Marcos

Marcos — CS2 Stats

DO76561198290038249[U:1:329772521]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,359Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,721Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,827Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89027 of 225285 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,160 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,359 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,827 -287 20 Feb17 Sept · 13 days played
18,82722,024peak 22,02420 Feb17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,160 +0 16 Sept17 Sept · 2 observations
1,1601,160peak 1,16016 Sept17 Sept
22,024Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,160Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,160
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 41 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,197 below peak (22,024)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,173 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.8%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy5.4%12.0%12.4%7.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.791.021.040.25 short
Match win rate37.5%44.7%45.2%7.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarcosFACEITLevel 5 · 1,160 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,827 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,160csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning55
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54406Last 10054%Win rateLWLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.5
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time568ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 28 Jul
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mst_pistolmap_ver2.0, 8 Feb
438msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 2 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 9 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 20nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25141156%-0.00
dust2S2013765%0.01
infernoC1771041%0.01
anubisA116555%0.01
ancientB105550%-0.00
nukeD51420%-0.05
cache220100%0.02
overpass2020%-0.05
mst_pistolmap_ver2.0220100%0.04
vertigo21150%0.02
train110100%0.04
warden110100%-0.02
dust2_n1010%-0.04
stronghold110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,327Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
3,073Matches
37.5%Match win rate
48.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
5.4%Shot accuracy
6,467MVPs
1,276Hours (in match)
3,020Bombs planted
527Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,880
AWP2,779
MP91,491
SG 5531,152
MP71,124
AUG1,055

Lifetime map wins

4,526dust2
2,859inferno
2,594nuke
1,294vertigo
187train
140lake
38office
25italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

147Matches
50%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
67.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5349%0.7912.5
Dust23358%0.8313.3
Anubis2152%0.8914.3
Ancient1735%0.9014.3
Nuke1164%0.7912.1
Inferno757%1.0315.6
Vertigo520%0.7712.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
575msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
9.40HE damage / grenade
4.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9088% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0118%11 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0130%11 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0414%11 Sept
inferno10–13-0.028%11 Sept
anubis7–13-0.079%9 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0320%9 Sept
dust213–110.0223%9 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0821%9 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0016%8 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0642%8 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0114%7 Sept
inferno15–15-0.049%7 Sept
anubis13–80.0538%6 Sept
inferno13–20.0721%6 Sept
ancient8–13-0.036%6 Sept
dust213–16-0.0314%6 Sept
mirage16–130.0427%6 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0413%16 Aug
dust210–130.0223%16 Aug
dust216–140.0317%9 Aug
anubis13–1-0.0114%9 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0516%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0210%9 Aug
anubis13–50.0315%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.029%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0515%8 Aug
inferno7–130.0224%5 Aug
dust211–130.0227%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0313%3 Aug
inferno13–80.0524%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0312%3 Aug
cache13–70.0322%2 Aug
ancient13–40.0227%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0217%2 Aug
dust26–8-0.029%1 Aug
mirage9–130.0323%31 Jul
train13–30.0415%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0015%31 Jul
dust213–10.1036%31 Jul
dust213–90.1322%28 Jul
inferno9–6-0.0826%17 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0419%16 Jul
cache7–10.018%22 Jun
dust213–100.0417%28 Mar
warden13–7-0.0224%23 Mar
dust213–10-0.0224%23 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0330%3 Mar
mirage13–80.0411%1 Mar
inferno13–100.0314%1 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0621%1 Mar
dust213–70.0418%1 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0519%28 Feb
dust213–7-0.0216%28 Feb
dust213–5-0.0318%28 Feb
ancient13–110.0120%26 Feb
ancient3–130.0212%26 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0416%25 Feb
ancient13–100.0613%23 Feb
mirage13–90.0721%23 Feb
mirage16–120.0318%21 Feb
anubis16–130.0320%21 Feb
mirage13–110.0216%21 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0138%21 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0614%20 Feb
dust213–10-0.0019%20 Feb
dust216–12-0.0118%20 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0110%19 Feb
nuke8–13-0.1014%19 Feb
inferno8–80.0234%18 Feb
inferno9–70.0224%18 Feb
dust27–13-0.039%18 Feb
inferno13–60.0420%18 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0820%15 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0216%14 Feb
anubis11–130.0419%14 Feb
mirage13–90.0614%14 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0218%14 Feb
inferno16–19-0.0223%11 Feb
mirage13–110.0120%9 Feb
mst_pistolmap_ver2.013–80.1054%8 Feb
dust2_n8–12-0.0428%7 Feb
mirage10–130.0616%5 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0615%5 Feb
mst_pistolmap_ver2.013–10-0.0127%4 Feb
mirage9–130.0011%2 Feb
vertigo8–80.0014%2 Feb
inferno8–80.0928%2 Feb
vertigo9–20.0310%2 Feb
inferno9–130.0122%1 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0123%1 Feb
nuke3–9-0.0525%1 Feb
inferno9–50.0739%1 Feb
anubis13–80.0921%31 Jan
dust215–15-0.0119%31 Jan
anubis12–160.0022%31 Jan
stronghold13–70.0318%31 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0227%30 Jan
mirage13–110.0518%30 Jan
dust219–150.0618%29 Jan
anubis13–60.025%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →