Dequavious Terrell Bishops III

Dequavious Terrell Bishops III — CS2 Stats

US76561198274953297[U:1:314687569]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,087Tracked matches62%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,114Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,597Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54805 of 225352 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 876 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,597 +279 18 Jul13 Sept · 18 days played
20,39523,355peak 23,35518 Jul13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 876 +0 28 Aug2 Sept · 3 observations
876876peak 87628 Aug2 Sept
23,724Peak Premier in tracked matches
876Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 876
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 25 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,758 below peak (23,355)
  • +524 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,403 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate38.1%48.3%51.0%12.9% short
Shot accuracy0.6%13.2%13.7%13.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.071.090.17 short
Match win rate54.2%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDequavious Terrell Bishop…FACEITLevel 9 · 876 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,597 · Pink bandPEAK ELO876csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning52
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55414Last 10055%Win rateWWWTWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 479ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time499ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 9 Sept
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 21 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 10 Sept
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
132In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 34mirageWeakest map · 47% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S34231168%-0.01
mirageB30141647%-0.02
ancientB147750%0.00
anubisA106460%0.03
cacheB63350%-0.01
nuke41325%0.01
inferno21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,005Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,177Matches
54.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
38.1%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
4,078MVPs
1,114Hours (in match)
1,775Bombs planted
557Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,534dust2
2,448inferno
1,949nuke
467vertigo
312train
10office
9cbble
3bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

562Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
75.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18851%0.9914.7
Dust215060%1.0415.3
Ancient7645%1.0115.9
Anubis6253%1.0014.2
Inferno4248%0.9612.6
Nuke2343%0.8513.0
Cache1553%0.8713.7
Overpass333%0.7214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
505msReaction time
47.4%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.63HE damage / grenade
13.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.16% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–3-0.0015%17 Sept
ancient13–40.1414%17 Sept
cache19–17-0.029%14 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0121%13 Sept
dust213–5-0.0219%13 Sept
ancient9–130.0118%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0312%12 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0118%12 Sept
dust216–14-0.0111%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.099%12 Sept
dust22–13-0.0726%10 Sept
dust213–50.0118%9 Sept
anubis13–50.1419%9 Sept
dust213–11-0.0815%9 Sept
ancient19–17-0.038%8 Sept
dust213–110.0719%8 Sept
dust213–8-0.0213%8 Sept
dust27–13-0.0215%7 Sept
dust28–130.0218%7 Sept
anubis10–130.0020%7 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0411%7 Sept
dust213–6-0.0422%7 Sept
cache13–3-0.0417%6 Sept
dust213–3-0.0612%6 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0613%6 Sept
mirage9–13-0.1018%5 Sept
mirage10–130.0815%5 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0410%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0433%5 Sept
ancient13–80.0413%5 Sept
nuke6–130.0221%4 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0515%4 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0516%4 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0516%4 Sept
dust213–90.0021%3 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0720%3 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0214%3 Sept
mirage13–40.0024%3 Sept
cache6–130.0214%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0717%3 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0411%2 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0521%2 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0820%2 Sept
mirage5–13-0.1116%2 Sept
inferno13–40.0315%1 Sept
mirage13–11-0.038%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.059%26 Aug
dust210–130.0112%25 Aug
nuke13–50.0138%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0526%25 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0618%25 Aug
dust213–100.0320%25 Aug
ancient9–130.0110%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0642%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0727%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0419%21 Aug
dust213–7-0.0120%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%20 Aug
ancient19–170.0323%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0119%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0115%19 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0233%19 Aug
dust213–60.0612%19 Aug
anubis9–130.0618%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0423%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0612%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0335%18 Aug
dust213–80.0321%18 Aug
mirage13–70.0417%17 Aug
dust213–6-0.0314%17 Aug
dust213–40.039%17 Aug
dust28–130.0011%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0316%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0114%12 Aug
anubis16–140.028%12 Aug
dust213–60.0017%12 Aug
anubis13–160.077%11 Aug
ancient3–130.0113%11 Aug
anubis1–13-0.044%11 Aug
mirage4–13-0.086%10 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0618%10 Aug
dust24–13-0.029%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0613%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0112%9 Aug
cache13–110.0213%6 Aug
dust213–7-0.0110%6 Aug
dust216–12-0.0211%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0611%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.009%6 Aug
dust216–14-0.0129%19 Jul
dust213–10-0.0322%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0316%19 Jul
cache15–150.0417%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0610%19 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0014%19 Jul
mirage15–150.009%19 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0218%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0217%19 Jul
anubis13–80.0121%18 Jul
anubis13–110.029%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →