the answer

the answer — CS2 Stats

LT76561198271625613[U:1:311359885]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,571Tracked matches23%Win rate2020Tracked since
10,900Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,641 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,641 → 3,641
+10Tracked matches · now 2,571
−3.3ppWin rate · 26.7% → 23.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,641 +0 29 Aug – 21 Oct · 8 observations
3,6413,641peak 3,64129 Aug21 Oct
3,641Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,641
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 359 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches21——
Win rate43%——
K/D1.01——
Headshot %79%——

Measured 21 Oct 2026 → 28 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches7772+5
Win rate40%47%−7pp
K/D0.870.94−0.08
Headshot %80%77%+3pp

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 28 Oct 2026; previous 29 Aug 2026 → 23 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate68.1%50.9%
Shot accuracy16.3%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.981.09
Match win rate51.3%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGthe answerFACEITLevel 10 · 3,641 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,641csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97
Positioning55
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–62Last 10038%Win rateLLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.7pp headshot accuracy · −101ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 411ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 430ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.7
Utility4.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7
Positioning5.5
Utility4.5
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time476ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 476ms
Headshot accuracy28.5%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 30.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 7 Sept →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 30 Aug →
281msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · inferno, 10 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 27 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L5Current streak
2–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD3211–2134%-0.01
nukeB1910–953%0.01
ancientD196–1332%-0.02
dust2C104–640%0.00
infernoC83–538%-0.02
anubisD72–529%-0.00
cacheC52–340%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

449,219Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
10,434Matches
51.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
68.1%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 10 players
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
36,113MVPs
10,900Hours (in match)
11,886Bombs planted
2,887Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47215,102
AWP33,561
Glock-1810,711
Knife6,513
P2504,735
SG 5534,678

Lifetime map wins

30,216dust2
25,489inferno
6,703nuke
6,587train
5,309vertigo
1,246cbble
129shorttrain
111office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,051Matches
56%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
80.3ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage62257%1.1716.7
Ancient29655%1.1616.5
Dust227551%1.1416.2
Anubis27163%1.1816.6
Nuke15058%1.2916.5
Inferno9650%1.3017.8
Vertigo4965%1.1716.2
Overpass3853%1.1817.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.3%Spray accuracy
91.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
480msReaction time
41.6%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.80HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4421 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0318%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0232%24 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0617%22 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0122%22 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0328%20 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0328%10 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0543%10 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0942%10 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0329%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0447%9 Oct →
mirage16–130.0329%9 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0029%8 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0821%8 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0731%8 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0221%8 Oct →
ancient11–130.0027%8 Oct →
ancient16–19-0.0427%7 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0420%7 Oct →
inferno13–90.0226%7 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0829%2 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0619%2 Oct →
dust219–160.0232%30 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0528%30 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0917%30 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0129%29 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0118%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0240%21 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0420%21 Sept →
mirage13–100.0241%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0238%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0429%20 Sept →
mirage19–160.0130%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0032%20 Sept →
nuke9–130.0133%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0640%18 Sept →
cache13–40.0936%17 Sept →
nuke13–60.0529%17 Sept →
mirage15–190.0335%15 Sept →
inferno5–130.0548%15 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0230%15 Sept →
dust29–130.0029%14 Sept →
nuke8–130.0537%14 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0420%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0519%13 Sept →
mirage13–40.0031%13 Sept →
nuke13–100.0015%9 Sept →
mirage13–50.0238%9 Sept →
inferno6–130.0329%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0329%8 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0018%7 Sept →
anubis13–40.1148%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0432%31 Aug →
dust213–160.0333%31 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0332%31 Aug →
nuke19–160.0424%31 Aug →
mirage13–40.0226%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0452%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0423%30 Aug →
nuke13–90.0132%30 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0452%30 Aug →
nuke13–90.0132%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0423%30 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0623%30 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0434%30 Aug →
mirage11–130.0325%23 Aug →
nuke13–40.0438%22 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0426%18 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0644%12 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0623%11 Aug →
dust211–130.0035%10 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0232%10 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0527%9 Aug →
mirage13–90.0125%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0036%5 Aug →
mirage11–130.0234%5 Aug →
ancient13–50.0437%5 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0333%4 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0444%3 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0443%28 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0127%28 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0224%28 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0710%28 Jul →
dust213–100.0017%27 Jul →
nuke13–00.0232%27 Jul →
mirage9–70.0133%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0533%25 Jul →
mirage13–30.0132%24 Jul →
mirage13–80.0623%24 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0732%24 Jul →
inferno13–3-0.0137%16 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0333%16 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.1027%15 Jul →
mirage11–130.0125%15 Jul →
dust213–80.0624%15 Jul →
nuke13–100.0320%14 Jul →
cache7–130.0439%10 Jul →
mirage14–160.0131%10 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0130%9 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0718%9 Jul →
mirage8–130.0044%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.