rentner

rentner — CS2 Stats

DE76561198316090861[U:1:355825133]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,143Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,998Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,756Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81275 of 233077 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,967 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 11 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,756 -202 28 Aug16 Sept · 9 days played
17,49220,868peak 20,86828 Aug16 Sept
20,868Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,967Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
11Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,967
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,112 below peak (20,868)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 244 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate54.3%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy15.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.090.09 short
Match win rate41.7%46.9%48.4%6.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrentnerFACEITLevel 9 · 1,967 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,756 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,967csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning49
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 744ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 1352 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time589ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 12–12 · dust2, 16 Sept
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 15 Sept
383msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · office, 12 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W5Current streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 50% over 42
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B42212150%-0.01
mirageA169756%-0.01
cacheB137654%-0.00
infernoA106460%0.01
overpass41325%-0.00
anubis41325%-0.02
vertigo31233%-0.00
ancient32167%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.04
office1010%-0.08
fachwerk1010%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 42). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

291,822Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
11,666Matches
41.7%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
29,658MVPs
4,998Hours (in match)
6,933Bombs planted
2,021Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47102,795
AWP38,047
SSG 0812,115
P2504,156
FAMAS3,969

Lifetime map wins

31,057dust2
16,741inferno
2,744vertigo
2,445nuke
1,893lake
1,811train
1,673office
1,593cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

928Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
82.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3256%0.9513.9
Dust22050%1.2317.8
Anubis1250%0.9617.5
Inferno1173%0.9415.6
Ancient633%0.8215.5
Vertigo540%1.1019.2
Nuke520%0.9617.8
Cache367%1.4321.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
6.8°Preaim
583msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
8.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.3484% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–4-0.0026%20 Sept
dust213–4-0.0128%20 Sept
dust25–10.1136%20 Sept
cache13–70.0320%20 Sept
cache13–11-0.0136%16 Sept
inferno4–130.0330%16 Sept
vertigo2–130.0320%16 Sept
dust212–120.1723%16 Sept
dust20–5-0.060%16 Sept
mirage13–80.0016%16 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0517%16 Sept
dust213–90.0718%15 Sept
mirage13–20.0317%15 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0517%15 Sept
dust213–40.0321%15 Sept
dust23–13-0.1114%15 Sept
dust213–3-0.0223%15 Sept
dust24–110.0228%15 Sept
dust213–9-0.0558%15 Sept
dust212–12-0.0725%15 Sept
dust24–13-0.0825%15 Sept
dust29–13-0.1223%14 Sept
mirage5–13-0.1220%14 Sept
overpass9–13-0.0226%14 Sept
cache10–13-0.0627%14 Sept
dust213–60.0929%14 Sept
dust23–130.0146%14 Sept
cache9–130.0136%14 Sept
overpass12–12-0.0314%14 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0419%14 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0323%14 Sept
dust215–15-0.0220%14 Sept
anubis8–1-0.0233%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0613%14 Sept
dust213–110.0225%14 Sept
inferno13–40.0229%14 Sept
cache16–140.0125%14 Sept
dust213–80.0235%14 Sept
dust213–8-0.0028%14 Sept
dust210–130.0313%14 Sept
dust27–13-0.0517%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0816%13 Sept
mirage7–10.0638%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.1010%13 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0120%13 Sept
inferno14–160.0219%13 Sept
cache16–140.0134%13 Sept
inferno4–10.0757%13 Sept
mirage11–13-0.1016%13 Sept
ancient2–13-0.100%13 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0114%13 Sept
dust29–13-0.0233%13 Sept
inferno13–60.0125%13 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0218%13 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0741%12 Sept
dust22–13-0.0633%12 Sept
office2–13-0.0823%12 Sept
cache4–13-0.0127%12 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0326%12 Sept
mirage13–20.1025%12 Sept
ancient13–110.1128%12 Sept
dust23–13-0.0124%12 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0228%12 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0826%12 Sept
inferno9–130.0225%12 Sept
dust24–130.0621%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0117%12 Sept
dust21–13-0.0316%11 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0127%11 Sept
anubis8–13-0.059%11 Sept
mirage13–30.1522%11 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0517%11 Sept
dust211–13-0.0330%11 Sept
dust213–8-0.1130%11 Sept
cache12–120.0016%11 Sept
dust213–80.0427%11 Sept
dust213–8-0.0213%11 Sept
cache13–9-0.0223%10 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0126%10 Sept
dust213–70.0017%10 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0116%10 Sept
dust26–13-0.0630%10 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0132%10 Sept
dust213–10-0.0121%10 Sept
dust213–11-0.0031%9 Sept
cache6–13-0.0124%9 Sept
cache8–130.0636%9 Sept
vertigo8–13-0.0330%9 Sept
overpass13–6-0.0426%9 Sept
dust213–90.0122%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0212%9 Sept
dust213–9-0.0420%8 Sept
cache13–60.0132%8 Sept
overpass12–120.0922%8 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0319%8 Sept
dust213–3-0.0227%8 Sept
dust213–80.0424%8 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0034%8 Sept
fachwerk12–120.0829%8 Sept
mirage4–13-0.1013%7 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →