.9
Nuke14061%1.3818.1
Inferno4867%1.4017.5
Vertigo4551%1.2117.5
Train4257%1.2918.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.9%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
515msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
6.63HE damage / grenade
7.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4903 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.2569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–13-0.0126%12 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0124%12 Sept
dust213–16-0.0125%2 Sept
anubis11–130.0229%1 Sept
cache6–13-0.0124%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0245%23 Aug
anubis13–70.0837%22 Aug
mirage11–130.0023%17 Aug
ancient13–20.0620%17 Aug
ancient11–130.0544%17 Aug
anubis13–40.0228%17 Aug
mirage13–100.1433%17 Aug
dust21–8-0.0420%10 May
inferno13–3-0.0219%10 May
nuke7–130.0836%10 May
overpass13–50.0029%9 May
nuke13–8-0.0037%9 May
anubis11–130.0238%8 May
overpass13–9-0.0326%8 May
nuke12–16-0.0122%8 May
nuke13–60.1043%6 May
nuke6–130.0325%22 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0331%22 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0233%21 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0332%21 Apr
dust213–70.1442%21 Apr
dust213–100.0729%18 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0227%18 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0240%17 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0332%17 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0127%15 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0229%15 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0320%15 Apr
dust213–30.1331%5 Apr
office13–6-0.0143%24 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0730%20 Mar
nuke6–130.0335%20 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0023%19 Mar
nuke13–60.0525%19 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0423%19 Mar
inferno13–60.1133%18 Mar
anubis19–170.0229%18 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0423%16 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0524%16 Mar
inferno13–90.1349%14 Mar
overpass13–60.0331%14 Mar
ancient4–13-0.1031%12 Mar
dust213–10-0.0126%12 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0717%12 Mar
anubis11–130.0128%12 Mar
nuke11–130.0429%12 Mar
ancient13–90.0433%12 Mar
inferno13–70.0731%11 Mar
dust213–7-0.0039%11 Mar
inferno13–110.0226%11 Mar
dust25–13-0.0222%11 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0118%11 Mar
anubis13–50.0531%9 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0226%9 Mar
nuke19–170.0331%6 Mar
inferno13–70.0842%6 Mar
nuke13–20.0752%4 Mar
overpass13–80.0126%4 Mar
anubis13–110.0327%2 Mar
inferno13–80.0334%2 Mar
nuke10–130.0224%2 Mar
overpass13–40.0535%25 Feb
overpass13–110.0727%22 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0439%22 Feb
dust210–13-0.0120%22 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0319%18 Feb
overpass13–2-0.0335%18 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0222%18 Feb
inferno13–90.0436%13 Feb
dust213–4-0.0137%13 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0230%13 Feb
dust213–9-0.0029%11 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0424%11 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0123%11 Feb
mirage13–70.1533%10 Feb
inferno13–70.0433%8 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0022%6 Feb
inferno11–130.0031%6 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0018%6 Feb
anubis13–40.0930%5 Feb
overpass13–80.0123%5 Feb
ancient13–20.0226%4 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0419%4 Feb
train4–13-0.0233%4 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0215%4 Feb
dust24–130.0024%4 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0232%3 Feb
anubis13–100.0325%3 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0227%2 Feb
ancient13–20.0535%2 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0222%2 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0528%2 Feb
ancient13–80.0526%2 Feb
dust28–13-0.0537%2 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0526%31 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →