kaiS

kaiS — CS2 Stats

TD76561198211551005[U:1:251285277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,464Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,652 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 68 days played since 14 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,615 -1,582 15 Apr27 Jun · 13 days played
13,61517,010peak 17,01015 Apr27 Jun
17,207Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,652Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
68Days played since 2026-04-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,652
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkaiSFACEITLevel 8 · 1,652 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,652csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning44
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41536Last 10041%Win rateLLWWLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · −106ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.4
Utility7.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time616ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · office, 14 May
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · shelter, 8 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · office, 14 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 6anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC41172441%-0.01
mirageB115645%0.01
anubisD71614%0.00
officeD72529%0.02
cacheB63350%-0.03
trainB63350%0.00
nukeC52340%-0.07
ancient43175%0.02
dust242250%-0.03
overpass32167%-0.07
vertigo2020%-0.11
poseidon21150%0.03
shelter1010%-0.06
alpine1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

956Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
84.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8655%1.0915.6
Inferno6557%1.1316.2
Dust25838%0.9916.5
Ancient3754%1.2715.3
Nuke1844%1.1214.9
Anubis967%1.3019.8
Overpass825%1.0116.9
Train667%1.0917.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
596msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
61.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
11.07HE damage / grenade
23.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.883% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–16-0.0211%20 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0517%19 Sept
cache13–9-0.0327%18 Sept
inferno13–100.0328%18 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0118%16 Sept
inferno7–13-0.088%16 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0525%16 Sept
ancient13–100.0417%11 Sept
inferno7–90.0826%7 Sept
office7–13-0.0711%6 Sept
office6–130.0422%6 Sept
office7–130.0315%4 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0126%3 Sept
inferno9–70.0728%1 Sept
inferno1–13-0.0533%1 Sept
inferno11–130.0327%31 Aug
inferno13–80.0316%28 Aug
inferno9–00.0450%26 Aug
inferno9–10.046%26 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0115%26 Aug
train6–13-0.0415%15 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0921%8 Aug
inferno13–110.0016%6 Aug
inferno0–6-0.0433%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0323%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.039%25 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0418%24 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0411%15 Jul
office13–6-0.0219%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0314%13 Jul
office6–13-0.0225%13 Jul
shelter2–13-0.06100%8 Jul
inferno13–80.0014%6 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0913%5 Jul
inferno9–130.0620%2 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0422%1 Jul
inferno8–20.1213%1 Jul
ancient13–30.0726%27 Jun
mirage6–130.0122%27 Jun
inferno8–4-0.0324%25 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0427%24 Jun
train13–100.0733%22 Jun
vertigo4–9-0.0710%19 Jun
train8–13-0.0421%19 Jun
train11–13-0.0528%17 Jun
inferno12–120.0315%16 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0229%14 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0011%12 Jun
nuke5–9-0.149%12 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0621%9 Jun
vertigo0–8-0.150%3 Jun
dust26–13-0.0535%30 May
anubis6–13-0.0318%28 May
anubis7–13-0.0419%27 May
nuke13–5-0.0213%25 May
anubis8–130.1015%23 May
poseidon8–8-0.0128%23 May
inferno9–7-0.0624%20 May
dust21–8-0.170%19 May
mirage6–13-0.0515%19 May
inferno9–60.0325%19 May
nuke2–9-0.1811%18 May
mirage8–13-0.0119%18 May
anubis13–40.0221%17 May
mirage16–140.029%17 May
overpass13–10-0.0118%16 May
dust213–90.0219%16 May
overpass0–9-0.2333%16 May
inferno6–13-0.0519%15 May
office6–13-0.0125%14 May
office13–00.2120%14 May
mirage13–60.0915%12 May
inferno9–13-0.0511%11 May
cache13–80.0920%10 May
dust216–140.0823%7 May
inferno12–120.0513%6 May
poseidon9–70.0613%6 May
cache2–9-0.050%6 May
inferno3–130.0326%5 May
mirage8–130.0425%5 May
nuke6–13-0.0418%4 May
cache2–10-0.138%1 May
cache3–130.0010%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0822%29 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0544%27 Apr
alpine7–13-0.0521%27 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0213%24 Apr
mirage13–50.0330%24 Apr
inferno6–90.0022%23 Apr
overpass13–100.0414%22 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0124%22 Apr
ancient13–90.0018%22 Apr
train13–70.0126%22 Apr
train13–70.0616%22 Apr
inferno3–10-0.0925%21 Apr
nuke13–110.0117%16 Apr
mirage13–20.0621%16 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0917%15 Apr
anubis2–130.0123%14 Apr
inferno13–60.0727%14 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →