-D0llan_

-D0llan_ — CS2 Stats

IS76561198315945862[U:1:355680134]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

454Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,187Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 454 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 21 Jan 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,930 +1,919 5 Apr4 Jun · 7 days played
12,01113,930peak 13,9305 Apr4 Jun
13,930Peak Premier in tracked matches
58Days played since 2023-01-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.7%42.7%43.8%1.1% short
Shot accuracy21.3%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.001.020.16 short
Match win rate60.7%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-D0llan_FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateLWLLTTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.2

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 696ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time706ms+72ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 706ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 31 Mar
43%Best headshot accuracy · 11–4 · overpass, 1 Apr
445msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 9 Sept
16–3Biggest win · mirage, 31 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
24Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1551033%-0.02
mirageC156940%-0.01
overpassS1410471%-0.01
nukeS128467%-0.03
anubisC83538%-0.01
ancientA85363%-0.01
vertigoC83538%-0.02
dust2C73443%0.00
officeB63350%-0.01
train21150%-0.01
agency2020%-0.04
cache1010%0.04
edin1010%-0.07
tuscan1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,186Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
2,076Matches
60.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 4 players
42.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
21.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 4 players
7,640MVPs
1,187Hours (in match)
1,583Bombs planted
1,896Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,969
AWP5,630
FAMAS1,449
Knife1,104
P2501,017

Lifetime map wins

3,800inferno
3,744dust2
3,303nuke
3,016vertigo
1,664train
541cbble
164office
103assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

715Matches
49%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
83.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1155%1.5216.3
Inferno560%0.8213.0
Nuke560%0.8314.2
Ancient333%1.0315.7
Anubis30%0.6611.0
Dust2333%1.0519.3
Overpass1100%0.9314.0
Cache10%0.7110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
696msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
10.65HE damage / grenade
5.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.6685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–130.0122%16 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0414%19 Jul
nuke8–130.0117%19 Jul
ancient9–130.0323%18 Jul
inferno8–8-0.1117%27 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0232%27 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0018%4 Jun
anubis13–30.0226%4 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0916%4 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0114%31 May
anubis10–13-0.0911%28 May
dust29–120.0319%26 May
nuke2–13-0.107%25 May
mirage3–130.0229%10 May
anubis13–110.0417%9 May
inferno6–13-0.1023%9 May
inferno9–13-0.0517%9 May
nuke7–13-0.0118%8 May
mirage11–130.0520%8 May
nuke13–6-0.0919%7 May
anubis8–130.0015%7 May
inferno11–130.0315%5 May
cache11–130.0418%3 May
nuke13–10-0.0318%3 May
overpass13–80.0318%26 Apr
ancient13–60.0316%26 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0615%26 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0910%26 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0124%26 Apr
train13–70.0227%26 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0135%25 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0114%25 Apr
dust211–130.0319%20 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0727%19 Mar
overpass6–13-0.059%25 Jan
mirage5–11-0.0814%17 Jan
overpass13–100.0015%16 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0431%16 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0319%16 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0326%16 Jan
ancient6–130.0019%16 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0616%16 Jan
train10–13-0.0414%27 Apr
inferno9–70.0920%27 Apr
mirage13–50.1532%26 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0516%25 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0110%16 Feb
vertigo5–9-0.1233%16 Feb
anubis9–130.0312%16 Feb
edin5–13-0.0710%2 Feb
dust23–13-0.0616%2 Feb
office11–130.0021%14 Oct
overpass9–7-0.1213%14 Oct
nuke13–80.023%29 Apr
anubis13–70.0226%5 Apr
mirage13–160.0221%3 Apr
overpass13–40.1024%3 Apr
mirage2–13-0.1223%2 Apr
overpass11–40.0243%1 Apr
inferno13–40.1622%31 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0526%23 Sept
nuke13–80.0118%9 Sept
mirage9–30.0715%6 Sept
vertigo3–9-0.048%25 Aug
dust29–40.007%24 May
ancient16–12-0.032%6 Apr
overpass16–110.0112%6 Apr
vertigo16–90.018%6 Apr
mirage8–8-0.0330%6 Apr
inferno8–16-0.0722%5 Apr
dust20–9-0.1414%3 Apr
office9–2-0.0110%3 Apr
ancient25–22-0.0014%3 Apr
inferno6–16-0.0422%2 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0511%30 Mar
vertigo16–13-0.0213%30 Mar
vertigo16–70.0120%21 Mar
dust29–40.0214%17 Mar
agency3–9-0.0910%17 Mar
office9–40.0522%15 Mar
agency5–90.0116%15 Mar
dust29–50.1120%15 Mar
inferno16–100.0217%1 Mar
mirage10–16-0.089%17 Feb
office9–10.0017%17 Feb
mirage9–50.0317%16 Feb
office8–8-0.0316%16 Feb
tuscan6–9-0.0420%16 Feb
vertigo8–80.0614%13 Feb
vertigo14–16-0.0112%6 Feb
overpass16–11-0.0611%5 Feb
ancient19–16-0.049%5 Feb
overpass16–9-0.0514%1 Feb
overpass16–11-0.048%31 Jan
mirage16–30.0122%31 Jan
office10–16-0.0923%31 Jan
nuke2–160.0310%31 Jan
overpass14–160.0014%30 Jan
vertigo13–16-0.0218%22 Jan
overpass19–150.0321%21 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →