Dopp1e

Dopp1e — CS2 Stats

ME76561198317799641[U:1:357533913]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,151Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,054Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,531 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,151 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 17 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +1 17 Mar3 Jul · 37 days played
24,51527,579peak 27,57917 Mar3 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,531 +0 11 Sept18 Sept · 3 observations
1,5311,531peak 1,53111 Sept18 Sept
27,794Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,531Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-03-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,531
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 220 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches62+4
Win rate33%50%−17pp
K/D1.120.70+0.42
Headshot %61%56%+5pp

Measured 16 Sep 202622 Sep 2026; previous 9 Sep 2026 → 16 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,860), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.8%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy14.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate44.6%46.3%46.9%2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDopp1eFACEITLevel 8 · 1,531 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,531csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning49
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51472Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time567ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 18 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · dust2, 22 May
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 10 Jun
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 24 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2214864%0.01
mirageC2181338%-0.01
dust2C1881044%-0.00
nukeA127558%-0.03
anubisB84450%-0.02
cacheS65183%-0.00
inferno21150%-0.03
pango21150%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.00
vertigo220100%0.03
mills1010%-0.04
iris1010%-0.07
bridge1010%-0.07
warden1010%0.02
train110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

127,187Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
5,929Matches
44.6%Match win rate
56.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17,794MVPs
4,054Hours (in match)
4,672Bombs planted
1,554Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4743,833
AWP11,186
SSG 083,171
MP92,027
Knife1,859

Lifetime map wins

6,421inferno
4,946dust2
2,578vertigo
1,625nuke
1,613train
378cbble
219lake
144office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,237Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
75.4ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8747%0.9313.9
Ancient4549%0.9314.6
Dust24255%1.0716.5
Inferno3642%0.9014.3
Anubis1932%0.7511.8
Vertigo1060%1.0714.1
Iris922%0.8812.4
Outlaw862%0.9216.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
556msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.04HE damage / grenade
9.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7075% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–4-0.0130%14 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0323%6 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0527%6 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0429%5 Sept
cache13–70.0429%5 Sept
mills9–13-0.0416%5 Sept
nuke13–70.0631%5 Sept
cache13–7-0.0736%30 Aug
ancient13–80.0726%30 Aug
cache13–9-0.0321%22 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0328%22 Aug
ancient3–130.0425%11 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0715%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0131%1 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0419%30 Jun
iris7–13-0.0721%29 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0417%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0134%26 Jun
inferno10–13-0.008%20 Jun
mirage13–40.1626%19 Jun
dust28–13-0.0322%18 Jun
mirage9–130.0218%15 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0423%14 Jun
dust213–90.0232%13 Jun
bridge13–16-0.0725%12 Jun
mirage10–130.0027%11 Jun
dust27–13-0.0423%10 Jun
nuke9–60.0117%10 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0917%10 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0220%10 Jun
pango10–13-0.0519%9 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0247%9 Jun
nuke0–13-0.0620%9 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0133%8 Jun
overpass12–16-0.0320%6 Jun
dust213–30.0315%6 Jun
ancient13–100.0219%6 Jun
vertigo13–20.0422%6 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0428%6 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0514%6 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0310%6 Jun
ancient13–60.0319%5 Jun
anubis7–130.0126%4 Jun
mirage13–10.0713%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0320%4 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0429%4 Jun
ancient0–13-0.1125%4 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0935%3 Jun
dust210–13-0.0025%2 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0017%2 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0328%1 Jun
dust216–130.0316%31 May
ancient13–40.1022%30 May
nuke13–80.0720%30 May
dust213–100.0136%29 May
nuke13–6-0.0034%27 May
ancient13–7-0.0633%25 May
dust213–10-0.0228%23 May
nuke1–13-0.1238%23 May
ancient4–130.0134%22 May
ancient13–110.0322%22 May
dust20–2-0.0150%22 May
anubis13–6-0.0524%19 May
dust212–160.0122%19 May
mirage5–13-0.1221%18 May
ancient13–10-0.0917%17 May
ancient13–70.0624%16 May
dust213–1-0.0233%16 May
ancient1–13-0.0531%11 May
mirage6–13-0.0411%11 May
anubis13–8-0.0432%10 May
dust216–140.0222%9 May
cache13–70.0620%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0118%29 Apr
cache13–4-0.0233%29 Apr
mirage11–130.0126%26 Apr
dust24–130.0124%25 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0320%24 Apr
ancient13–60.0020%22 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0428%21 Apr
ancient13–60.1823%18 Apr
dust212–120.0231%11 Apr
mirage7–130.0134%10 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0337%4 Apr
ancient13–40.0513%24 Mar
warden5–130.0224%24 Mar
ancient13–00.1144%24 Mar
train13–11-0.0232%24 Mar
vertigo13–10.0312%24 Mar
anubis13–30.0727%24 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0521%23 Mar
overpass10–130.0328%20 Mar
ancient7–130.0019%18 Mar
dust211–13-0.0127%18 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0513%18 Mar
mirage13–50.0423%18 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0219%17 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0426%17 Mar
pango13–40.0133%17 Mar
dust216–14-0.0635%17 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →