Crash Dummy 101 — CS2 Stats

76561198297512426[U:1:337246698]✓ No bans

2,573Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,018Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8816 of 39355 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,632 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrash Dummy 101FACEITLevel 8 · 1,632 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,018 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning50
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50464Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression5.4
Utility5.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch6.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time541ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC25101540%-0.01
dust2C1661038%0.01
cacheA159660%0.01
ancientA148657%0.02
nukeB126650%-0.00
mirageA95456%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.02
overpass440100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

486Matches
53%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
81.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22854%1.1215.4
Inferno2171%1.2213.4
Ancient2060%1.0816.4
Overpass1443%1.0917.5
Mirage1450%0.8813.7
Nuke1250%0.8113.3
Anubis540%0.9215.6
Cache2100%1.3817.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
549msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
13.37HE damage / grenade
4.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3431% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0513%26 Aug
cache13–60.0128%26 Aug
inferno12–8-0.0217%26 Aug
cache8–13-0.0121%23 Aug
inferno9–130.0118%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0218%20 Aug
dust213–110.0622%20 Aug
ancient13–00.0714%19 Aug
nuke13–50.0218%19 Aug
anubis13–90.0228%19 Aug
ancient13–80.0326%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0233%18 Aug
cache6–13-0.0132%17 Aug
nuke9–130.0314%16 Aug
dust211–130.0328%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0023%15 Aug
nuke13–50.0721%15 Aug
cache13–50.0510%15 Aug
dust27–130.0529%15 Aug
inferno13–40.0021%15 Aug
ancient7–130.0217%15 Aug
dust213–40.1329%15 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0318%30 Jul
ancient9–130.0323%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0415%30 Jul
mirage3–7-0.039%26 Jul
cache13–70.0318%26 Jul
cache9–13-0.0115%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0319%26 Jul
cache13–6-0.0019%26 Jul
cache13–70.0332%26 Jul
inferno8–80.0319%23 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1118%23 Jul
cache13–9-0.0015%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0125%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0614%22 Jul
cache16–14-0.0316%21 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0111%20 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0112%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0711%20 Jul
cache13–70.0421%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0215%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0125%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0327%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0523%19 Jul
inferno13–30.0716%19 Jul
dust23–13-0.0967%19 Jul
dust29–13-0.0211%15 Jul
nuke15–15-0.029%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0222%15 Jul
mirage13–2-0.054%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0127%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0321%14 Jul
cache4–13-0.0034%14 Jul
dust213–70.1025%14 Jul
dust22–13-0.0516%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0231%13 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0128%13 Jul
ancient13–100.0622%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0422%13 Jul
inferno7–130.0416%13 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0318%9 Jul
dust26–130.0214%9 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0217%9 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0922%9 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0040%9 Jul
dust213–110.0021%9 Jul
inferno13–60.0318%9 Jul
cache13–100.0826%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.038%3 Jul
ancient13–30.0939%3 Jul
inferno13–90.0824%3 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0518%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.0919%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0531%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0320%2 Jul
mirage13–90.0323%2 Jul
dust210–130.0147%2 Jul
nuke13–70.029%2 Jul
inferno11–130.0129%1 Jul
ancient16–140.0523%1 Jul
overpass13–50.0122%1 Jul
ancient13–100.0220%30 Jun
anubis10–13-0.055%30 Jun
mirage13–10-0.039%30 Jun
overpass13–70.0524%30 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0213%30 Jun
ancient6–130.0320%30 Jun
anubis13–40.0010%30 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0420%23 Jun
cache11–13-0.0119%23 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0217%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0520%23 Jun
nuke2–13-0.1025%23 Jun
dust213–40.0924%23 Jun
inferno15–150.0118%22 Jun
overpass13–100.0216%22 Jun
overpass9–30.1119%22 Jun
cache12–120.026%22 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0111%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →