komeebro

komeebro — CS2 Stats

MN76561198311335669[U:1:351069941]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

651Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,363Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 10 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +2,235 10 Apr19 Sept · 16 days played
11,03215,916peak 15,91610 Apr19 Sept
16,283Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-04-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 916 below peak (15,916)
  • +3,968 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,067), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate33.8%41.0%41.3%7.5% short
Shot accuracy16.2%14.2%12.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.770.950.950.18 short
Match win rate38.9%42.2%42.5%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkomeebroFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning34
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45523Last 10045%Win rateLWLTWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility5.4
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning3.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time614ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 5 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 5 May
422msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 25 Apr
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
136In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC28121643%-0.02
mirageA2112957%-0.03
nukeA148657%-0.02
dust2D134931%-0.06
anubisD93633%-0.06
ancientA85363%-0.01
infernoD61517%-0.04
boulder1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,226Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
5,258Matches
38.9%Match win rate
33.8%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 1 players
7,572MVPs
2,161Hours (in match)
4,862Bombs planted
1,029Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP14,890
AK-4713,979
SG 5533,413
SSG 082,535
P901,792
MP71,732

Lifetime map wins

6,377dust2
5,030inferno
2,866nuke
2,833train
525cbble
453vertigo
324lake
212office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
616msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
26.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.31HE damage / grenade
10.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0873% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4583% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.1017%19 Sept
cache13–100.0310%19 Sept
ancient6–130.0115%19 Sept
anubis15–15-0.029%18 Sept
dust213–1-0.0213%18 Sept
nuke10–13-0.017%18 Sept
cache10–130.0420%18 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0712%18 Sept
mirage5–13-0.060%17 Sept
dust20–13-0.1015%17 Sept
cache8–13-0.088%17 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0232%17 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0612%14 Sept
mirage13–11-0.078%14 Sept
nuke15–15-0.046%12 Sept
dust216–13-0.039%12 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0511%12 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0715%12 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0811%12 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0411%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0716%9 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0914%9 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0310%5 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0813%5 Sept
cache13–10-0.0215%5 Sept
mirage10–130.0022%5 Sept
mirage10–130.0117%1 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0421%1 Sept
boulder4–13-0.029%1 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0223%30 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0324%30 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0622%30 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0111%29 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0724%29 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0413%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0213%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0318%29 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0515%29 Aug
cache8–13-0.086%29 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0321%29 Aug
ancient13–110.0317%29 Aug
ancient13–30.027%28 Aug
anubis8–13-0.079%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.099%28 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0614%28 Aug
cache13–90.0614%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0613%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0124%23 Aug
mirage13–110.059%23 Aug
nuke13–6-0.048%23 Aug
cache13–5-0.098%23 Aug
inferno5–13-0.1010%21 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0719%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0410%21 Aug
nuke13–10-0.029%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0713%21 Aug
cache16–14-0.0120%21 Aug
nuke11–130.0621%24 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0323%24 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0510%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.0819%24 Jul
cache11–13-0.048%24 Jul
cache13–7-0.0216%24 Jul
inferno7–130.0312%5 Jul
cache7–13-0.0312%5 Jul
cache4–13-0.098%5 Jul
cache13–70.0721%5 Jul
nuke16–14-0.046%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0020%5 Jul
dust22–13-0.1210%5 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0113%14 May
nuke13–4-0.014%14 May
cache5–130.029%14 May
cache8–13-0.0718%14 May
cache3–13-0.0622%14 May
cache5–13-0.0511%7 May
cache9–13-0.0015%6 May
cache13–80.0023%5 May
cache13–11-0.0122%5 May
cache8–13-0.0936%5 May
cache13–110.0116%3 May
cache13–9-0.0027%3 May
cache11–130.0215%3 May
cache5–13-0.0810%3 May
cache13–4-0.0420%3 May
cache12–12-0.0119%3 May
anubis16–13-0.0816%25 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0510%25 Apr
inferno8–130.0219%25 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0115%25 Apr
dust22–13-0.128%25 Apr
mirage13–9-0.110%12 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0010%12 Apr
ancient13–80.029%12 Apr
dust213–70.0218%12 Apr
dust210–13-0.0620%11 Apr
ancient8–13-0.056%11 Apr
mirage4–13-0.1022%11 Apr
dust213–10-0.0624%11 Apr
inferno13–11-0.050%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →