TwinN — CS2 Stats

NL76561198311373700[U:1:351107972]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,774Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongAggressive Rifler

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning71

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63–32–5Last 10063%Win rateWWWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2

Aggression10.0

Utility4.4

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch1.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning7.1

Utility4.4

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels5.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.07

Reaction time557ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms

Headshot accuracy25.8%+3.6%

first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — anubis 13–4

13–1Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

8–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

strongholdBest map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 47% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	16	11–5	69%	0.07
cache	B	15	7–8	47%	0.06
mirage	A	11	6–5	55%	0.03
nuke	S	10	7–3	70%	0.08
ancient	A	8	5–3	63%	0.07
boulder	B	6	3–3	50%	0.06
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	0.08
stronghold	S	5	4–1	80%	0.14
shelter	—	4	4–0	100%	0.10
alpine	—	4	3–1	75%	0.07
overpass	—	4	4–0	100%	0.07
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	0.05
fachwerk	—	3	2–1	67%	0.08
sanctum	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.13
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

337Matches

65%Win rate

1.90Avg K/D

114.9ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win

34%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	14	79%	2.36	23.8
Inferno	9	67%	1.81	22.1
Mirage	8	38%	1.44	19.1
Outlaw	5	100%	2.22	23.0
Nuke	5	80%	2.12	24.0
Anubis	4	25%	1.63	21.3
Cache	3	67%	1.81	22.0
CONTEST Jura	3	67%	1.89	27.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy

39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.6%Spray accuracy

88.1%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

549msReaction time

38.5%T opening success

61.8%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

6.8%Flash assists

10.43HE damage / grenade

6.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3754 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.538% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–10	0.11	18%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.11	24%	28 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.12	37%	28 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.07	31%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	19%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.12	22%	9 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.11	17%	9 Aug →
fachwerk	13–10	0.04	19%	2 Aug →
boulder	13–10	0.06	30%	2 Aug →
shelter	13–6	0.01	29%	2 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.12	27%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.06	36%	2 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.16	23%	27 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.00	24%	27 Jul →
shelter	13–11	0.16	25%	25 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	23%	25 Jul →
boulder	4–13	-0.05	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	28%	23 Jul →
boulder	12–12	0.03	25%	23 Jul →
shelter	13–5	0.08	26%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	27%	15 Jul →
boulder	13–2	0.19	27%	15 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.16	38%	15 Jul →
boulder	13–9	0.09	21%	10 Jul →
fachwerk	13–10	0.07	25%	10 Jul →
boulder	10–13	0.02	24%	10 Jul →
fachwerk	6–13	0.12	25%	8 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	28%	6 Jul →
alpine	13–5	0.15	22%	6 Jul →
alpine	13–5	0.04	37%	6 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	33%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.07	25%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.08	21%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.13	24%	1 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.01	22%	1 Jul →
overpass	13–7	0.11	25%	30 Jun →
nuke	8–1	0.04	33%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.05	17%	30 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.05	29%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.05	22%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.10	31%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.11	32%	26 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.12	15%	26 Jun →
anubis	4–13	0.00	22%	7 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.05	16%	7 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.03	31%	7 Jun →
sanctum	9–5	0.12	30%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.11	27%	7 Jun →
warden	13–9	0.08	39%	28 May →
anubis	13–4	0.25	35%	28 May →
nuke	9–6	0.01	19%	21 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	24%	21 May →
ancient	13–6	0.09	23%	21 May →
inferno	8–13	0.06	29%	21 May →
cache	13–4	0.07	25%	17 May →
alpine	3–13	-0.03	14%	17 May →
alpine	13–1	0.13	13%	13 May →
stronghold	13–2	0.24	38%	13 May →
ancient	4–13	0.06	22%	13 May →
cache	8–13	0.02	22%	13 May →
cache	13–8	0.12	29%	6 May →
cache	12–12	0.01	21%	6 May →
inferno	13–11	0.09	26%	29 Apr →
cache	5–13	0.02	24%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	0.08	18%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.18	21%	29 Apr →
cache	5–13	0.04	23%	28 Apr →
cache	9–13	0.04	27%	28 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.06	12%	26 Apr →
stronghold	13–6	0.07	18%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.08	24%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.02	15%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.01	20%	23 Apr →
inferno	8–13	0.11	15%	22 Apr →
overpass	16–14	0.07	25%	22 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.04	13%	22 Apr →
nuke	12–16	0.11	28%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.01	24%	17 Apr →
dust2	8–13	0.01	26%	17 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.12	17%	17 Apr →
dust2	6–13	0.09	25%	2 Apr →
inferno	13–5	0.09	28%	1 Apr →
ancient	13–1	0.04	25%	1 Apr →
vertigo	13–11	0.13	18%	30 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	21%	25 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.10	33%	25 Mar →
poseidon	8–8	0.04	27%	25 Mar →
dust2	5–13	0.00	21%	25 Mar →
stronghold	12–12	0.09	22%	22 Mar →
overpass	13–11	0.05	21%	22 Mar →
inferno	13–10	0.07	26%	22 Mar →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	13%	19 Mar →
stronghold	8–0	0.16	12%	18 Mar →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	24%	18 Mar →
office	11–13	0.07	18%	18 Mar →
inferno	13–7	0.01	22%	17 Mar →
nuke	13–5	0.14	33%	17 Mar →
stronghold	13–5	0.13	32%	12 Mar →
overpass	13–6	0.06	23%	11 Mar →