xPingPlex

xPingPlex — CS2 Stats

76561198303236057[U:1:342970329]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,532Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,200Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,684Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,684 +6,590 17 Sept – 8 Oct · 22 days played
11,09419,899peak 19,89917 Sept8 Oct
19,899Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,215 below peak (19,899)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,316 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.8%45.7%46.8%5.0% short
Shot accuracy9.5%12.7%13.0%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.051.060.07 short
Match win rate45.3%45.7%46.3%1.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxPingPlexFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,684 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning63
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–40–2Last 10058%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility3.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.3
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time489ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 491ms → last ⅓ avg 489ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−5.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 17 Sept →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 28 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 91% over 11cacheWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2213–959%0.03
infernoA2011–955%0.03
mirageA138–562%-0.00
nukeB137–654%0.02
ancientA138–562%-0.00
anubisS1110–191%0.03
cacheD81–713%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

63,992Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,510Matches
45.3%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot %
9.5%Shot accuracy
6,996MVPs
1,506Hours (in match)
4,299Bombs planted
986Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

12,100dust2
5,600inferno
2,711nuke
508vertigo
333train
281cbble
162office
71assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

124Matches
55%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
80.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22959%1.2216.0
Mirage2846%1.0815.7
Inferno1963%1.4517.1
Ancient1560%1.0714.4
Anubis1362%1.5415.1
Nuke1040%1.1016.9
Cache560%1.1620.4
Overpass2100%1.2213.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
483msReaction time
59.6%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
5.91HE damage / grenade
6.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3421 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0216%26 Oct →
inferno13–100.0823%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0420%24 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0517%22 Oct →
dust213–40.0338%22 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0042%21 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.055%16 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.138%16 Oct →
nuke17–19-0.0117%15 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0036%15 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0723%9 Oct →
cache10–130.0719%8 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0633%7 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0318%7 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0410%7 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0412%7 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0217%7 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0311%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0427%5 Oct →
anubis13–90.0519%4 Oct →
dust216–140.0218%3 Oct →
anubis13–100.0314%3 Oct →
ancient16–120.0114%3 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0213%3 Oct →
anubis13–110.0116%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0523%3 Oct →
anubis13–10.0750%2 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0213%1 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0232%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.0121%29 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0411%29 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0213%28 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0280%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0229%28 Sept →
mirage2–130.0142%28 Sept →
inferno13–80.0524%28 Sept →
mirage12–160.0415%27 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0110%27 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0136%27 Sept →
inferno6–130.0027%27 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0820%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0317%26 Sept →
cache9–130.0226%26 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0323%26 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0136%25 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0525%25 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0130%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0427%25 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.017%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.069%24 Sept →
dust211–130.0318%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0125%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0419%23 Sept →
anubis13–40.0939%22 Sept →
dust213–20.0926%22 Sept →
dust215–150.0130%22 Sept →
cache13–50.1163%22 Sept →
mirage13–20.0623%22 Sept →
inferno13–100.0813%22 Sept →
inferno13–00.0942%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0123%22 Sept →
dust213–100.1237%22 Sept →
ancient13–80.0312%21 Sept →
dust213–100.0239%21 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0341%21 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0121%21 Sept →
dust25–130.0826%21 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0226%21 Sept →
nuke13–50.0426%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0014%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0231%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0033%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.0321%20 Sept →
nuke13–30.1624%20 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0130%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0036%20 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0738%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0445%20 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0614%20 Sept →
ancient8–130.0337%19 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0213%19 Sept →
nuke13–80.0555%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0324%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0028%18 Sept →
dust213–10.0952%18 Sept →
inferno13–90.1338%18 Sept →
inferno13–90.0227%18 Sept →
inferno13–20.2118%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0330%18 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0527%18 Sept →
dust29–130.1021%18 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0221%17 Sept →
dust213–20.1444%17 Sept →
dust213–60.0527%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0122%17 Sept →
nuke9–130.1216%17 Sept →
nuke13–110.0819%17 Sept →
ancient13–30.0516%17 Sept →
anubis13–50.2227%17 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0111%17 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.