IG: jkb_chb

IG: jkb_chb — CS2 Stats

DE76561198316823186[U:1:356557458]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

973Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,019Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,086Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 916 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,086 -1,935 12 Sept – 23 Oct · 23 days played
16,08619,559peak 19,55912 Sept23 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
916Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-09-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 916
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,473 below peak (19,559)
  • -1,165 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,914 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate34.5%42.7%43.8%9.2% short
Shot accuracy14.8%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.090.991.02above
Match win rate35.9%43.9%44.7%8.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIG: jkb_chbFACEITLevel 4 · 916 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,086 · Purple bandPEAK ELO916csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning52
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −90ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time656ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 23 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 8–6 · rush_001, 2 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 18 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315–865%0.00
dust2B1910–953%0.02
nukeS1812–667%0.00
cacheB115–645%0.02
infernoC114–736%-0.01
anubisD81–713%-0.01
ancientD51–420%-0.02
rush_001—21–150%0.04
train—11–0100%0.04
shelter—11–0100%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

253,283Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12,684Matches
35.9%Match win rate
34.5%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
27,573MVPs
4,019Hours (in match)
5,926Bombs planted
1,684Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4789,008
AWP48,533
Knife5,739
SSG 085,118
SG 5533,593
P2503,530

Lifetime map wins

15,895dust2
10,617inferno
3,713nuke
2,629vertigo
2,255cbble
1,935lake
1,356train
719office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
89.4ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

18%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.2420.3
Dust2667%1.2119.2
Ancient250%1.0613.0
Anubis20%1.2118.0
Inferno2100%1.8614.5
Overpass250%0.6510.0
Vertigo1100%1.608.0
Nuke1100%1.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
70.7%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
657msReaction time
59.9%T opening success
25.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
13.53HE damage / grenade
5.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 25.8899% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0314%24 Oct →
nuke8–1-0.0113%24 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0117%24 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0721%24 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0311%24 Oct →
mirage13–100.0218%24 Oct →
mirage11–130.0119%23 Oct →
dust213–40.1512%23 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0119%23 Oct →
dust213–20.0522%23 Oct →
dust213–50.0318%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0413%23 Oct →
train13–60.0416%22 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0816%17 Oct →
anubis8–130.0315%17 Oct →
cache4–130.0712%17 Oct →
anubis11–130.0118%15 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0322%13 Oct →
inferno13–110.0815%13 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0317%13 Oct →
shelter13–11-0.0115%12 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0121%12 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0129%11 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0514%11 Oct →
anubis8–130.017%10 Oct →
cache13–70.0211%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0216%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0626%10 Oct →
dust25–130.0417%9 Oct →
anubis13–70.039%9 Oct →
rush_0013–7-0.0220%9 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0418%9 Oct →
dust213–50.0628%9 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0121%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0310%9 Oct →
dust213–40.0512%9 Oct →
nuke15–150.0416%9 Oct →
cache16–140.0113%8 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.037%8 Oct →
ancient9–130.0211%8 Oct →
nuke13–100.0414%8 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0213%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.0214%8 Oct →
cache13–60.029%7 Oct →
mirage5–130.0229%4 Oct →
cache11–130.0115%4 Oct →
dust28–130.0125%3 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.019%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0215%3 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0910%3 Oct →
mirage13–10.1115%3 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.080%3 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0117%3 Oct →
inferno13–110.0320%3 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0011%2 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0110%2 Oct →
nuke7–130.024%2 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0017%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0519%2 Oct →
rush_0018–60.1132%2 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.009%2 Oct →
nuke16–140.0319%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0323%2 Oct →
mirage13–100.0823%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0310%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0313%2 Oct →
dust213–50.077%2 Oct →
anubis10–130.0116%1 Oct →
cache11–130.0510%1 Oct →
mirage9–130.0321%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.1023%1 Oct →
nuke13–70.0722%27 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0126%26 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0121%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.0515%26 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.010%26 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.043%26 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0715%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0714%26 Sept →
dust213–60.1119%26 Sept →
nuke13–10.0125%26 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.049%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0218%25 Sept →
mirage13–100.0010%25 Sept →
dust213–6-0.027%24 Sept →
nuke7–130.0417%24 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0516%20 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0417%18 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0517%18 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0215%18 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0513%17 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0711%13 Sept →
nuke13–40.0318%13 Sept →
cache13–90.0321%12 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0815%12 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0230%12 Sept →
nuke9–6-0.0817%12 Sept →
inferno9–40.0414%12 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0020%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0530%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.