amood

amood — CS2 Stats

NO76561198299950290[U:1:339684562]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

719Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,373Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 719 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 18 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,515 +3,516 18 Jan – 22 May · 19 days played
14,99920,343peak 20,34318 Jan22 May
20,480Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-01-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,489), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate54.3%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy16.4%12.1%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.021.030.05 short
Match win rate44.1%44.7%45.2%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGamoodFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning47
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time588ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 10 Feb →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · vertigo, 13 Feb →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 3 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1810–856%-0.01
infernoA1810–856%0.00
nukeB178–947%-0.01
mirageA159–660%0.02
anubisS118–373%0.01
cacheA95–456%-0.00
dust2D62–433%0.01
overpassA53–260%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,984Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,096Matches
44.1%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
13,115MVPs
2,373Hours (in match)
1,230Bombs planted
1,966Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,528inferno
3,343dust2
2,441nuke
2,286vertigo
1,473train
568lake
362cbble
76office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches
58%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
74.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke650%0.9114.5
Ancient560%0.8612.0
Mirage367%0.8113.0
Inferno2100%1.1016.0
Anubis250%0.9115.0
Dust22100%1.4113.0
Cache1100%1.8832.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
590msReaction time
21.5%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
6.11HE damage / grenade
7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.4716% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0417%7 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0334%7 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0139%7 Sept →
inferno13–20.0329%7 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0118%5 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0133%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.059%5 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0226%5 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0511%5 Sept →
nuke13–60.0112%4 Sept →
mirage13–80.0322%4 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0616%31 Aug →
mirage13–20.1123%30 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0017%30 Aug →
inferno13–80.0424%29 Aug →
nuke8–130.0127%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.036%29 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0517%3 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0219%3 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0028%3 Aug →
ancient13–110.0412%3 Aug →
inferno9–50.047%30 May →
inferno6–90.0726%30 May →
cache5–13-0.0134%30 May →
ancient13–8-0.0615%22 May →
mirage13–80.0210%16 May →
anubis13–80.0728%16 May →
cache13–70.0618%3 May →
cache13–70.0328%3 May →
cache13–60.0515%3 May →
cache9–130.0332%29 Apr →
cache13–5-0.0517%29 Apr →
cache13–6-0.0043%29 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0423%2 Apr →
dust212–160.0425%2 Apr →
mirage13–40.0220%29 Mar →
anubis13–6-0.0122%29 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0313%29 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0518%29 Mar →
nuke0–3-0.050%29 Mar →
ancient13–80.018%23 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0615%23 Mar →
nuke13–9-0.0221%23 Mar →
nuke4–130.0115%20 Mar →
overpass1–13-0.0611%20 Mar →
inferno13–100.0112%20 Mar →
inferno13–60.0230%20 Mar →
mirage7–130.0213%20 Mar →
overpass13–60.0717%17 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0511%17 Mar →
ancient11–130.0119%17 Mar →
inferno13–50.0432%17 Mar →
anubis13–100.0719%16 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.017%16 Mar →
anubis13–100.0418%15 Mar →
inferno11–130.0031%15 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0717%15 Mar →
ancient13–110.0227%21 Feb →
dust211–130.0611%21 Feb →
mirage4–130.0621%21 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0818%16 Feb →
anubis13–60.0212%16 Feb →
overpass16–120.0431%13 Feb →
vertigo9–50.0355%13 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0538%13 Feb →
nuke13–110.0732%10 Feb →
mirage13–70.1433%10 Feb →
overpass10–13-0.0523%10 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0821%8 Feb →
dust216–140.0223%8 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0514%7 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0120%7 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0226%7 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0524%7 Feb →
mirage13–90.1025%4 Feb →
nuke11–130.0224%4 Feb →
inferno10–130.0316%4 Feb →
dust213–100.0320%2 Feb →
ancient11–130.0515%2 Feb →
inferno9–130.0125%2 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0214%1 Feb →
ancient13–60.0820%31 Jan →
anubis13–3-0.0310%31 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0514%31 Jan →
ancient2–130.0124%30 Jan →
anubis13–70.0236%30 Jan →
inferno13–110.0532%30 Jan →
ancient13–7-0.0324%30 Jan →
nuke13–7-0.0319%30 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0129%30 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0616%29 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.0229%29 Jan →
dust24–13-0.0229%29 Jan →
nuke13–110.0121%24 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0718%24 Jan →
mirage16–12-0.0014%24 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0129%24 Jan →
nuke3–13-0.0412%21 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0934%21 Jan →
overpass13–5-0.0327%18 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →