Iceberg

Iceberg — CS2 Stats

76561198267472182[U:1:307206454]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,156Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,544Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,750Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86900 of 252487 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (37 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−149Premier CS Rating · 19,899 → 19,750
+2Tracked matches · now 2,156
−3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 36.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,750 -3,180 10 Jul – 17 Oct · 21 days played
19,70123,674peak 23,67410 Jul17 Oct
23,890Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-07-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,924 below peak (23,674)
  • -149 over 30 days · steady
  • -3,674 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 250 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate47.4%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy18.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.181.051.06above
Match win rate42.8%45.7%46.3%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIcebergFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,750 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning59
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time613ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 11 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 10 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 9 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 18 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2915–1452%0.02
mirageB2010–1050%0.02
dust2D164–1225%-0.01
infernoA117–464%0.04
anubisA95–456%0.03
nukeC94–544%-0.01
ancientD51–420%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

145,949Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
5,872Matches
42.8%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
18.8%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
18,395MVPs
2,730Hours (in match)
3,762Bombs planted
2,072Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,346
AWP15,988
FAMAS3,053
MAC-102,541
P2502,527

Lifetime map wins

10,761inferno
4,760dust2
2,443nuke
2,321train
1,869vertigo
1,117cbble
72office
39lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

563Matches
49%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
87.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5956%1.2817.9
Inferno4141%1.2218.4
Anubis3238%1.1316.9
Ancient2564%1.3219.3
Dust21164%1.3718.9
Nuke1155%1.1717.6
Train20%1.2524.0
Cache1100%1.0617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
609msReaction time
46.5%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
11.84HE damage / grenade
9.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0924%17 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.059%16 Oct →
dust210–130.0230%10 Sept →
inferno13–50.0331%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0116%30 Aug →
anubis13–110.1113%30 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0031%21 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0517%21 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0917%1 Aug →
cache12–160.0416%1 Aug →
cache13–20.1420%31 Jul →
nuke10–130.1220%31 Jul →
cache13–90.1220%31 Jul →
cache7–130.0122%31 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0321%29 Jul →
mirage16–140.0422%29 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0220%26 Jul →
mirage7–130.0522%26 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0520%24 Jul →
mirage5–130.0428%24 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0314%23 Jul →
cache13–20.0719%23 Jul →
ancient8–130.0223%22 Jul →
cache7–130.0212%22 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0518%22 Jul →
inferno13–90.0516%22 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0011%19 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0215%19 Jul →
dust213–160.0023%19 Jul →
ancient13–110.0414%19 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0135%19 Jul →
dust213–50.0319%18 Jul →
inferno13–50.0423%18 Jul →
anubis13–110.0137%18 Jul →
anubis13–10.0310%18 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0210%17 Jul →
dust210–130.0217%17 Jul →
cache10–130.0220%17 Jul →
inferno6–130.0211%17 Jul →
cache13–110.0214%17 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0018%17 Jul →
mirage13–40.0824%17 Jul →
cache13–50.0214%16 Jul →
cache13–100.0216%16 Jul →
anubis7–130.0727%16 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0618%16 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0516%16 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.107%15 Jul →
anubis13–110.0917%15 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0313%15 Jul →
inferno13–50.0623%14 Jul →
mirage13–70.0311%14 Jul →
vertigo9–7-0.058%14 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.028%14 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0120%12 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0215%12 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0222%12 Jul →
nuke5–0-0.0020%12 Jul →
anubis13–70.0315%12 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0126%12 Jul →
mirage13–70.0210%11 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0113%11 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0228%11 Jul →
mirage11–130.0924%11 Jul →
cache13–8-0.056%11 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0520%11 Jul →
inferno13–50.1517%11 Jul →
nuke13–90.0720%11 Jul →
cache10–130.0326%11 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0210%11 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0526%11 Jul →
dust25–130.0115%11 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0117%10 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0538%10 Jul →
dust213–60.0827%10 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0223%10 Jul →
mirage13–80.0136%10 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.1024%10 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0231%10 Jul →
mirage13–60.0617%10 Jul →
inferno13–80.1131%10 Jul →
anubis7–130.0019%10 Jul →
cache13–110.0921%10 Jul →
mirage13–70.0533%10 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0122%10 Jul →
cache13–60.0434%10 Jul →
dust216–140.0116%10 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0322%9 Jul →
cache13–90.0718%9 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0117%9 Jul →
cache13–90.0824%9 Jul →
cache11–130.0328%9 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0318%9 Jul →
nuke10–130.0118%9 Jul →
cache7–130.0828%9 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0520%9 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0121%9 Jul →
cache13–40.0620%9 Jul →
cache11–130.0022%8 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0116%8 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.