Constin

Constin — CS2 Stats

HM76561198271711197[U:1:311445469]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

291Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.4 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGConstinFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim13
Positioning30
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLWTWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.6pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 698ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 711ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim1.3
Utility2.2
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 691ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.3
Positioning3.0
Utility2.2
Mechanics2.8
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 2.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time702ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 702ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 16–5 · mirage, 26 Mar →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 15 May →
500msFastest reaction time · 16–9 · dust2, 15 May →
16–1Biggest win · inferno, 26 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
78Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 31nukeWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3118–1358%-0.05
infernoC3111–2035%-0.07
dust2B2211–1150%-0.05
nukeD60–60%-0.08
overpass—43–175%-0.05
train—20–20%-0.08
cache—11–0100%-0.08
ancient—11–0100%-0.02
anubis—10–10%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
24.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
22.2%Spray accuracy
62.6%Counter-strafing
12.4°Preaim
691msReaction time
14.6%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
12.49HE damage / grenade
3.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3508° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3701% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3294 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0323%15 May →
cache13–5-0.0825%15 May →
inferno12–12-0.0511%15 May →
ancient13–6-0.0233%15 May →
dust213–7-0.0711%30 Jan →
nuke10–13-0.076%30 Jan →
inferno6–13-0.0725%30 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.0620%26 Jan →
dust24–13-0.056%25 Jan →
dust22–8-0.0533%24 Jan →
mirage13–0-0.0617%24 Jan →
anubis4–13-0.0511%24 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0411%17 Jan →
mirage13–8-0.077%17 Jan →
overpass13–8-0.069%17 Jan →
inferno13–3-0.0711%24 Nov →
dust213–4-0.0616%24 Nov →
dust212–12-0.0715%20 Nov →
train8–13-0.0826%20 Nov →
overpass16–12-0.0616%16 Apr →
dust29–16-0.0713%16 Apr →
mirage16–2-0.086%16 Apr →
inferno16–19-0.1212%10 Mar →
dust216–12-0.0414%9 Mar →
inferno16–14-0.0717%8 Mar →
mirage10–16-0.0915%3 Dec →
dust215–15-0.077%4 Nov →
inferno12–16-0.0712%4 Nov →
inferno7–16-0.0817%1 Oct →
mirage10–16-0.036%1 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0616%1 Oct →
inferno9–16-0.0619%11 Sept →
nuke10–16-0.0511%28 Aug →
nuke8–16-0.0621%27 Aug →
vertigo11–16-0.0911%14 Aug →
mirage10–16-0.059%9 Aug →
train8–16-0.0917%22 Jul →
inferno4–16-0.083%22 Jul →
mirage16–130.0218%15 Jul →
inferno9–16-0.110%15 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.128%2 Jul →
overpass10–16-0.0718%25 May →
dust26–16-0.104%25 May →
mirage12–16-0.113%21 May →
dust216–11-0.028%21 May →
mirage16–9-0.093%21 May →
mirage16–9-0.0014%15 May →
dust216–9-0.0819%15 May →
inferno16–13-0.018%15 May →
inferno13–16-0.129%14 May →
mirage9–16-0.0513%14 May →
inferno16–10-0.0713%14 May →
dust210–16-0.0217%22 Apr →
dust25–16-0.0913%15 Apr →
mirage16–50.0616%26 Mar →
dust216–14-0.048%26 Mar →
mirage16–5-0.0514%26 Mar →
mirage16–30.039%26 Mar →
inferno16–10.018%26 Mar →
mirage8–16-0.0517%18 Mar →
inferno10–16-0.089%18 Mar →
inferno16–12-0.055%17 Mar →
dust216–12-0.037%17 Mar →
inferno4–16-0.138%17 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0312%16 Mar →
inferno16–12-0.067%16 Mar →
overpass16–14-0.0211%12 Mar →
mirage13–16-0.080%12 Mar →
inferno14–16-0.103%12 Mar →
mirage8–16-0.085%12 Mar →
dust216–12-0.075%11 Mar →
inferno16–9-0.047%11 Mar →
nuke9–16-0.1113%11 Mar →
inferno9–16-0.047%9 Mar →
inferno9–16-0.076%7 Mar →
inferno14–16-0.087%7 Mar →
mirage16–11-0.0720%4 Mar →
dust25–16-0.079%4 Mar →
inferno5–16-0.088%4 Mar →
mirage16–9-0.036%2 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0616%26 Feb →
dust216–50.0412%26 Feb →
inferno8–16-0.079%26 Feb →
mirage2–16-0.120%26 Feb →
inferno12–16-0.064%26 Feb →
mirage16–13-0.0715%25 Feb →
dust214–16-0.0321%25 Feb →
inferno8–16-0.056%25 Feb →
mirage16–8-0.0410%25 Feb →
inferno16–10-0.0416%24 Feb →
dust216–13-0.0710%24 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0410%24 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.0910%23 Feb →
inferno16–6-0.0613%23 Feb →
mirage16–8-0.019%22 Feb →
dust214–16-0.0918%22 Feb →
mirage16–10-0.029%22 Feb →
nuke2–9-0.049%20 Feb →
nuke2–9-0.160%20 Feb →
mirage9–30.0427%19 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.