SLT

SLT — CS2 Stats

PL76561198299798377[U:1:339532649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,748Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,537Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,520Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33206 of 221299 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,766 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,520 → 23,520
0Faceit ELO · 1,766 → 1,766
+1Tracked matches · now 1,748
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 1 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,520 +6,812 1 Jul15 Sept · 27 days played
16,53123,520peak 23,5201 Jul15 Sept
23,520Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,766Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,766
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 235 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,520
  • +3,000 over 30 days · improving
  • +6,812 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,480 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.6%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy15.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate44.1%46.3%46.9%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSLTFACEITLevel 8 · 1,766 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,520 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,766csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning55
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateWWLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time544ms−89ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 11 Aug
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 4 Aug
367msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · inferno, 2 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA41251661%0.03
cacheA159660%0.02
infernoD134931%0.03
anubisS118373%0.03
ancientS96367%0.04
dust2C52340%0.00
nuke41325%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.06
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

132,405Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,357Matches
44.1%Match win rate
49.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17,215MVPs
2,740Hours (in match)
8,360Bombs planted
1,857Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,210
AWP19,042
P2502,571
Knife2,380
MP92,261

Lifetime map wins

5,551train
5,394inferno
2,757dust2
2,081nuke
1,951vertigo
1,070cbble
106lake
54office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

938Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
72.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8961%1.1115.7
Anubis5347%0.9313.5
Ancient2259%1.0515.2
Dust21833%0.8212.5
Vertigo1471%0.9915.3
Inferno1242%1.1215.7
Train875%0.7812.1
Overpass786%0.8111.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
541msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
11.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.2483% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.1028%12 Sept
anubis13–110.0117%10 Sept
dust26–130.0329%9 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0029%9 Sept
inferno5–130.0428%8 Sept
cache13–4-0.0221%6 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0315%4 Sept
inferno11–130.0518%3 Sept
inferno9–00.1838%2 Sept
mirage13–40.0317%2 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0019%2 Sept
ancient16–140.0522%2 Sept
mirage16–140.0716%1 Sept
mirage13–110.0121%1 Sept
mirage0–8-0.089%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0840%25 Aug
mirage13–50.1033%16 Aug
mirage13–40.1023%16 Aug
anubis7–130.0326%16 Aug
mirage10–130.0219%16 Aug
inferno11–130.0816%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0419%15 Aug
ancient13–20.1918%11 Aug
anubis13–60.1133%11 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0117%9 Aug
cache13–10-0.0433%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0521%9 Aug
cache13–100.1015%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0224%9 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0222%9 Aug
inferno15–150.0422%7 Aug
mirage14–160.0227%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0623%6 Aug
inferno10–130.0230%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0222%5 Aug
cache13–40.1215%4 Aug
mirage2–130.0517%4 Aug
inferno13–70.0321%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0155%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0416%4 Aug
nuke13–70.0719%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0125%4 Aug
mirage13–90.1125%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0531%4 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0411%4 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0630%2 Aug
inferno13–60.0523%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0326%2 Aug
anubis4–130.0913%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0025%1 Aug
cache13–100.0320%1 Aug
mirage13–50.0918%31 Jul
ancient11–130.0222%30 Jul
ancient13–10.1130%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0816%29 Jul
mirage13–90.0228%29 Jul
ancient13–70.0732%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0419%26 Jul
anubis13–110.1219%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0621%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0224%26 Jul
cache13–160.0733%22 Jul
cache13–30.1121%22 Jul
cache16–140.0827%19 Jul
mirage6–130.0813%18 Jul
cache13–60.0515%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0134%18 Jul
mirage13–100.0723%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0435%16 Jul
nuke1–130.0126%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0019%16 Jul
mirage8–130.0428%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0616%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0714%15 Jul
nuke5–130.0123%13 Jul
cache13–3-0.0629%13 Jul
mirage14–160.0226%13 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0328%13 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0224%12 Jul
cache4–130.0031%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0020%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0725%12 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0223%12 Jul
mirage13–50.0422%12 Jul
cache5–13-0.0113%11 Jul
cache7–13-0.0328%11 Jul
inferno6–130.0020%9 Jul
dust213–7-0.0328%9 Jul
mirage8–130.0432%6 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0513%6 Jul
anubis6–00.0810%6 Jul
overpass13–80.0126%6 Jul
dust28–130.0627%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0726%4 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0214%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0021%4 Jul
mirage13–30.0021%4 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0025%2 Jul
ancient11–130.0316%2 Jul
anubis13–90.0511%1 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →