Lukyvald

Lukyvald — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198255116130[U:1:294850402]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

863Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
10,367Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 863
−2.0ppWin rate · 48.1% → 46.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,756 -205 12 Jun2 Jul · 8 days played
14,02015,565peak 15,56512 Jun2 Jul
15,565Peak Premier in tracked matches
908Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.8%45.7%46.8%6.0% short
Shot accuracy13.0%12.7%13.0%meets
Kill/death ratio0.811.051.060.25 short
Match win rate34.2%45.7%46.3%12.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLukyvaldFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO908csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning46
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY434710Last 10043%Win rateWTLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 5123 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact3.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time626ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–5 · debris, 18 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · warden, 28 May
422msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · ancient, 2 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

alpineBest map · 83% over 6debrisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC114736%-0.02
nukeC114736%0.00
ancientC94544%-0.04
poseidonA74357%0.03
infernoD72529%-0.02
debrisD61517%-0.02
anubisS64267%-0.01
mirageS64267%-0.01
alpineS65183%-0.01
vertigoD51420%-0.02
trainC52340%-0.02
dust241325%-0.00
office41325%-0.00
eldorado31233%0.01
overpass330100%0.03
shelter2020%0.00
boulder2020%0.00
warden220100%-0.00
fachwerk1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

89,292Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
5,066Matches
34.2%Match win rate
40.8%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
8,766MVPs
1,915Hours (in match)
2,500Bombs planted
831Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,618
AWP8,624
Knife3,588
SSG 082,420
MP91,776

Lifetime map wins

2,995nuke
2,744vertigo
2,227inferno
1,404dust2
923train
915office
445cbble
198italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

139Matches
54%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
74.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2357%1.0015.3
Inferno1060%0.9215.5
Nuke967%1.0919.2
Dust2757%0.9415.1
Overpass667%1.3315.8
Ancient580%0.8412.8
CONTEST Canopy475%0.629.3
Cache333%0.6912.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
589msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
5.90HE damage / grenade
13.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2551° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3695% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4584 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon9–20.1025%12 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0413%12 Sept
debris7–90.0729%9 Sept
eldorado7–9-0.093%9 Sept
debris5–9-0.1415%16 Aug
eldorado9–20.0935%16 Aug
train13–7-0.0013%12 Aug
train13–8-0.0010%12 Aug
train3–13-0.023%12 Aug
train3–13-0.073%12 Aug
shelter6–13-0.0921%6 Aug
train7–130.019%6 Aug
boulder11–13-0.0425%6 Aug
cache4–13-0.0410%30 Jul
debris6–9-0.1610%29 Jul
poseidon4–9-0.0727%29 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0111%29 Jul
vertigo10–130.0415%29 Jul
cache12–12-0.0412%22 Jul
anubis13–11-0.058%22 Jul
anubis5–130.032%22 Jul
debris9–50.1221%18 Jul
poseidon9–30.0613%18 Jul
shelter9–130.0915%17 Jul
boulder12–120.059%17 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0610%17 Jul
debris8–8-0.047%9 Jul
poseidon9–70.1218%9 Jul
debris8–80.0521%9 Jul
eldorado6–90.0419%9 Jul
cache8–130.0117%9 Jul
dust213–0-0.0221%9 Jul
fachwerk6–130.0424%8 Jul
office13–110.0412%8 Jul
office5–13-0.0620%8 Jul
cache13–9-0.0413%6 Jul
alpine13–5-0.0213%6 Jul
alpine13–50.0324%6 Jul
alpine13–6-0.0214%6 Jul
ancient13–16-0.036%2 Jul
inferno13–40.0522%2 Jul
cache10–13-0.0415%1 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0715%1 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0210%1 Jul
cache4–13-0.058%1 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0319%1 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0427%1 Jul
poseidon9–20.0133%1 Jul
cache10–13-0.0211%1 Jul
cache10–40.0014%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0123%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.007%30 Jun
nuke5–130.0123%30 Jun
ancient14–16-0.057%30 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0314%30 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0214%28 Jun
ancient13–10-0.087%27 Jun
mirage16–120.008%27 Jun
overpass13–110.0012%27 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0811%27 Jun
alpine2–13-0.0910%27 Jun
nuke9–3-0.013%27 Jun
office11–130.0420%26 Jun
alpine13–7-0.0410%26 Jun
mirage13–70.0518%26 Jun
mirage13–8-0.046%26 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0018%26 Jun
nuke6–130.0613%26 Jun
nuke13–40.0816%25 Jun
inferno8–130.0123%25 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0516%24 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0214%24 Jun
dust28–130.0115%24 Jun
poseidon5–90.0417%24 Jun
warden13–80.0010%24 Jun
nuke12–120.0918%18 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0713%17 Jun
cache8–130.0131%16 Jun
dust217–190.0110%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.039%15 Jun
mirage11–130.0114%13 Jun
overpass13–40.0915%13 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0415%12 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0112%12 Jun
inferno7–13-0.1025%8 Jun
ancient5–13-0.076%8 Jun
nuke0–13-0.080%5 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0512%5 Jun
nuke8–80.0915%5 Jun
inferno15–15-0.037%3 Jun
poseidon7–9-0.0326%3 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0311%3 Jun
warden13–9-0.0139%28 May
anubis13–4-0.020%28 May
anubis13–80.000%28 May
anubis13–11-0.0210%28 May
cache13–20.020%21 May
cache13–11-0.087%21 May
office12–12-0.030%13 May
alpine13–10.098%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →