Ma1ce — CS2 Stats

DK76561198268431490[U:1:308165762]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,688Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,574Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#211714 of 257756 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,899 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	46.7%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	15.1%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.31	1.09
Match win rate	49.5%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning71

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–49Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

0–5 · 0% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

6–14 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.5

Utility6.4

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning7.1

Utility6.4

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time522ms−0ms

first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms

Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 25 Sept →

39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · anubis, 11 Sept →

391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 29 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

L6Current streak

5–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	21	11–10	52%	0.02
cache	B	21	10–11	48%	0.04
inferno	B	19	9–10	47%	0.05
nuke	A	14	8–6	57%	0.03
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.05
mirage	B	6	3–3	50%	0.00
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

229,875Lifetime kills

1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

8,730Matches

49.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

46.7%Headshot %

15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

34,380MVPs

4,317Hours (in match)

9,776Bombs planted

4,369Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4793,008

M4A4 / M4A1-S32,719

AWP30,982

Desert Eagle20,127

P2000 / USP-S12,894

Glock-188,383

Knife2,857

MP92,386

SSG 082,208

P2502,131

Lifetime map wins

23,907inferno

9,234nuke

7,662vertigo

7,132dust2

4,933train

779office

673cbble

173assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,636Matches

53%Win rate

1.44Avg K/D

91.1ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	245	50%	1.49	20.7
Inferno	224	54%	1.54	20.5
Nuke	165	53%	1.45	19.2
Anubis	125	54%	1.49	19.3
Mirage	82	50%	1.11	16.5
Overpass	76	51%	1.50	19.2
Train	72	62%	1.54	21.3
Dust2	63	48%	1.38	18.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

83.8%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

521msReaction time

40.7%T opening success

51.8%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

10.93HE damage / grenade

11.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	7–13	-0.03	18%	26 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.01	13%	26 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	35%	26 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.01	17%	23 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.07	25%	23 Oct →
mirage	6–13	0.01	19%	23 Oct →
ancient	16–12	0.07	16%	21 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	11%	20 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.01	21%	19 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.01	24%	19 Oct →
ancient	9–13	0.10	23%	19 Oct →
anubis	13–9	0.03	30%	17 Oct →
nuke	5–13	0.06	27%	17 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.08	29%	17 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	16%	17 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	29%	7 Oct →
cache	7–13	0.08	35%	7 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	16%	5 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.02	30%	5 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.00	9%	5 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	8%	3 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	14%	3 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.08	16%	1 Oct →
cache	11–13	0.02	30%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.01	20%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.13	23%	29 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.07	20%	28 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	17%	26 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.19	33%	25 Sept →
cache	13–16	-0.00	12%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.08	20%	25 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.15	25%	24 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.03	19%	24 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.08	29%	24 Sept →
vertigo	15–19	0.09	22%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	24%	23 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.02	12%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.07	25%	21 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.07	22%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	21 Sept →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	13%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	22%	19 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	15%	19 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.02	29%	19 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	23%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	16%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–1	0.11	31%	19 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.02	26%	19 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.04	31%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	26%	18 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.05	19%	18 Sept →
cache	13–6	-0.01	21%	18 Sept →
anubis	20–22	0.06	14%	18 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.13	30%	18 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.00	15%	18 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.07	20%	17 Sept →
cache	16–12	0.05	21%	17 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.06	13%	17 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.07	20%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.05	18%	16 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.08	30%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.09	13%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.08	33%	15 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.02	31%	14 Sept →
cache	13–3	0.09	27%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	35%	14 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.06	23%	13 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.03	27%	13 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.02	28%	13 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	32%	13 Sept →
anubis	5–13	0.03	21%	13 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	0.05	21%	12 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.06	16%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.04	39%	11 Sept →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	22%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	27%	11 Sept →
nuke	16–13	0.04	30%	10 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	22%	10 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	24%	10 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.06	22%	7 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.06	24%	5 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.05	27%	5 Sept →
cache	7–13	0.01	24%	5 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.05	28%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	15%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.05	23%	4 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.04	29%	4 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.16	19%	4 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.11	23%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.07	32%	3 Sept →
ancient	14–16	0.02	14%	2 Sept →
vertigo	13–3	0.16	36%	2 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.12	27%	2 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.07	25%	31 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	10%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	13%	30 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	13%	30 Aug →
inferno	28–25	0.06	16%	30 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	15%	29 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.04	21%	29 Aug →