Chick

Chick — CS2 Stats

CK76561198288900006[U:1:328634278]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

705Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,940Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#37983 of 254928 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,529 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,423 +4,144 25 Jun – 27 Sept · 14 days played
18,83624,882peak 24,88225 Jun27 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,529Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-06-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,529
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 2 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches79——
Win rate46%——
K/D1.16——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 15 Sep 2026 → 19 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.0%46.8%48.2%9.2% short
Shot accuracy14.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.151.061.07above
Match win rate45.0%46.3%46.9%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChickFACEITLevel 8 · 1,529 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,529csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning58
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.2

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time520ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 16 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 17 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 20ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%0.02
dust2S2015–575%0.02
infernoA1912–763%0.04
anubisC104–640%-0.00
cacheS96–367%0.03
nukeB63–350%0.00
ancientD51–420%-0.02
vertigo—30–30%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,457Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,439Matches
45.0%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10,329MVPs
1,127Hours (in match)
1,424Bombs planted
603Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,965
AWP10,605
MAC-103,435
MP92,761
Knife1,195
P2501,149

Lifetime map wins

8,355inferno
2,194dust2
957nuke
647train
459cbble
247vertigo
145office
74lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

161Matches
57%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
90.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4852%1.2216.6
Dust23757%1.1518.4
Inferno2475%1.3620.0
Nuke1662%1.3517.9
Ancient1136%1.2718.0
Anubis838%0.9213.4
Overpass3100%1.4817.3
Cache3100%1.2719.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
504msReaction time
68.8%T opening success
33.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
7.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.6269% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0718%19 Oct →
cache6–130.0117%19 Oct →
inferno16–140.0116%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0318%5 Oct →
inferno13–70.0214%5 Oct →
dust213–110.0216%5 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0321%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0017%5 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0410%5 Oct →
mirage13–30.0410%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.012%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.036%30 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0222%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0211%28 Sept →
anubis13–10.0011%28 Sept →
cache13–8-0.1118%28 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.072%27 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.0123%27 Sept →
mirage0–4-0.010%27 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0610%27 Sept →
dust219–170.0631%27 Sept →
mirage13–70.0618%26 Sept →
mirage10–130.0212%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.0817%26 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0626%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.1015%26 Sept →
dust213–160.0314%26 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0613%25 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0114%19 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0311%18 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0916%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0217%18 Sept →
cache13–90.0721%18 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0410%18 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0812%18 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0221%18 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.037%18 Sept →
inferno9–60.1940%17 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0615%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0414%17 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0420%17 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0312%17 Sept →
anubis9–130.0129%16 Sept →
cache13–90.0833%13 Sept →
dust213–60.0026%10 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.078%10 Sept →
inferno13–60.0127%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0526%6 Sept →
mirage8–130.0020%6 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0118%1 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0019%28 Aug →
dust211–130.1617%28 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0415%28 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0116%27 Aug →
cache13–90.0424%27 Aug →
dust216–140.0012%26 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0012%25 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0919%20 Aug →
anubis5–130.0320%20 Aug →
mirage13–90.0526%19 Aug →
inferno13–110.0313%19 Aug →
dust215–150.0121%19 Aug →
inferno13–80.0520%19 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0218%19 Aug →
mirage10–130.0420%19 Aug →
mirage13–90.0414%18 Aug →
ancient13–110.0723%18 Aug →
inferno13–50.0517%18 Aug →
inferno13–90.1220%18 Aug →
mirage13–100.0815%17 Aug →
mirage13–60.0818%17 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0620%17 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0621%17 Aug →
anubis13–90.0621%17 Aug →
dust213–30.1119%16 Aug →
anubis13–100.0820%16 Aug →
cache13–80.2024%16 Aug →
inferno8–130.0530%15 Aug →
mirage13–90.0419%15 Aug →
inferno8–130.0221%10 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0330%10 Aug →
inferno13–20.1623%8 Aug →
cache13–90.0720%1 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0016%27 Jun →
nuke13–110.0617%27 Jun →
dust216–140.0021%27 Jun →
mirage15–150.0614%27 Jun →
inferno13–70.0215%27 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0027%26 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0211%26 Jun →
dust213–90.0413%26 Jun →
mirage13–50.0717%26 Jun →
inferno9–130.1029%26 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0323%26 Jun →
inferno3–130.0419%26 Jun →
inferno13–30.0320%25 Jun →
mirage7–130.0114%25 Jun →
mirage13–50.106%25 Jun →
mirage8–130.0119%25 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0110%25 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.