Plohx☂

Plohx☂ — CS2 Stats

76561198297889242[U:1:337623514]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,077Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,498 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,498 → 2,498
+7Tracked matches · now 2,077
−10.4ppWin rate · 65.5% → 55.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 4 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,513 -3,041 20 Feb27 Jun · 2 days played
19,51322,554peak 22,55420 Feb27 Jun
22,554Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,498Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2025-08-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,498
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 2 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlohx☂FACEITLevel 10 · 2,498 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,498csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning64
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61381Last 10061%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −7.7pp headshot accuracy · −148ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility2.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels6.4
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.4
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time603ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 20 Feb
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · ancient, 27 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 3 Jan
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 20 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 79% over 14anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA29171259%0.01
infernoA26151158%0.02
dust2S1411379%0.02
mirageB105550%0.01
overpassS75271%0.00
trainS75271%0.01
anubisC52340%0.03
cache21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,422Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient17051%0.9715.2
Dust214046%1.0215.5
Inferno11051%1.0816.4
Mirage10146%0.9815.6
Anubis8352%1.0115.9
Overpass4867%1.0215.2
Train4470%1.0214.3
Nuke1258%0.9316.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
607msReaction time
53.9%T opening success
59.0%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
5.25HE damage / grenade
2.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3337 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–16-0.045%20 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0214%19 Sept
cache13–90.0719%18 Sept
inferno13–100.0613%18 Sept
inferno13–160.0417%16 Sept
inferno7–130.0510%16 Sept
ancient13–100.0422%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0717%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0318%12 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0326%12 Aug
cache7–13-0.1017%17 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0438%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0316%27 Jun
dust216–140.0220%20 Feb
ancient13–10.0720%20 Feb
dust213–110.0626%20 Feb
dust213–50.0729%20 Feb
inferno13–40.0725%20 Feb
ancient13–30.1233%20 Feb
anubis13–110.0514%17 Feb
inferno13–100.0025%17 Feb
anubis13–80.1022%17 Feb
ancient15–150.0115%15 Feb
ancient8–130.0122%15 Feb
ancient13–50.1115%15 Feb
anubis12–160.0721%24 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0617%21 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0418%14 Jan
inferno20–220.0117%6 Jan
ancient10–130.0025%4 Jan
ancient13–4-0.0510%3 Jan
inferno12–16-0.018%3 Jan
ancient13–50.0916%3 Jan
mirage13–60.0120%3 Jan
dust213–90.0729%3 Jan
mirage13–60.1119%2 Jan
inferno13–70.0629%2 Jan
inferno13–110.0421%2 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0213%2 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0015%2 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0426%2 Jan
mirage11–130.0020%1 Jan
dust213–9-0.0017%1 Jan
mirage4–130.0010%27 Dec
inferno16–120.0022%26 Dec
mirage9–130.0624%26 Dec
overpass13–10-0.0131%19 Dec
ancient13–3-0.0023%17 Dec
mirage19–16-0.0020%9 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0515%9 Dec
inferno14–160.0326%1 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0016%29 Nov
inferno11–130.0211%22 Nov
train7–13-0.0411%18 Nov
ancient13–80.0213%18 Nov
overpass13–100.0012%18 Nov
inferno13–50.1020%15 Nov
ancient14–16-0.059%11 Nov
dust213–11-0.0422%6 Nov
overpass13–40.0911%5 Nov
inferno8–130.0217%27 Oct
inferno13–100.0215%21 Oct
ancient13–110.0416%18 Oct
train13–50.0612%14 Oct
ancient13–10-0.0416%24 Sept
ancient13–90.0116%11 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0014%9 Sept
inferno15–19-0.0516%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0221%8 Sept
overpass13–80.0213%4 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0515%29 Aug
dust213–9-0.0018%28 Aug
train19–160.0023%27 Aug
dust28–130.0420%26 Aug
train13–110.0120%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0413%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0013%21 Aug
ancient13–60.0614%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0114%20 Aug
inferno13–90.0215%19 Aug
train11–13-0.0126%18 Aug
dust213–20.0019%17 Aug
ancient5–13-0.1114%17 Aug
train13–90.0115%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0927%17 Aug
overpass4–130.0222%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0132%16 Aug
inferno13–110.0815%16 Aug
dust216–140.0421%16 Aug
ancient13–90.1119%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0315%13 Aug
overpass7–13-0.0713%13 Aug
dust213–20.0217%12 Aug
train13–90.0215%12 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0625%12 Aug
ancient13–60.019%11 Aug
overpass13–10-0.037%11 Aug
ancient13–10.0310%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0718%7 Aug
ancient4–13-0.079%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →