J1pe

J1pe — CS2 Stats

TD76561198276297100[U:1:316031372]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,223Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,669Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,332Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82134 of 220001 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,223 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 67 days played since 4 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,332 +2,000 26 Nov15 Sept · 30 days played
16,86020,586peak 20,58626 Nov15 Sept
20,699Peak Premier in tracked matches
67Days played since 2025-06-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,254 below peak (20,586)
  • +353 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 668 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate42.8%46.8%48.3%5.5% short
Shot accuracy17.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.07meets
Match win rate45.7%46.3%46.9%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJ1peFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,332 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning38
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41536Last 10041%Win rateWLLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · −123ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.9
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning3.8
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time622ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 30 Aug
55%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 13 Feb
391msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · cache, 29 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 7 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 54% over 24infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.00
dust2C156940%-0.02
ancientB115645%-0.03
infernoD113827%-0.01
nukeD93633%-0.02
trainB84450%-0.02
anubisC73443%0.00
cacheB63350%0.01
vertigo21150%0.05
office1010%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.03
italy1010%-0.04
golden1010%0.03
palacio1010%-0.10
brewery1010%0.07
jura1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,927Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
4,275Matches
45.7%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
13,115MVPs
1,603Hours (in match)
2,694Bombs planted
2,348Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,744
AWP14,672
FAMAS1,587
MP91,181
SSG 081,174

Lifetime map wins

9,446inferno
4,679dust2
4,251vertigo
4,012nuke
2,988train
820cbble
129office
90lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

854Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2832%1.0617.4
Mirage2544%1.0515.4
Anubis2055%1.2217.3
Inferno1759%1.3517.9
Dust21753%1.0315.5
Nuke862%1.2615.6
Vertigo560%0.8014.0
Train475%1.0015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
620msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.78HE damage / grenade
9.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.1724% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0120%6 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0413%5 Sept
cache6–130.0518%4 Sept
anubis5–130.0015%4 Sept
cache9–13-0.0126%30 Aug
anubis6–130.0418%29 Aug
mirage13–50.0025%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0021%29 Aug
cache1–7-0.0129%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0518%29 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0812%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.0615%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0231%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0719%14 Aug
cache13–60.0022%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0550%19 Jul
anubis13–20.0341%19 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0826%18 Jul
cache13–100.0236%18 Jul
office6–13-0.0313%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0821%4 Jul
nuke14–160.0017%3 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0118%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0517%30 Jun
dust24–13-0.0622%30 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0919%11 Jun
mirage13–10.1033%7 Jun
mirage13–110.0512%7 Jun
inferno6–90.0622%6 Jun
inferno13–110.0016%6 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0214%5 Jun
anubis13–80.0416%5 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0425%5 Jun
cache13–60.0024%9 May
dust213–20.0722%24 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0313%29 Mar
mirage2–7-0.066%28 Mar
mirage6–130.0221%28 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0236%27 Mar
mirage16–140.0425%1 Mar
inferno1–9-0.1535%28 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0134%28 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0527%28 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0415%27 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0155%13 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0731%13 Feb
dust25–130.0033%7 Feb
mirage15–15-0.0224%30 Jan
ancient13–100.0026%30 Jan
dust27–13-0.0522%30 Jan
dust213–10-0.0118%30 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0512%18 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0632%18 Jan
dust213–110.0229%18 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0215%17 Jan
dust25–13-0.0229%17 Jan
inferno14–160.0227%3 Jan
mirage1–5-0.0025%2 Jan
dust24–13-0.069%29 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0123%27 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0327%27 Dec
ancient5–13-0.116%26 Dec
dust213–11-0.0330%25 Dec
mirage13–50.0224%24 Dec
inferno15–150.0317%19 Dec
train13–60.1020%18 Dec
nuke13–30.0827%18 Dec
dust216–13-0.0219%18 Dec
mirage10–130.0515%17 Dec
nuke4–13-0.0327%5 Dec
dust215–150.0523%4 Dec
mirage13–110.0123%27 Nov
train13–60.0111%26 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0611%26 Nov
mirage13–9-0.0311%19 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0319%17 Nov
vertigo13–80.0517%17 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0027%17 Nov
train11–13-0.0219%14 Nov
train6–13-0.0419%12 Nov
ancient13–50.0533%11 Nov
italy12–12-0.0414%8 Nov
inferno13–10.0516%4 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0121%4 Nov
vertigo10–130.0524%26 Oct
ancient12–12-0.0515%9 Oct
mirage13–60.0821%9 Oct
train13–10-0.0422%6 Oct
golden11–130.0322%6 Oct
palacio5–13-0.1017%5 Oct
brewery8–80.0712%23 Sept
train13–9-0.0320%7 Sept
inferno9–40.140%30 Aug
ancient13–5-0.083%28 Aug
train6–13-0.0324%27 Aug
dust20–13-0.0811%13 Aug
train0–8-0.086%17 Jul
anubis16–130.0026%18 Jun
dust213–8-0.0516%5 Jun
jura9–130.1015%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →