charlie

charlie — CS2 Stats

GQ76561198269571447[U:1:309305719]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,268Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,825Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,799Top 25% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34477 of 259593 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,799 -343 24 Aug – 29 Oct · 25 days played
23,61026,532peak 26,53224 Aug29 Oct
26,781Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,733 below peak (26,532)
  • -1,094 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,201 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4382−39
Win rate51%54%−2pp
K/D1.121.17−0.04
Headshot %57%59%−2pp

Measured 4 Oct 2026 → 3 Nov 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 4 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy17.0%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.161.061.07above
Match win rate48.8%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcharlieFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,799 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning69
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −8.3pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 1–8–1 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact2.6

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time566ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 3 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · mirage, 10 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · cache, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 21 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2715–1256%0.05
cacheC156–940%0.03
nukeS1410–471%0.04
dust2A149–564%0.02
ancientD124–833%-0.01
infernoD82–625%0.01
anubisD62–433%-0.03
train—21–150%0.01
office—11–0100%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

171,564Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,911Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
23,678MVPs
3,140Hours (in match)
4,778Bombs planted
1,845Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4761,585
AWP13,706
P2505,941
SG 5533,921
MAC-103,250

Lifetime map wins

15,542dust2
9,542inferno
5,421nuke
4,449train
2,877vertigo
852cbble
245lake
65office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

377Matches
56%Win rate
1.57Avg K/D
107.5ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%1.7423.5
Ancient540%1.1315.4
Nuke4100%2.1320.3
Cache3100%1.3018.7
Dust22100%2.1424.0
Inferno1100%1.5027.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
560msReaction time
65.6%T opening success
60.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
6.57HE damage / grenade
10.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–30.0112%29 Oct →
cache0–8-0.0219%29 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.1630%29 Oct →
anubis11–130.0520%22 Oct →
ancient1–9-0.0921%21 Oct →
cache12–160.0724%21 Oct →
mirage3–130.0121%21 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0212%21 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0114%21 Oct →
mirage15–150.0717%20 Oct →
nuke13–40.0331%20 Oct →
dust213–40.0432%15 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0435%15 Oct →
anubis13–80.0017%15 Oct →
cache13–100.0526%15 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0329%13 Oct →
train13–90.0525%13 Oct →
train12–12-0.0321%7 Oct →
ancient7–130.0522%5 Oct →
nuke13–40.0934%5 Oct →
mirage16–130.0315%5 Oct →
mirage13–50.0215%5 Oct →
cache10–130.0419%5 Oct →
dust213–100.0825%5 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0018%5 Oct →
cache8–130.0521%5 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0711%5 Oct →
cache6–130.0521%1 Oct →
inferno13–40.0222%1 Oct →
inferno8–130.1328%1 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0424%1 Oct →
mirage13–90.0124%1 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0021%1 Oct →
cache13–110.0113%1 Oct →
ancient13–90.0622%30 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0126%29 Sept →
ancient9–130.0423%28 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0318%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0135%28 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0522%24 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0420%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0625%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0525%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0626%23 Sept →
mirage16–140.0925%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0931%21 Sept →
mirage13–60.1134%21 Sept →
ancient13–10.0125%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.1326%21 Sept →
nuke1–130.0123%21 Sept →
mirage7–130.0423%21 Sept →
anubis0–5-0.140%17 Sept →
inferno13–110.0225%17 Sept →
dust213–90.0714%17 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0116%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.1032%17 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0116%17 Sept →
mirage15–150.1423%16 Sept →
nuke3–130.0426%16 Sept →
nuke6–130.0122%16 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0123%16 Sept →
mirage9–130.1126%14 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0230%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0024%13 Sept →
nuke13–50.1037%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0030%13 Sept →
dust213–40.0229%10 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0225%10 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0023%10 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0616%10 Sept →
mirage0–5-0.0450%10 Sept →
mirage13–60.1227%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0626%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0616%7 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0324%7 Sept →
cache8–130.0322%7 Sept →
cache11–130.0118%3 Sept →
nuke13–30.0232%3 Sept →
mirage13–10.1924%3 Sept →
mirage13–30.1328%3 Sept →
dust29–130.0523%3 Sept →
inferno5–130.0122%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.1224%1 Sept →
nuke13–110.0526%1 Sept →
nuke13–80.0624%1 Sept →
cache13–50.1430%1 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0727%1 Sept →
dust213–40.0625%1 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0215%27 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0121%25 Aug →
cache13–70.0824%25 Aug →
dust213–80.0726%25 Aug →
nuke13–40.1434%25 Aug →
mirage4–130.0328%25 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0019%25 Aug →
inferno12–160.0028%24 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0115%24 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0125%24 Aug →
dust213–60.0627%24 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0428%24 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.