kgmkat

kgmkat — CS2 Stats

DK76561198316522398[U:1:356256670]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,119Tracked matches42%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,716Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,577Light Blue band · top ~61.7% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 8,577 → 8,577
+7Tracked matches · now 2,119
−3.8ppWin rate · 46.2% → 42.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,577 -2,465 28 Jul – 22 Sept · 21 days played
8,57711,063peak 11,06328 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 865 +0 31 Aug – 22 Sept · 3 observations
865865peak 86531 Aug22 Sept
11,063Peak Premier in tracked matches
865Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,486 below peak (11,063)
  • -1,423 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,423 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches9——
Win rate33%——
K/D1.40——
Headshot %36%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches67——
Win rate34%——
K/D1.01——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate37.3%39.9%41.9%4.7% short
Shot accuracy7.5%7.0%9.6%2.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.840.920.980.14 short
Match win rate41.5%42.3%43.8%2.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkgmkatPREMIER8,577 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO865csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning64
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–52–8Last 10040%Win rateLLWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility4.7
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact2.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 4 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 24 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 25 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7cacheWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2514–1156%-0.02
dust2D236–1726%-0.00
mirageD144–1029%0.00
cacheD102–820%0.02
nukeB105–550%0.01
ancientC83–538%0.01
anubisS75–271%0.03
overpass—10–10%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.12
italy—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

61,671Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
4,389Matches
41.5%Match win rate
37.3%Headshot %
7.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Light Blue band
8,337MVPs
1,515Hours (in match)
2,936Bombs planted
726Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-475,441
SG 5535,083
AWP4,043
AUG2,058
MAC-101,970
FAMAS1,470

Lifetime map wins

7,256inferno
5,045nuke
4,774dust2
1,610vertigo
883office
686train
411italy
114assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches
40%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
71.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1741%0.8312.3
Ancient1346%0.8814.2
Nuke1233%0.8913.3
Anubis850%0.699.6
Inferno633%0.7211.8
Dust2540%0.6512.0
Overpass20%0.6015.5
Cache250%1.1016.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
557msReaction time
60.4%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
13.28HE damage / grenade
3.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4435 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–130.0217%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0615%30 Sept →
inferno13–110.1011%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0311%28 Sept →
inferno11–130.1314%28 Sept →
cache10–130.0114%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0115%23 Sept →
ancient11–130.0213%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0214%22 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0115%21 Sept →
inferno9–3-0.049%21 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0327%21 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0024%21 Sept →
nuke13–30.0430%20 Sept →
cache13–110.0119%20 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0426%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0518%17 Sept →
anubis11–130.015%15 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0114%15 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.038%15 Sept →
inferno12–120.0212%14 Sept →
ancient14–160.0210%14 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0129%10 Sept →
inferno13–80.0417%10 Sept →
dust213–100.0619%9 Sept →
dust22–130.0131%9 Sept →
dust212–120.0313%7 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.038%7 Sept →
overpass7–90.0324%7 Sept →
vertigo9–50.1215%7 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0213%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0119%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0718%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0135%6 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0713%6 Sept →
nuke11–130.0219%5 Sept →
dust211–130.0116%4 Sept →
italy7–130.057%4 Sept →
cache13–40.1912%4 Sept →
nuke13–50.027%4 Sept →
mirage9–130.0423%4 Sept →
inferno0–11-0.0520%4 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0814%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0513%4 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.018%4 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0714%4 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0010%4 Sept →
dust26–130.0316%4 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0214%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0220%4 Sept →
dust213–70.0121%4 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1014%1 Sept →
dust213–110.0117%31 Aug →
cache10–130.0619%31 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0727%31 Aug →
mirage7–130.0814%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.1114%30 Aug →
dust210–130.0110%30 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0114%29 Aug →
anubis13–20.0321%29 Aug →
anubis13–90.0722%29 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0510%29 Aug →
inferno13–80.0311%28 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0130%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.1324%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0111%28 Aug →
mirage11–130.0012%28 Aug →
nuke8–130.0625%28 Aug →
nuke11–130.0812%27 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0312%27 Aug →
anubis13–100.0517%27 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0212%27 Aug →
cache9–130.0416%26 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.2114%25 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0918%24 Aug →
inferno9–5-0.0313%24 Aug →
inferno9–20.1737%24 Aug →
anubis6–130.0110%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0331%23 Aug →
ancient9–130.0614%23 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0313%17 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0619%6 Aug →
dust26–13-0.1024%6 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0631%5 Aug →
dust213–30.0623%5 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0214%5 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0414%5 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0117%4 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0528%3 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0122%3 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0611%3 Aug →
anubis13–50.0824%3 Aug →
mirage13–110.0310%1 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0317%31 Jul →
nuke13–70.0411%30 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0612%30 Jul →
inferno9–130.0111%28 Jul →
dust213–80.0111%28 Jul →
nuke5–9-0.109%28 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0413%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.