Tr1plex

Tr1plex — CS2 Stats

DK76561198267845817[U:1:307580089]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,533Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,792Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,078 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,078 → 2,078
+55Tracked matches · now 2,533
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,078 +0 1 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
2,0782,078peak 2,0781 Sept18 Sept
2,078Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
68Days played since 2025-07-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,078
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 422 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.6%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy15.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.09above
Match win rate49.3%46.9%48.4%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTr1plexFACEITLevel 9 · 2,078 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,078csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateWLLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time577ms−88ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 3 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · ancient, 26 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 22 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 82% over 22ancientWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2218–482%0.02
ancientC197–1237%-0.01
nukeA1610–663%-0.02
infernoA127–558%0.00
dust2A127–558%-0.00
overpassC83–538%-0.02
anubisA53–260%0.02
train—42–250%0.00
cache—20–20%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

165,801Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6,676Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
50.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
28,548MVPs
3,153Hours (in match)
9,812Bombs planted
4,951Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4764,944
AWP19,028
Knife3,466
FAMAS2,647
MAC-102,076

Lifetime map wins

20,700inferno
8,807nuke
6,935dust2
5,146vertigo
2,197train
415cbble
78lake
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,086Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
75.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29447%1.1015.7
Ancient24747%1.1015.9
Dust220450%1.0515.2
Nuke18456%1.1815.9
Inferno17149%1.0915.3
Anubis17048%1.0815.6
Overpass9153%1.1617.2
Train1947%1.2015.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
92.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
580msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
13.4%Flash assists
12.06HE damage / grenade
5.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–140.0420%11 Oct →
ancient14–160.0224%7 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0213%3 Oct →
inferno13–100.0515%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0714%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0235%27 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0622%24 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0621%15 Sept →
mirage13–80.0021%6 Sept →
mirage13–30.0825%2 Sept →
ancient4–130.0141%26 Aug →
nuke19–16-0.0028%17 Aug →
mirage13–70.0437%17 Aug →
ancient13–20.1326%3 Aug →
inferno13–40.0329%2 Aug →
inferno13–50.1027%27 Jul →
mirage13–40.0724%23 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0016%22 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0515%22 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0421%22 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0116%16 Jul →
ancient19–160.0523%14 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0533%14 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0413%13 Jul →
inferno6–90.0619%9 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0425%6 Jun →
mirage13–60.0720%31 May →
dust24–13-0.068%27 May →
inferno13–6-0.034%18 May →
overpass13–80.0210%27 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0124%27 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0316%22 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0532%21 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0518%15 Apr →
dust213–100.0335%15 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0425%6 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0614%6 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0024%6 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.068%4 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0129%4 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0415%4 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0630%4 Apr →
anubis16–140.0420%4 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0517%4 Apr →
ancient13–40.0225%4 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0115%3 Apr →
overpass16–13-0.0027%3 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0229%3 Apr →
anubis16–120.0131%3 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0328%3 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0527%24 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0428%23 Mar →
dust213–90.0218%22 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0732%22 Mar →
ancient13–40.1229%18 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.053%3 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0638%13 Jan →
dust213–100.0127%12 Jan →
inferno9–120.0321%9 Jan →
ancient13–110.0423%4 Jan →
overpass13–90.0035%4 Jan →
nuke13–6-0.0437%4 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0019%3 Jan →
mirage13–60.0519%3 Jan →
overpass6–13-0.0617%28 Dec →
ancient14–16-0.0517%28 Dec →
dust29–130.0124%28 Dec →
nuke13–4-0.0119%28 Dec →
mirage4–20.0911%27 Dec →
anubis13–50.1117%27 Dec →
train5–13-0.0633%16 Dec →
train13–9-0.0027%14 Dec →
dust213–6-0.0126%14 Dec →
mirage13–90.0424%14 Dec →
inferno15–19-0.0319%12 Dec →
mirage13–8-0.0322%12 Dec →
overpass16–190.0114%9 Dec →
train10–13-0.0123%8 Dec →
mirage16–120.0031%8 Dec →
mirage9–130.0231%5 Dec →
nuke7–130.0226%28 Nov →
mirage14–16-0.0531%23 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0222%16 Nov →
ancient15–19-0.0222%7 Nov →
mirage13–60.0037%5 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0122%13 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.1910%12 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0426%8 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0716%26 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0118%24 Sept →
nuke13–30.0431%23 Sept →
dust27–130.1010%14 Sept →
nuke13–60.0538%24 Aug →
train13–100.0718%18 Aug →
mirage11–130.0826%17 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0218%14 Aug →
mirage13–110.0124%2 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0729%31 Jul →
mirage5–20.1337%31 Jul →
nuke13–20.0526%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.