Marix

Marix — CS2 Stats

PROFAVBETLuxembourgRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198176422667[U:1:216156939]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,801Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,296 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,296 → 3,296
+1Tracked matches · now 2,801
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 20 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,296 +0 28 Aug16 Sept · 5 observations
3,2963,296peak 3,29628 Aug16 Sept
3,296Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,296
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 204 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarixFACEITLevel 10 · 3,296 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,296csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning52
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5248Last 10052%Win rateLLWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time535ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 529ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 20 Apr
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 29 May
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 21 Aug
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 29 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB1991047%-0.00
mirageS1611569%0.01
dust2C156940%-0.00
ancientB136746%0.00
overpassS129375%0.03
anubisD113827%-0.02
infernoA74357%-0.00
cacheC52340%-0.03
office220100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,401Matches
58%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
86.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient22470%1.3318.4
Anubis16360%1.4517.9
Mirage14655%1.3718.5
Dust213470%1.4217.7
Nuke5860%1.3217.3
Inferno5256%1.2516.6
Overpass4250%1.5520.9
Vertigo2357%1.2217.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.9%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
519msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.28HE damage / grenade
11.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4519 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.4309% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–13-0.0617%6 Sept
cache1–13-0.125%6 Sept
cache14–9-0.0132%6 Sept
anubis9–130.0217%30 Aug
mirage13–70.0624%30 Aug
cache9–13-0.0323%30 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0126%29 Aug
nuke13–20.0420%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0515%29 Aug
dust29–130.0222%26 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0321%26 Aug
dust213–10-0.0317%23 Aug
cache13–30.0526%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0421%23 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0117%23 Aug
cache7–13-0.0719%23 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0223%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0220%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.0226%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0528%5 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0823%5 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0350%5 Jul
ancient13–30.0243%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.0132%25 Jun
nuke6–13-0.088%25 Jun
ancient16–140.0226%25 Jun
dust213–80.0427%24 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0022%24 Jun
nuke13–70.0224%24 Jun
dust22–13-0.1031%23 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0221%23 Jun
ancient13–110.0623%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0925%20 Jun
mirage13–80.0432%17 Jun
mirage13–90.0927%12 Jun
overpass13–110.0636%11 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0318%11 Jun
overpass13–110.0323%9 Jun
nuke8–130.0123%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0030%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0138%7 Jun
overpass13–2-0.0315%7 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0126%7 Jun
ancient8–130.0226%6 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0435%6 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0524%4 Jun
nuke9–130.0321%4 Jun
mirage19–16-0.0120%3 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0229%3 Jun
mirage5–10.0429%29 May
nuke10–130.0140%29 May
mirage9–16-0.0514%29 May
mirage13–100.0052%29 May
inferno10–13-0.0329%29 May
overpass13–100.1021%28 May
dust213–70.0622%26 May
inferno13–80.0029%26 May
ancient5–13-0.0210%26 May
mirage13–9-0.0416%24 May
overpass13–20.1223%24 May
nuke8–13-0.0123%24 May
ancient8–13-0.0213%23 May
overpass10–130.0120%23 May
mirage13–2-0.0129%22 May
nuke13–10-0.0129%22 May
dust28–130.0227%22 May
overpass13–8-0.0414%21 May
nuke22–18-0.0314%21 May
dust25–13-0.0112%21 May
ancient16–13-0.0012%20 May
nuke13–50.0731%20 May
inferno4–130.0221%19 May
dust28–13-0.0124%19 May
mirage13–6-0.0320%18 May
dust27–130.0230%18 May
overpass13–9-0.0433%18 May
dust21–8-0.1022%10 May
inferno13–30.0417%10 May
nuke7–13-0.0135%10 May
overpass13–50.0526%9 May
nuke13–80.0225%9 May
anubis11–13-0.0115%8 May
overpass13–90.0734%8 May
nuke12–160.0228%8 May
nuke13–6-0.0223%6 May
anubis13–100.0520%21 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0716%21 Apr
dust213–70.0322%21 Apr
mirage13–70.1223%20 Apr
dust213–100.0215%18 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0023%18 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0125%17 Apr
anubis11–130.0336%17 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0813%15 Apr
nuke10–130.0230%15 Apr
inferno13–60.0045%15 Apr
dust213–20.0526%12 Apr
office13–40.0834%24 Mar
office13–60.0726%24 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0414%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →