Tagilla

Tagilla — CS2 Stats

US76561198295207382[U:1:334941654]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

513Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,583Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#23954 of 251275 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 513
−3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,825 +1,540 19 Jun – 18 Sept · 27 days played
21,92626,094peak 26,09419 Jun18 Sept
26,353Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-06-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.23——
Headshot %67%——

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.1%42.7%43.7%6.6% short
Shot accuracy18.0%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.190.991.02above
Match win rate49.0%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTagillaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning46
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +9.5pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility7.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.6
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time661ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 21 Jun →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 3 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 25 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 1 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 27anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2715–1256%-0.00
dust2A2716–1159%-0.01
mirageC2310–1343%-0.01
nukeB84–450%-0.00
ancientC73–443%-0.00
anubisD62–433%0.00
overpass—20–20%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,522Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3,602Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
37.1%Headshot %
18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
13,251MVPs
1,583Hours (in match)
3,947Bombs planted
1,158Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,573
AWP14,668
SG 5532,664
P2502,084
MP91,883
P901,640

Lifetime map wins

9,258dust2
4,968inferno
1,236nuke
1,148train
753cbble
493lake
362vertigo
50safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

862Matches
50%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
—ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
649msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.04HE damage / grenade
13.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.619° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0814%21 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0346%3 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0323%3 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0222%3 Aug →
dust24–130.0341%29 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0530%26 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0013%26 Jul →
mirage13–110.0423%26 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0423%26 Jul →
dust21–10-0.0444%26 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0117%25 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0426%25 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0222%25 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0310%25 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0017%25 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.0521%25 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.046%23 Jul →
anubis2–130.0514%23 Jul →
dust213–60.0324%23 Jul →
dust213–90.0528%22 Jul →
mirage16–130.0125%22 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0144%22 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0325%21 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0125%21 Jul →
mirage13–60.0518%20 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0229%20 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0035%20 Jul →
anubis13–110.0221%20 Jul →
inferno16–120.0024%20 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.1038%20 Jul →
nuke13–50.0812%19 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0119%19 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0331%19 Jul →
inferno16–140.0425%14 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0021%14 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0219%13 Jul →
ancient13–60.0417%13 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0116%13 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0118%13 Jul →
dust210–13-0.015%13 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0416%13 Jul →
inferno13–90.0314%13 Jul →
dust213–110.004%13 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0732%13 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0013%9 Jul →
mirage16–120.0220%9 Jul →
dust213–60.0530%9 Jul →
overpass5–130.0812%6 Jul →
dust213–110.0326%5 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0617%5 Jul →
dust27–13-0.1011%5 Jul →
dust213–30.0029%5 Jul →
inferno13–90.0328%5 Jul →
inferno13–50.0015%4 Jul →
inferno13–40.0331%4 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0316%4 Jul →
dust213–40.0115%4 Jul →
mirage15–150.0525%4 Jul →
dust211–130.0019%2 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0622%1 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0617%1 Jul →
inferno13–60.0220%1 Jul →
mirage13–20.0624%1 Jul →
anubis14–160.0222%30 Jun →
dust213–80.0519%30 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0224%30 Jun →
inferno13–20.0218%30 Jun →
mirage13–40.0530%29 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0623%29 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0222%28 Jun →
dust213–30.0116%28 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0114%27 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0120%27 Jun →
dust210–130.0221%27 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.019%27 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0423%27 Jun →
inferno13–70.0924%26 Jun →
ancient13–80.0322%26 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0013%26 Jun →
inferno3–130.0230%26 Jun →
anubis13–40.0723%26 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0314%25 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0210%24 Jun →
nuke10–130.0113%22 Jun →
mirage6–130.0121%22 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0914%22 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.089%22 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0326%22 Jun →
nuke13–60.0715%22 Jun →
mirage13–100.1037%21 Jun →
nuke15–15-0.0319%21 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0217%21 Jun →
mirage8–130.0131%21 Jun →
inferno4–130.0128%21 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0716%20 Jun →
inferno13–100.0236%20 Jun →
dust213–70.0120%20 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0224%19 Jun →
nuke15–150.0026%19 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0227%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.