Kuschelbär

Kuschelbär — CS2 Stats

76561198299843818[U:1:339578090]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,298Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,586Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,586 -464 18 Aug15 Sept · 10 days played
17,58618,595peak 18,59518 Aug15 Sept
18,769Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-08-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,009 below peak (18,595)
  • -464 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,414 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKuschelbärPREMIER17,586 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning56
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD424612Last 10042%Win rateLTWWLLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 875 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility2.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.6
Utility2.2
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time519ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · fachwerk, 19 Aug
32%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 15 Sept
383msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · dust2, 20 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 40% over 40
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C40162440%-0.02
infernoB189950%-0.01
cacheC146843%-0.03
nukeS64267%0.01
vertigo41325%0.02
mirage3030%-0.03
ancient32167%-0.02
anubis21150%-0.03
train21150%-0.01
boulder2020%0.00
office2020%-0.01
shelter21150%0.01
overpass1010%-0.09
fachwerk110100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 40). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
527msReaction time
61.3%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
8.62HE damage / grenade
2.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3526 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.2916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 40 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust22–9-0.0217%20 Sept
cache12–120.0016%17 Sept
inferno13–80.0218%17 Sept
dust213–11-0.0223%17 Sept
dust29–13-0.0610%16 Sept
cache11–13-0.0411%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0327%16 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0821%16 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0510%15 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0213%15 Sept
dust211–13-0.0332%15 Sept
cache15–15-0.0018%15 Sept
inferno13–7-0.066%15 Sept
inferno6–10.0322%15 Sept
nuke12–120.0224%14 Sept
ancient10–5-0.0319%14 Sept
train13–7-0.034%14 Sept
inferno12–120.0113%14 Sept
dust213–9-0.0227%14 Sept
cache10–13-0.0318%13 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0113%13 Sept
dust21–13-0.0913%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.0414%13 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0412%13 Sept
boulder12–12-0.0120%13 Sept
cache13–2-0.0318%13 Sept
nuke13–60.0612%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0515%12 Sept
dust216–12-0.0211%12 Sept
nuke13–6-0.067%12 Sept
inferno6–130.0017%12 Sept
dust212–120.0212%12 Sept
cache13–6-0.013%12 Sept
dust213–7-0.040%12 Sept
dust213–60.0218%12 Sept
cache13–16-0.0320%11 Sept
office12–120.0119%10 Sept
cache7–13-0.0618%10 Sept
train5–130.0112%10 Sept
dust24–13-0.074%10 Sept
cache13–50.0015%9 Sept
dust213–10.0317%9 Sept
dust213–40.0715%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0219%9 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0720%8 Sept
dust23–13-0.0415%8 Sept
dust212–12-0.0524%8 Sept
dust28–13-0.0810%8 Sept
dust24–13-0.0716%8 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0114%5 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0522%4 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0811%1 Sept
nuke9–130.0023%1 Sept
dust210–130.0215%25 Aug
dust29–130.0817%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0229%25 Aug
shelter2–13-0.0712%24 Aug
dust27–13-0.059%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0220%24 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0211%24 Aug
dust213–60.0513%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.069%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.042%23 Aug
dust213–6-0.038%23 Aug
dust212–12-0.0310%23 Aug
dust213–90.0313%23 Aug
inferno5–130.0723%23 Aug
dust213–30.0718%23 Aug
vertigo11–130.0710%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0210%23 Aug
ancient13–20.038%23 Aug
cache6–13-0.0315%23 Aug
dust213–8-0.0323%23 Aug
dust28–130.0123%22 Aug
cache2–13-0.1427%21 Aug
dust212–12-0.0712%21 Aug
boulder5–130.0219%20 Aug
shelter13–10.0915%20 Aug
vertigo6–130.028%20 Aug
office3–13-0.0331%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0311%20 Aug
cache13–6-0.0414%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0319%20 Aug
dust213–50.0317%20 Aug
dust210–130.0013%20 Aug
dust213–60.0623%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0325%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0321%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0416%19 Aug
dust213–5-0.117%19 Aug
inferno13–40.0224%19 Aug
overpass5–13-0.099%19 Aug
vertigo13–40.0429%19 Aug
fachwerk13–20.1423%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.055%18 Aug
inferno11–130.0417%18 Aug
cache13–60.055%18 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0315%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0230%18 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0326%18 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →