noAim - ReadMyProfile :)

noAim - ReadMyProfile :) — CS2 Stats

76561198297978005[U:1:337712277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

744Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,137Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,602Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61605 of 259059 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,602 -754 23 Jul – 15 Oct · 25 days played
21,10423,158peak 23,15823 Jul15 Oct
23,158Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-07-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,556 below peak (23,158)
  • -588 over 30 days · declining
  • -754 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,398 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.1%41.8%42.7%6.6% short
Shot accuracy18.6%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.040.980.99above
Match win rate33.1%43.3%43.9%10.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnoAim - ReadMyProfile :)FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER21,602 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning61
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +8.2pp headshot accuracy · −94ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.7

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.1
Utility7.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time603ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 20 Jul →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · cache, 29 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 4 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 21anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%0.00
infernoA2113–862%0.02
ancientC208–1240%0.01
cacheC188–1044%0.01
anubisD92–722%-0.00
nukeC73–443%-0.01
mirage—20–20%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,276Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
3,008Matches
33.1%Match win rate
36.1%Headshot %
18.6%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 3 players
5,134MVPs
1,137Hours (in match)
2,996Bombs planted
694Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,018
AWP9,399
MP91,934
P2501,657
FAMAS1,370

Lifetime map wins

9,148inferno
3,189nuke
1,508dust2
226vertigo
216train
105cbble
41lake
22dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
617msReaction time
48.1%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
12.0%Flash assists
11.01HE damage / grenade
13.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2128% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–160.0218%15 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0112%14 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0314%30 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0215%29 Sept →
cache6–00.0357%29 Sept →
inferno11–130.0313%26 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.016%26 Sept →
dust27–130.0019%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.028%24 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0016%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.017%24 Sept →
dust213–2-0.034%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.098%19 Sept →
inferno10–130.038%12 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0218%12 Sept →
cache13–16-0.048%12 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.017%7 Sept →
cache13–70.0416%7 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.018%7 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0512%7 Sept →
cache16–130.0312%5 Sept →
dust210–130.0016%5 Sept →
cache13–40.1115%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.0121%5 Sept →
nuke16–130.0012%5 Sept →
inferno13–50.0210%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0318%5 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0116%4 Sept →
anubis11–130.0622%4 Sept →
ancient13–20.0815%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0414%4 Sept →
ancient12–10.0923%4 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0817%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.1011%3 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0423%3 Sept →
cache13–100.0012%2 Sept →
cache13–20.0926%2 Sept →
inferno13–10.129%2 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0615%2 Sept →
cache13–30.1210%2 Sept →
inferno10–130.0320%2 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.029%2 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0426%2 Sept →
ancient15–150.1217%2 Sept →
inferno10–130.0215%2 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0217%28 Aug →
anubis13–40.0619%28 Aug →
dust210–130.0225%28 Aug →
anubis13–110.079%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0215%24 Aug →
ancient13–110.0614%24 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0011%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.039%23 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0029%23 Aug →
dust213–40.1217%23 Aug →
inferno13–60.0627%23 Aug →
cache7–130.0315%23 Aug →
inferno13–110.0413%21 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0815%21 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0622%21 Aug →
cache7–13-0.065%16 Aug →
dust213–90.0413%16 Aug →
dust26–13-0.018%16 Aug →
dust213–40.0133%15 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0511%15 Aug →
inferno16–140.0010%15 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0420%13 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0614%13 Aug →
inferno13–100.016%6 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0314%6 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0110%25 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0518%25 Jul →
dust216–140.1026%25 Jul →
dust213–100.0611%25 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.029%25 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0223%25 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0812%25 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0016%24 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0117%23 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0120%23 Jul →
ancient13–30.0620%23 Jul →
ancient13–40.0316%23 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0129%23 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0019%22 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0614%22 Jul →
ancient7–130.0311%21 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.1014%21 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0522%21 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0222%21 Jul →
dust29–130.0816%20 Jul →
nuke13–90.0229%20 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0019%20 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0112%20 Jul →
cache0–13-0.0117%20 Jul →
inferno13–70.1421%20 Jul →
nuke8–130.0133%20 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0528%20 Jul →
dust213–90.0318%19 Jul →
ancient13–70.0119%15 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0517%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.