Cabooose

Cabooose — CS2 Stats

AU76561198264644858[U:1:304379130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,432Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,205Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,780Blue band · top ~29.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,503 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−181Premier CS Rating · 14,961 → 14,780

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,780 -1,796 11 Aug – 1 Nov · 44 days played
14,59319,321peak 19,32111 Aug1 Nov
19,437Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,503Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,503
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 28 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,541 below peak (19,321)
  • -3,140 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,796 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 220 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate34.5%46.8%48.2%13.8% short
Shot accuracy19.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.171.061.07above
Match win rate43.4%46.3%46.9%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCaboooseFACEITLevel 8 · 1,503 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER14,780 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,503csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning62
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time560ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−8.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 3–0 · nuke, 20 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 20 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–10 · dust2, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 29% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D247–1729%0.04
mirageA2113–862%0.02
infernoB2010–1050%0.03
nukeA117–464%0.06
ancientC83–538%0.03
anubisB84–450%0.06
cacheC73–443%0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

170,309Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,822Matches
43.4%Match win rate
34.5%Headshot %
19.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
18,845MVPs
3,205Hours (in match)
7,173Bombs planted
2,372Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,418
AWP24,173
MP95,695
MAC-104,776
SG 5534,484
SSG 084,357

Lifetime map wins

21,588dust2
13,318inferno
3,289nuke
2,119vertigo
1,066train
881lake
338safehouse
280cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

170Matches
56%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
88.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2650%1.2417.9
Dust21753%1.4418.7
Inferno1662%1.1815.9
Ancient1258%1.3716.8
Nuke771%1.6418.0
Vertigo667%1.2719.3
Anubis475%1.4421.8
Cache3100%1.8725.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
42.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
565msReaction time
63.9%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
12.83HE damage / grenade
11.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5783° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0315%1 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.007%1 Nov →
inferno5–130.0213%1 Nov →
inferno13–90.0244%31 Oct →
cache10–130.1013%30 Oct →
mirage11–130.0012%30 Oct →
cache13–110.0716%28 Oct →
inferno16–140.1315%28 Oct →
inferno11–130.056%27 Oct →
inferno13–80.0724%27 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.008%27 Oct →
mirage9–130.0326%25 Oct →
nuke13–30.0625%23 Oct →
dust26–130.1618%22 Oct →
inferno5–130.0222%22 Oct →
dust28–130.0023%18 Oct →
mirage3–130.0413%17 Oct →
anubis7–130.0425%15 Oct →
anubis8–130.0110%15 Oct →
inferno13–90.009%14 Oct →
cache10–130.0122%14 Oct →
mirage11–130.0413%13 Oct →
dust28–130.0721%12 Oct →
inferno11–130.0616%11 Oct →
cache13–90.0313%11 Oct →
inferno13–70.059%11 Oct →
anubis13–20.1413%10 Oct →
mirage13–60.0716%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0336%10 Oct →
ancient11–130.0020%10 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0019%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0320%7 Oct →
inferno10–130.0319%3 Oct →
dust29–130.0620%2 Oct →
dust211–130.0319%29 Sept →
inferno13–60.0820%21 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0010%20 Sept →
nuke3–00.32100%20 Sept →
nuke9–130.039%20 Sept →
anubis13–100.102%20 Sept →
dust25–10-0.0145%19 Sept →
mirage13–100.0120%19 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.028%18 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.045%14 Sept →
inferno13–80.0217%12 Sept →
nuke4–130.0215%12 Sept →
cache9–130.0416%12 Sept →
nuke13–80.0616%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0518%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0510%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0314%10 Sept →
nuke13–60.0318%9 Sept →
mirage13–10.1030%9 Sept →
cache13–110.1018%8 Sept →
mirage7–130.0214%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.2020%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0245%5 Sept →
mirage7–130.0218%5 Sept →
dust28–130.0116%5 Sept →
dust213–50.0730%2 Sept →
inferno4–130.0215%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.1115%29 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.028%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0722%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0020%29 Aug →
anubis13–110.1813%28 Aug →
dust26–130.0822%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.1122%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0420%27 Aug →
dust210–130.0111%25 Aug →
anubis9–130.0017%25 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0314%23 Aug →
inferno13–160.0214%22 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0115%21 Aug →
dust215–150.0715%21 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0318%21 Aug →
dust213–20.1421%21 Aug →
dust213–50.07100%21 Aug →
dust213–7-0.06100%21 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0218%20 Aug →
mirage13–110.0117%20 Aug →
dust213–60.0121%20 Aug →
dust210–130.0726%19 Aug →
ancient13–100.0620%18 Aug →
mirage13–30.0423%18 Aug →
nuke7–40.0540%18 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0122%18 Aug →
nuke13–110.0819%17 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0311%17 Aug →
dust213–70.1022%17 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0341%17 Aug →
mirage13–40.027%17 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0011%16 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0269%16 Aug →
ancient13–50.0419%16 Aug →
vertigo8–13-0.0113%16 Aug →
dust211–130.0333%15 Aug →
inferno13–90.1013%14 Aug →
dust211–130.0217%12 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0120%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.