nero ツ

nero ツ — CS2 Stats

76561197977824398[U:1:17558670]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,752Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,432Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64161 of 259041 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,107 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,432 -706 20 Aug – 30 Oct · 29 days played
19,15122,138peak 22,13820 Aug30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,107 +0 2 Sept – 11 Sept · 3 observations
2,1072,107peak 2,1072 Sept11 Sept
22,525Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,107Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,107
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 393 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 706 below peak (22,138)
  • +1,185 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,568 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnero ツFACEITLevel 10 · 2,107 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,432 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,107csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning60
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.4
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.0
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time576ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 20 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · dust2, 3 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · ancient, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 8% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2414–1058%0.03
dust2B199–1047%-0.01
mirageB147–750%0.01
infernoC146–843%0.03
anubisD131–128%0.02
ancientC104–640%-0.01
nukeS64–267%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,270Matches
51%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
82.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211145%0.9716.0
Inferno9653%1.0116.8
Mirage9547%1.0816.1
Nuke6341%1.0517.1
Ancient4753%1.3416.8
Anubis3348%0.9816.4
Train2255%1.2317.9
Cache1681%1.2915.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
582msReaction time
66.4%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
14.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0216%30 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0217%30 Oct →
dust23–130.0321%30 Oct →
mirage10–130.039%30 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0029%30 Oct →
cache13–80.0721%28 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0022%28 Oct →
nuke13–60.0413%27 Oct →
mirage13–100.0516%27 Oct →
cache11–13-0.007%27 Oct →
mirage6–130.0519%27 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0115%27 Oct →
cache10–130.0410%27 Oct →
inferno13–100.0118%26 Oct →
inferno13–50.1227%26 Oct →
mirage13–80.029%26 Oct →
anubis11–130.0122%26 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0117%22 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0224%22 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0118%22 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0217%22 Oct →
nuke16–120.0313%22 Oct →
inferno10–130.0429%21 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0114%20 Oct →
anubis10–130.0314%20 Oct →
dust29–130.0122%20 Oct →
anubis10–130.0014%20 Oct →
cache13–60.0030%11 Oct →
cache3–130.0514%9 Oct →
mirage16–140.0421%9 Oct →
inferno8–130.0421%9 Oct →
cache13–100.0314%9 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0217%8 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0427%8 Oct →
inferno13–90.0714%6 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0123%5 Oct →
dust213–50.0418%5 Oct →
cache13–110.0516%5 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0112%5 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0115%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0422%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0917%3 Oct →
dust213–90.0230%3 Oct →
dust215–150.0132%3 Oct →
ancient8–130.0216%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.0226%3 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0716%3 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.020%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0018%2 Oct →
cache6–130.0324%2 Oct →
cache13–110.0328%2 Oct →
cache13–90.0125%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0319%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0419%23 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0513%22 Sept →
ancient8–130.0016%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.0419%20 Sept →
cache13–30.0416%20 Sept →
cache5–130.0115%20 Sept →
cache13–70.1820%20 Sept →
anubis9–130.0327%16 Sept →
cache11–130.0220%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0219%16 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0021%16 Sept →
inferno13–80.0419%14 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0329%14 Sept →
nuke6–130.0018%14 Sept →
ancient4–9-0.107%7 Sept →
mirage4–130.0319%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0825%7 Sept →
inferno13–70.1024%7 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0120%4 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0324%3 Sept →
anubis13–40.1117%3 Sept →
ancient13–40.0613%3 Sept →
cache15–150.0419%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0018%2 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0416%30 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0116%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0017%30 Aug →
anubis10–130.0017%30 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0421%28 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0321%28 Aug →
dust215–150.0722%28 Aug →
inferno8–130.0030%28 Aug →
cache13–10.1011%28 Aug →
anubis9–130.0227%26 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0021%24 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0122%24 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0016%24 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0317%24 Aug →
cache8–130.0019%23 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0323%23 Aug →
inferno11–130.0122%23 Aug →
cache9–130.0819%23 Aug →
ancient13–90.0328%23 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0221%23 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0513%23 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0115%20 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0624%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.