game pls gaben — CS2 Stats
76561198301225298[U:1:340959570]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
No change since then — still 1,021 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 7 days played since 2 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- 567 below peak (32,436)
- Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
- Gold band first seen 2026-09-02
- Red band first seen 2026-09-02
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 5–0 · 100% win rate
- Avg rating 0.11
- Avg headshot accuracy 78%
- Avg reaction 475ms
Last 10
- 10–0 · 100% win rate
- Avg rating 0.14
- Avg headshot accuracy 79%
- Avg reaction 417ms
Last 20
- 20–0 · 100% win rate
- Avg rating 0.14
- Avg headshot accuracy 78%
- Avg reaction 398ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+3.1 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 59% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.
Where you differ: higher opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 100 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 75% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 75% on CT to 55% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | S | 29 | 29–0 | 100% | 0.14 |
 dust2 | S | 27 | 24–3 | 89% | 0.09 |
 inferno | S | 24 | 23–1 | 96% | 0.13 |
 nuke | S | 14 | 14–0 | 100% | 0.11 |
 cache | — | 4 | 4–0 | 100% | 0.12 |
 train | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.16 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (89% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced MechanicsPractice Config →
Sustained sprays are missing more than they land, which is a recoil-control pattern you can drill directly.
Spray accuracy 0% — below the 20% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.1116 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.13 | 68% | 21 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.12 | 83% | 21 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.11 | 76% | 21 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.05 | 68% | 21 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | 0.15 | 92% | 21 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.21 | 82% | 21 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.12 | 80% | 21 Sept → | |
| inferno | 5–1 | -0.02 | 83% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.21 | 77% | 20 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–0 | 0.35 | 80% | 20 Sept → | |
| train | 2–0 | 0.12 | 75% | 20 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.19 | 75% | 20 Sept → | |
| inferno | 5–1 | 0.02 | 100% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.15 | 74% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.24 | 78% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 4–0 | 0.20 | 75% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 2–0 | 0.02 | 17% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.07 | 93% | 20 Sept → | |
| nuke | 3–0 | 0.07 | 100% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.23 | 88% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.16 | 74% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.13 | 82% | 20 Sept → | |
| nuke | 3–0 | 0.03 | 100% | 20 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.09 | 100% | 20 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.05 | 89% | 20 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.02 | 75% | 20 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.14 | 67% | 19 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.14 | 92% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.13 | 82% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.16 | 94% | 19 Sept → | |
| train | 13–0 | 0.19 | 73% | 19 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.13 | 81% | 19 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | 0.10 | 72% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 8–1 | 0.12 | 73% | 19 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–2 | 0.06 | 44% | 19 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.01 | 80% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.17 | 82% | 19 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.15 | 63% | 19 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.15 | 81% | 19 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.10 | 75% | 19 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.09 | 85% | 19 Sept → | |
| inferno | 10–1 | 0.15 | 85% | 19 Sept → | |
| mirage | 3–0 | -0.04 | 0% | 18 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 10–5 | 0.10 | 77% | 18 Sept → | |
| mirage | 5–0 | 0.12 | 80% | 18 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 4–2 | 0.08 | 86% | 18 Sept → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | 0.09 | 74% | 18 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 2–13 | 0.01 | 65% | 18 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 2–0 | 0.00 | 0% | 18 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.02 | 83% | 18 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.27 | 74% | 17 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.01 | 77% | 17 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.12 | 59% | 17 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.14 | 54% | 17 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.30 | 83% | 17 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 6–0 | -0.05 | 44% | 16 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.03 | 86% | 16 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.10 | 77% | 16 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.21 | 88% | 16 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.31 | 66% | 16 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.02 | 87% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.34 | 82% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 3–0 | -0.04 | 100% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.05 | 83% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 12–12 | 0.19 | 91% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.01 | 77% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.15 | 75% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.21 | 80% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.02 | 75% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.15 | 91% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.09 | 46% | 15 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.09 | 46% | 15 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.17 | 83% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.25 | 71% | 15 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.11 | 59% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.15 | 82% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.12 | 84% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.06 | 86% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.02 | 69% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.06 | 50% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 3–0 | 0.00 | 100% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.03 | 67% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 4–0 | 0.16 | 71% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.17 | 75% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.20 | 65% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 6–0 | 0.12 | 69% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 6–3 | 0.05 | 86% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | -0.00 | 80% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.11 | 100% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 4–0 | 0.08 | 100% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.21 | 83% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.24 | 82% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.25 | 69% | 15 Sept → | |
| nuke | 11–1 | 0.12 | 85% | 15 Sept → | |
| nuke | 3–0 | 0.00 | 0% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.11 | 86% | 15 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | 0.16 | 75% | 15 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.24 | 81% | 15 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 6–0 | 0.13 | 75% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 5–1 | 0.20 | 80% | 15 Sept → |
Match data via Leetify.
