Tomatin90

Tomatin90 — CS2 Stats

76561198268673294[U:1:308407566]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

600Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,199Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,960Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75299 of 220803 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 600 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 18 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,960 -916 18 May10 Sept · 26 days played
17,28822,244peak 22,24418 May10 Sept
22,590Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-05-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,284 below peak (22,244)
  • +1,029 over 30 days · improving
  • +962 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 40 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=34,112), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate46.9%44.3%47.0%meets
Shot accuracy15.3%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.031.080.18 short
Match win rate36.9%45.2%46.7%9.8% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTomatin90PREMIER19,960 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateWLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time634ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 10 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 9 Jun
430msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 30 Aug
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS36251169%-0.01
dust2C27101737%-0.01
ancientD113827%-0.01
nukeB84450%-0.00
cacheS64267%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.03
infernoS54180%0.04
overpass1010%0.12
poseidon110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,587Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
3,272Matches
36.9%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
6,645MVPs
1,199Hours (in match)
1,169Bombs planted
693Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,013
AWP5,716
P2501,707
UMP-451,617
SSG 081,259
Knife1,196

Lifetime map wins

5,782dust2
2,687inferno
915vertigo
861train
714nuke
346cbble
42office
33dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

180Matches
56%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
82.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1872%1.0216.8
Dust2967%0.8614.3
Anubis540%1.0515.4
Ancient450%1.3913.8
Inferno333%0.7613.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
626msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
7.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–13-0.0230%9 Sept
dust26–130.0014%9 Sept
dust216–14-0.0132%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0522%9 Sept
mirage13–40.0517%5 Sept
cache10–50.0230%5 Sept
cache13–50.0612%5 Sept
ancient11–130.0316%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0414%2 Sept
dust28–130.0235%2 Sept
dust210–13-0.0425%30 Aug
ancient13–80.0520%30 Aug
mirage13–60.0219%30 Aug
mirage13–50.0424%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0415%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0526%28 Aug
cache6–13-0.0122%12 Aug
mirage13–50.0015%12 Aug
mirage13–50.0320%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0226%10 Aug
dust213–60.0320%9 Aug
ancient1–13-0.1018%9 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0213%9 Aug
cache13–6-0.0413%9 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0825%1 Aug
ancient8–130.0011%1 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0225%1 Aug
dust213–20.0525%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0520%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0019%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0112%29 Jul
ancient9–130.0210%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0126%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0811%23 Jul
dust213–11-0.0120%23 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0220%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0216%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0321%21 Jul
cache13–11-0.0615%21 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0128%17 Jul
mirage11–13-0.037%1 Jul
nuke13–50.0528%1 Jul
dust213–110.0014%1 Jul
dust213–50.0929%28 Jun
dust24–13-0.0829%28 Jun
dust212–16-0.0320%24 Jun
dust210–130.0123%24 Jun
dust29–130.0216%23 Jun
ancient13–90.0315%23 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0617%23 Jun
dust27–130.0024%20 Jun
mirage13–60.0828%18 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0619%18 Jun
inferno9–50.0418%18 Jun
dust29–13-0.0229%18 Jun
mirage11–00.0518%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0237%17 Jun
overpass11–130.1224%17 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0221%17 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0018%17 Jun
ancient0–13-0.070%17 Jun
mirage0–13-0.050%17 Jun
mirage13–50.0318%17 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0236%16 Jun
nuke13–16-0.059%16 Jun
dust213–8-0.0115%12 Jun
anubis13–50.0422%12 Jun
inferno5–130.0333%11 Jun
nuke3–13-0.028%10 Jun
dust28–3-0.0726%10 Jun
poseidon9–20.1333%10 Jun
inferno9–10.1833%10 Jun
dust20–13-0.0931%10 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0314%10 Jun
ancient13–110.0422%10 Jun
mirage13–4-0.058%9 Jun
dust21–13-0.0450%9 Jun
ancient0–13-0.060%9 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0413%9 Jun
dust213–110.0421%29 May
dust214–160.0229%27 May
mirage13–10-0.0414%27 May
dust25–13-0.0425%23 May
nuke5–130.0416%23 May
dust23–00.0050%23 May
mirage2–0-0.080%23 May
nuke4–13-0.0627%23 May
dust26–13-0.0718%22 May
mirage13–5-0.0110%22 May
mirage13–10-0.0623%22 May
mirage13–40.0520%21 May
mirage15–15-0.0414%21 May
mirage13–6-0.0415%20 May
mirage9–13-0.0212%20 May
dust215–15-0.059%19 May
mirage13–80.0316%19 May
mirage13–100.0323%19 May
dust29–13-0.0226%19 May
mirage13–90.0927%19 May
mirage13–7-0.0521%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →